My main takeaway here is there is a very likely path for the ACC to survive post FSU/Clemson. The ACC is going to do all it can to stick around and try to beat out B12 as the long term biggest non P2 conference. Totally see them trying to woo USF or UCF to replace FSU.Some interesting math...
http://allsportsdiscussion.com/2024/05/23/the-acc-network-is-the-wildcard-to-the-conferences-future/
Big Ten remains Power Five revenue leader with $880 million haul for 2023 fiscal year, per report
For the second year in a row, the Big Ten generated more revenue than its power conference counterpartswww.cbssports.com
The BOG tied NCSU to UNC. Unless they have a change of heart (not happening within the next 4 years bc of who is appointed to the BOG). UNC is only gone if NCSU also gets a spot elsewhere as well, that’s equivalent.Not sure where you came up with that ... but ... it IS being discussed in North Carolina. They have been discussing the fact that the State Legislature has established a goal of INCREASING SPORTS TOURISM in North Carolina and they want to do all they can to protect the estimated $500-$600 Million dollar annual economic impact on the Charlotte metro area that ACC Conference activities bring to the region (championship events for different sports, meetings, etc.). It has been mentioned that they are evaluating some financial assistance to UNC and possibly other NC universities to close the gap between the ACC and the SEC that exists due to the different media deals.
So you will be a perneiial 7-3/6-4 team. It is what it isI just wanna be in a world where we play most of our traditional rivals + other schools I despise yearly:
FSU
UFag
Notre Lame
Pitt
Syracuse
West Virginia
Pedo State
UNC
Louisville
Then insert 3 random rotational crap schools yearly but gimme those 9 all the time
Can’t take this man seriously
Pitt, SU & L'Ville...I just wanna be in a world where we play most of our traditional rivals + other schools I despise yearly:
FSU
UFag
Notre Lame
Pitt
Syracuse
West Virginia
Pedo State
UNC
Louisville
Then insert 3 random rotational crap schools yearly but gimme those 9 all the time
Cuse? WV? Louisville? I dont care at all about playing these teams. Give me a Big Ten schedule with Ohio State, Nebraska etc. Teams that we have actually played for national championships... Those are way more compelling games than playing cuse on bally sports.I just wanna be in a world where we play most of our traditional rivals + other schools I despise yearly:
FSU
UFag
Notre Lame
Pitt
Syracuse
West Virginia
Pedo State
UNC
Louisville
Then insert 3 random rotational crap schools yearly but gimme those 9 all the time
Based on recent past maybe but with what we're building don't think soSo you will be a perneiial 7-3/6-4 team. It is what it is
My main takeaway here is there is a very likely path for the ACC to survive post FSU/Clemson. The ACC is going to do all it can to stick around and try to beat out B12 as the long term biggest non P2 conference. Totally see them trying to woo USF or UCF to replace FSU.
I think long term there’s probably 4-5 Big 12 schools the ACC would like to poach and there’s probably 3-4 ACC schools (Miami included) the Big 12 would like to poach. Whoever can do the poaching first will eventually win that battle.
Won’t happen anytime soon, but a joint merger by Big 12 and ACC to create a super league of their best teams would really kick things into motion for a top 60 super league of 3 conferences
Yeah, I think the reporting on the espn contract has been very poor. It would be nice if the florida attorney general could actually get a copy released. I don't see how they have an opt out in 2025. That doesn't make sense and doesn't with the GOR. I would assume they had some sort of look-in to look at the profitability of the ACC Network based on what kind of coverage they were getting across the market.
Bottom line is the ACC Network is profitable. FSU and Clemson will certainly lose the lawsuits. Only question is if the ACC would entertain a settlement. I don't see how one is feasible before 2030.
You have it all wrong. There is no "opt out" for ESPN in 2025. The way this has taken place is:Yeah, I think the reporting on the espn contract has been very poor. It would be nice if the florida attorney general could actually get a copy released. I don't see how they have an opt out in 2025. That doesn't make sense and doesn't with the GOR. I would assume they had some sort of look-in to look at the profitability of the ACC Network based on what kind of coverage they were getting across the market.
Bottom line is the ACC Network is profitable. FSU and Clemson will certainly lose the lawsuits. Only question is if the ACC would entertain a settlement. I don't see how one is feasible before 2030.
Am I wrong that the 70 million your talking about is only for one season cause that 260 million from FSU/Clemson leaving is a one time payout so a one time split between the teams?
After that one time split all the teams then go back to just 53 million going forward wouldn't they?
No. I think you are basically 100% wrong. But we will see.You have it all wrong. There is no "opt out" for ESPN in 2025. The way this has taken place is:
-ESPN media agreement has a termination date of June 30, 2027. That is the current expiration date of
the ESPN media agreement ... and due to the wording of the GOR ... that it was created specifically to support the
ESPN media agreement ... the GOR expires with the media agreement.
-The ACC granted ESPN an OPTION TO EXTEND the media agreement for 9 additional years. That option expired
in January 2021 and was NOT exercised by ESPN.
-Jim Phillips, Swofford's replacement, UNILATERALLY granted ESPN an new option with an exercise date expiring
on February 2, 2025. Phillips granted this new option WITHOUT MEMBER 2/3 APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY
THE ACC BYLAWS. Therefore there is a high probability that ESPN could not exercise the "illegal option" even if
they so desired.
-The wording that has leaked regarding the ESPN MEDIA AGREEMENT is even more problematic for Phillips and the ACC
given that their goal is to mislead the members into believing they are committed through 2036. The ESPN media agreement
is said to include the wording "this agreement is in effect while a member institution remains a member of the conference".
The ESPN media agreement STATES it's rights to broadcast a schools games is in effect ONLY while the school is a conference
member. A schools leaves, paying the conference exit fee, and they leave WITH their future media rights in tact.
The Florida AG is awaiting a copy of the ESPN media agreement requested from the ACC, while Clemson has already received an unredacted copy ... under an order of confidentiality. They cannot publicly disclose it's contents or share it with any other ACC member ... it can only be used
in the court proceedings in the SC Clemson suit. FSU and Clemson are both in a position of strength going forward to win the suits and that is a primary reason that ESPN will most likely pressure the ACC to settle, and likely very soon. I expect FSU to be playing in another conference in 2026.
Basically your take on the current status appears to be inaccurate on every count.