- Joined
- Dec 30, 2012
- Messages
- 16,298
Explain yourself.
NCAA just ruled Dewan ineligible.
NCAA just ruled Dewan ineligible.
For two months he railed on Blake saying he was being held out for no reason.
Now what?
@Consigliere
He has a terrible case of foot in mouth disease.Explain yourself.
NCAA just ruled Dewan ineligible.
It also said his appeal ruling by NCAA was denied, and he is ineligible. What else would he be appealing if he wasn’t deemed ineligible?I am right here. Did you read what was said?
The NCAA determined that he and Christian Dawkins had a contract — without sufficient support in the record to substantiate that finding.
There isn't evidence to find such a contract existed.
I am right here. Did you read what was said?
The NCAA determined that he and Christian Dawkins had a contract — without sufficient support in the record to substantiate that finding.
There isn't evidence to find such a contract existed.
2) Seems like the school knew something was fishy, regardless of whether the NCAA made a fair decision or not. The school appears to have made the right decision
I googled this to death... where is this article/ ruling/news/ source?
I googled this to death... where is this article/ ruling/news/ source?
It also said his appeal ruling by NCAA was denied, and he is ineligible. What else would he be appealing if he wasn’t deemed ineligible?
I can’t answer your question but it seems fairly obvious that an NCAA Investigation would consider evidence that may not be admissible in a criminal trial.I want to know how/why no evidence was provided at a criminal trial and yet the NCAA determined there was a contract.
I can’t answer your question but it seems fairly obvious that an NCAA Investigation would consider evidence that may not be admissible in a criminal trial.
Okay? Just admit that your entire understanding and subsequent diagnosis of this matter was way off - and move along.I want to the see if the NCAA releases a statement and whether or not VJ King or Lamar Peters are next.
As many here have said before., no criminal charge does not equal a positive outcome ruling on the eligibility of the student athlete by the NCAA. Apples and oranges.I can’t answer your question but it seems fairly obvious that an NCAA Investigation would consider evidence that may not be admissible in a criminal trial.