@Tee3000 ... stats are stats, I wouldn’t even try to dispute them.
To counterbalance the predictive nature of your stats, first, an argument needs to be made that the S&P is more relevant and possibly more predictive. I just don’t have time to go through that, nor am I inclined. S&P might be a better measure, or it might not be. I would personally need to see the argument.
Secondly, it can be argued that there is a rationale why Saban was going to make him his OC (according to all reports), and therefore Manny employed a similar rationale in hiring him.
Thirdly, an argument can be made that lack of QB development was the primary reason even a vanilla offense couldn’t get off the ground last year. If QB development is addressed, that can go a long ways into significantly improving our offense. And I think it can be argued Enos is well regarded in terms of quarterback development and improving quarterback performance.
Finally, someone like
@Lance Roffers might be able to have a better metrics-based response to at least put those ugly stats into a context which might justify his hire.
I have to look at that post he made a few weeks back and look at it in more detail to see if that indeed achieves that objective, I’m not sure it does so more expansive counter argument would need to be made
