ball915
All-American
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2012
- Messages
- 5,796
Might be a Pete question but why is it that our offensive recruiting is lightyears ahead of our defensive recruiting?
Coley is a major factor on offense but he have no issues landing players at every position group. On defense we can recruit at DB and DE, struggle at LB and are putrid at DT. For as "good of a recruiter" Barrow was we certainly landed some talent at LB but not nearly enough. Hurlie proved to be a solid recruiter last year on offense so am thinking this could help us with LB's. Jethro is getting the DE's, including an absolute stud in 3 consecutive classes (McCord, AQM, Thomas) but has whiffed over and over again on DT's for the most part. Are our offensive coaches just that much better recruiters than our defensive coaches?
Do they not want to play for D'Onfrio? You'd think Al being a "defensive guy" he'd be able to land more defensive talent than offensive like Carroll at USC and Saban at Bama. Thoughts on this???
Coley is a major factor on offense but he have no issues landing players at every position group. On defense we can recruit at DB and DE, struggle at LB and are putrid at DT. For as "good of a recruiter" Barrow was we certainly landed some talent at LB but not nearly enough. Hurlie proved to be a solid recruiter last year on offense so am thinking this could help us with LB's. Jethro is getting the DE's, including an absolute stud in 3 consecutive classes (McCord, AQM, Thomas) but has whiffed over and over again on DT's for the most part. Are our offensive coaches just that much better recruiters than our defensive coaches?
Do they not want to play for D'Onfrio? You'd think Al being a "defensive guy" he'd be able to land more defensive talent than offensive like Carroll at USC and Saban at Bama. Thoughts on this???