Cold, Harsh Reality in Charlotte(thoughts on Clemson)..

Malek Young's future here is looking a bit grim with the incoming players. I don't see how he'll keep his spot.

This team sucks at the start of a game and that is either poor gameplanning, lack of urgency, or a combination of both. I don't believe it's a talent issue as it happens to **** poor teams just as much as it does against quality competition.

Injuries throughout the year have certainly affected offensive continuity, but even at full health Rosier is woefully inaccurate. We Essentially had two miracle last second wins not because of Rosier (besides putting the ball in the area of Langam at FSU, etc) but due to a crazy play made by one of ours.

We had an extra day off this week, So I don't buy the missing a bye week stuff. Whatever, I picked Clemson to win the ACC to win and thought we would make it to the ACCCG, just wish we had put up more of a fight.

I tried to tell people that he wasn't as good as those PFF stats suggested.

If these FR are as good as the hype, Young won't start next year.
 
Advertisement
Canes offense sucks period, defense has been carrying this team all season long until now its run out of gas and also add Miami football teams never win in cold weather places in December.

Our offense also regressed from last year too.

Here is how we performed against our regular season ACC schedule:

2016 (averages): Defense

Points Allowed: 21.75 (This includes the 7 points on the STs TD against Pitt, the 100 Yard Return) [Actual Points Allowed is 20.875]
Yards Allowed: 397.75
Turnovers: 1.5
Sacks: 2.5
Tackles for Loss: 6.75

2016 (averages): Offense

Points Scored: 29.38 (This includes the 14 points the D scored against GT, 2 Fumble TDs) [Actual Points Scored is 27.625]
Yards Gained: 394.13
Turnovers: .63
Sacks: 2
Tackles for Loss: 5.5

2017 (averages): Defense

Points Allowed: 18.75 (This includes the 7 points on the STs onside kick flop against GT) [Actual Points Allowed is 17.875]
Yards Allowed: 368.25
Turnovers: 2.75
Sacks: 3.75
Tackles for Loss: 8.75

2017 (averages): Offense

Points Scored: 27.125 (This includes the 7 points the D scored against UVA, Johnson Pick 6) [Actual Points Scored is 26.25]
Yards Gained: 392.625
Turnovers: 1.25
Sacks: 2.375
Tackles for Loss: 5.375

It's almost like we replaced a QB who is on an NFL roster with a baseball player...
 
Canes offense sucks period, defense has been carrying this team all season long until now its run out of gas and also add Miami football teams never win in cold weather places in December.

Our offense also regressed from last year too.

Here is how we performed against our regular season ACC schedule:

2016 (averages): Defense

Points Allowed: 21.75 (This includes the 7 points on the STs TD against Pitt, the 100 Yard Return) [Actual Points Allowed is 20.875]
Yards Allowed: 397.75
Turnovers: 1.5
Sacks: 2.5
Tackles for Loss: 6.75

2016 (averages): Offense

Points Scored: 29.38 (This includes the 14 points the D scored against GT, 2 Fumble TDs) [Actual Points Scored is 27.625]
Yards Gained: 394.13
Turnovers: .63
Sacks: 2
Tackles for Loss: 5.5

2017 (averages): Defense

Points Allowed: 18.75 (This includes the 7 points on the STs onside kick flop against GT) [Actual Points Allowed is 17.875]
Yards Allowed: 368.25
Turnovers: 2.75
Sacks: 3.75
Tackles for Loss: 8.75

2017 (averages): Offense

Points Scored: 27.125 (This includes the 7 points the D scored against UVA, Johnson Pick 6) [Actual Points Scored is 26.25]
Yards Gained: 392.625
Turnovers: 1.25
Sacks: 2.375
Tackles for Loss: 5.375

It's almost like we replaced a QB who is on an NFL roster with a baseball player...

You mean the guy that people hated last year?

You mean the guy that many were excited left?

Brad Kaaya 13 Games in 2016: 3532 Passing Yards, 62% Completion %, 27 TDs and 7 INTs, 1 Rushing TD

Malik Rosier 12 Games in 2017: 2917 Passing Yards, 55% Completion $, 25 TDs and 11 INTs, 427 Rushing Yards and 5 Rushing TDs

- Our offense scored more TDs with Rosier (30 v. 28, keep in mind Malik has another game)
- Our offensive production via our QB has 200 yards less. Keep in mind Kaaya's stats are through 13 games and Malik's are through 12.
 
Thank you for your posting, [MENTION=1464]k9cane[/MENTION]! I have a question for you.

How many receivers were open that Rosiers missed?
 
Breaking down this game would put me in an early grave. You're a better man then I trying to rationalize the minutiae of this game.

Simply we put, we ain't ready for this **** yet. In every measure. We ain't built for it yet. Will we ever be? I don't know.

We don't run the ball and as a result, we have a ridiculously inefficient offense that is constantly putting the defense in a bad spot.

Diaz's defense is predicated on pressure, turnovers, and in many ways "bend but don't break"...his defense is fine, but if you have them on the field for 35 minutes in a game (Canes averaged 27m in TOP all year...bottom 10 in the nation) they are going to get busted. Also, the defense ain't built for this **** and to be fair, I don't think Diaz's defense will ever be schemed to play big boy football (I still like him, but yeah).

Big boy football is about stopping the run (Clemson, Alabama, Georgia, and Wisconsin all in the Top 15 against the run) and limiting YAC (Clemson, Bama, Wisconsin, Georgia, Ohio State all in Top 7!! in Yd/Att in pass defense). Miami's profile is more favorable with Oklahoma, but we don't play in the Big XII (and watch what happens to Oklahoma now that they are going to be playing the big boys in the playoffs). The above teams rely less on turnovers on more on just stopping you. We have a strong defensive line individually, but if you compare it to the big boys in their production (especially against the run and contributing to stopping the bullshyt bubble screens/flares) we are just a step, schematically behind.
 
We played with ONE RB, NO TE, and ONE WR agains the defending champs. I am not surprised by the outcome. Losing Herndon was the biggest loss of the year as far as personel is concerned. Helped both the run and passing game. We went to battle the biggest enemy this season with rubber bands.
 
Diaz playing zone the first quarter allowed Pitt and Clemson QB to complete their first 15 passes........
i hope he stops doing that. Miami db's suck at zone. They are terrible at it.

You forgot the Virginia QB, Benkert, who destroyed us at HRS.
 
We played with ONE RB, NO TE, and ONE WR agains the defending champs. I am not surprised by the outcome. Losing Herndon was the biggest loss of the year as far as personel is concerned. Helped both the run and passing game. We went to battle the biggest enemy this season with rubber bands.

We coulda had Njoku, Olson and Herndon out there and lost last nite.
 
The only thing that made me feel better about last night was knowing that k9 flew all the way across the country and had to endure it in person.
 
Advertisement
I surprised Clemson didn't score more. Game was over first quarter. Missed fg was it for me. I knew then nothing would go right the rest of the way. Canes are 2 years away from elite level play. Perry would be RS sophomore then and Canes would have better depth across the board. Canes had horrible depth at QB, RB, TE, LB and a punter to boot to compete in CFP.
 
The reality: No matter the game plan, we were NOT beating that Clemson team last night. They were better in every facet imaginable. Each of their units was bigger, stronger and faster than ours. We were overmatched.

Not even worth going into details. We need more top talent across the board in order to compete with the Top 5 teams.

That said, Clemson looks the best out of all of the playoff teams in my opinion. I think Clemson and Georgia.
 
I don't get the people complaining about Richt's play-calling or scheme.

I actually loved what I saw. We used pistol formation with motion to confuse their front 4. We ran jet sweeps, wildcat formations, reverse to Rosier for deep ball, and we moved the pocket and took shots down field.

I really hope we keep the pistol formation – I think it suits as well and there's a lot you can disguise out of it.
 
Question; how much of a momentum change would it had been if Bagley hit that FG, and we recover those two gimme fumbles? Do the game outcome change? I felt we had a defeatist attitude after a whole w blown opportunities
 
Question; how much of a momentum change would it had been if Bagley hit that FG, and we recover those two gimme fumbles? Do the game outcome change? I felt we had a defeatist attitude after a whole w blown opportunities

Maybe, but c’mon. We play that game 10 times, Clemson wins 9 minimum. They’re better than we are right now. It’s not complicated.
 
The QB job should be open come offseason?

****, the QB job should be open for the BOWL GAME.

There’s no good reason the baseball player from Alabama should take another snap at QB for the University of Miami.
 
Advertisement
I don't get the people complaining about Richt's play-calling or scheme.

I actually loved what I saw. We used pistol formation with motion to confuse their front 4. We ran jet sweeps, wildcat formations, reverse to Rosier for deep ball, and we moved the pocket and took shots down field.

I really hope we keep the pistol formation – I think it suits as well and there's a lot you can disguise out of it.

I'm pretty sure the stuff you mentioned started after our **** was already mashed in. At least the wildcat was.
 
Question; how much of a momentum change would it had been if Bagley hit that FG, and we recover those two gimme fumbles? Do the game outcome change? I felt we had a defeatist attitude after a whole w blown opportunities

Maybe, but c’mon. We play that game 10 times, Clemson wins 9 minimum. They’re better than we are right now. It’s not complicated.

Oh I agree; but momentum is a mutha. I think we still lose, but it’s competitive. When u got balls literally hopping in and out of a players arms w no one around, and ur able to capitalize on that, not once, but twice! U know it’s ur night!
 
Yeah the little toss to Homer was Richt's genius game planning. Clem is really good but they did lose to Syr, However we could have easily lost to Syr and GT and NC and Virginia. So I really just think we benefited from 2 massive home field advantages vs VT and ND. Who just didn't have a throwing QB. We like to play teams that run first and then have a bad QB. Any QB and opposing OC can easily rip apart our secondary. No arguments. Just look at the numbers. The O line was weak all year generally speaking. It's easy now to see, cause sometimes we just get all caught up in the hype and think we are invincible. Rosier was hot and cold, just go re watch the games. I still and always will be upset that Richt hired his own son as a coach. Nepotism is never a good idea.
 
Diaz playing zone the first quarter allowed Pitt and Clemson QB to complete their first 15 passes........
i hope he stops doing that. Miami db's suck at zone. They are terrible at it.

I can't understand why he hasn't learned that our zone makes every QB look like a Heisman finalist.
 
Back
Top