#26-MEAST
Junior
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 2,000
These must be very confusing interviews for ol' Joe Rose as it must seem like an alternate reality in which Mario Cristobal wasn't named our head coach.
The relief I felt when Richt was named the head coach was two-fold. One, we got a great, experienced head coach. And two, we didn't hire Mario.These must be very confusing interviews for ol' Joe Rose as it must seem like an alternate reality in which Mario Cristobal wasn't named our head coach.
The relief I felt when Richt was named the head coach was two-fold. One, we got a great, experienced head coach. And two, we didn't hire Mario.These must be very confusing interviews for ol' Joe Rose as it must seem like an alternate reality in which Mario Cristobal wasn't named our head coach.
it was the exact opposite of when we fired randy
other than gruden ( who we dont even know would have been a great college coach) there were NO good candidates , golden certainly wasnt the right hire, but its not exactly like we had alot to choose from
this time around two big jobs (USC and VT) had just been taken, when richt was fired, and we were the best jop open, plus we had began asking him about his interest in the job before, it worked out perfectly
I remember someone asking Richt about the Miami job mid-season and he didn't blow it off like he had in the recent past. That was a great sign at that point. And yes, there was real interest in the job this time around compared to 5 years ago. That is why I was so bothered by the Mario talk, and all his endorsements. Why bother even talking to a guy with his lack of success?The relief I felt when Richt was named the head coach was two-fold. One, we got a great, experienced head coach. And two, we didn't hire Mario.These must be very confusing interviews for ol' Joe Rose as it must seem like an alternate reality in which Mario Cristobal wasn't named our head coach.
it was the exact opposite of when we fired randy
other than gruden ( who we dont even know would have been a great college coach) there were NO good candidates , golden certainly wasnt the right hire, but its not exactly like we had alot to choose from
this time around two big jobs (USC and VT) had just been taken, when richt was fired, and we were the best jop open, plus we had began asking him about his interest in the job before, it worked out perfectly
I remember someone asking Richt about the Miami job mid-season and he didn't blow it off like he had in the recent past. That was a great sign at that point. And yes, there was real interest in the job this time around compared to 5 years ago. That is why I was so bothered by the Mario talk, and all his endorsements. Why bother even talking to a guy with his lack of success?The relief I felt when Richt was named the head coach was two-fold. One, we got a great, experienced head coach. And two, we didn't hire Mario.These must be very confusing interviews for ol' Joe Rose as it must seem like an alternate reality in which Mario Cristobal wasn't named our head coach.
it was the exact opposite of when we fired randy
other than gruden ( who we dont even know would have been a great college coach) there were NO good candidates , golden certainly wasnt the right hire, but its not exactly like we had alot to choose from
this time around two big jobs (USC and VT) had just been taken, when richt was fired, and we were the best jop open, plus we had began asking him about his interest in the job before, it worked out perfectly
I was all in on Mario vs butch or another coach mentioned, but when richt came up no way did I want anyone but richt. the guy is a great coach. has the best history of any coach Miami has hired. that said Mario to me was better then re hiring butch.
i do think butch could have won here? but for how long?I'd have prefered Butch to Mario, because Butch has actually won something. Butch had rebuilt Miami from ashes, so he'd done it before. Could he have done it again? I don't know. But trusting someone that has never done it, or won anything, wasn't a better option to me. See Randy and Al hires... Richt was, however, far and away the best out there. It's a shame he went to Georgia when he did, because he would have been the perfect guy for us when Davis left after the 2000 season. Think of all the crap we'd have saved ourselves the last 15 years had he not gone to Georgia and came to UM instead.
i do think butch could have won here? but for how long?I'd have prefered Butch to Mario, because Butch has actually won something. Butch had rebuilt Miami from ashes, so he'd done it before. Could he have done it again? I don't know. But trusting someone that has never done it, or won anything, wasn't a better option to me. See Randy and Al hires... Richt was, however, far and away the best out there. It's a shame he went to Georgia when he did, because he would have been the perfect guy for us when Davis left after the 2000 season. Think of all the crap we'd have saved ourselves the last 15 years had he not gone to Georgia and came to UM instead.
would he have been relevant in his 70's did we really just want a guy for 4 or 5 years (again?)
i believe we have a chance to keep richt for close to 10, which is awesome
in all fairness to mario cristobalButch could have coached another 10 years +. See Bill Snyder. I do see your point, though. My response to that would be this.. Would the program be better off in 5 years with Butch retiring, or 5 years of more failure? Hiring Mario could have been disastrous. Not just if he didn't get results, but because it would show the college football world that we aren't serious about winning, because we aren't serious about hiring a quality head coach. We quieted everyone in the media with the Richt hire. Even if Richt underperforms here, and I don't expect him to, at least we showed the world we're paying with the big boys to compete. Recruits notice that. Fans notice that. We go cheap with a hire, fans speak with their wallets and go cheap as well. Butch would have created a positive buzz amongst 90% of the fanbase. Richt scores even higher. Mario? Not even close.i do think butch could have won here? but for how long?I'd have prefered Butch to Mario, because Butch has actually won something. Butch had rebuilt Miami from ashes, so he'd done it before. Could he have done it again? I don't know. But trusting someone that has never done it, or won anything, wasn't a better option to me. See Randy and Al hires... Richt was, however, far and away the best out there. It's a shame he went to Georgia when he did, because he would have been the perfect guy for us when Davis left after the 2000 season. Think of all the crap we'd have saved ourselves the last 15 years had he not gone to Georgia and came to UM instead.
would he have been relevant in his 70's did we really just want a guy for 4 or 5 years (again?)
i believe we have a chance to keep richt for close to 10, which is awesome
in all fairness to mario cristobalButch could have coached another 10 years +. See Bill Snyder. I do see your point, though. My response to that would be this.. Would the program be better off in 5 years with Butch retiring, or 5 years of more failure? Hiring Mario could have been disastrous. Not just if he didn't get results, but because it would show the college football world that we aren't serious about winning, because we aren't serious about hiring a quality head coach. We quieted everyone in the media with the Richt hire. Even if Richt underperforms here, and I don't expect him to, at least we showed the world we're paying with the big boys to compete. Recruits notice that. Fans notice that. We go cheap with a hire, fans speak with their wallets and go cheap as well. Butch would have created a positive buzz amongst 90% of the fanbase. Richt scores even higher. Mario? Not even close.i do think butch could have won here? but for how long?I'd have prefered Butch to Mario, because Butch has actually won something. Butch had rebuilt Miami from ashes, so he'd done it before. Could he have done it again? I don't know. But trusting someone that has never done it, or won anything, wasn't a better option to me. See Randy and Al hires... Richt was, however, far and away the best out there. It's a shame he went to Georgia when he did, because he would have been the perfect guy for us when Davis left after the 2000 season. Think of all the crap we'd have saved ourselves the last 15 years had he not gone to Georgia and came to UM instead.
would he have been relevant in his 70's did we really just want a guy for 4 or 5 years (again?)
i believe we have a chance to keep richt for close to 10, which is awesome
im not going to say he COULDNT win at miami
i just believe the odds of us winning under richt or butch are greater
Sounds like richards and bruce are going to have the chance to play a ton right away. And just as I thought all along berrios just isn't that good.