Chad Thomas 50/50

This is what happens on this site anytime there is a rumor or development

[video=youtube;eDOiuGQuR5I]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDOiuGQuR5I[/video]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Advertisement
crossover22[]_[];1818913 said:
crossover22[]_[];1818874 said:
crossover22[]_[];1818865 said:
Would you take 10s running back over 14s?

THAT'S WHAT HE JUST SAID, YOU NUTJOB.

He said the depth was better.



So you'd take them over duke and yearby. Gotcha.

I'll repeat:

Lamar Miller
Storm Johnson
Mike James
Craig Cooper
Damien Berry

Ill take duke, yearby, Crawford and Gus over that all day.


10s depth was better but duke is better then all of them.

Well Duke committed to RS so he had the rb stocked... It was in better shape than it is now...
 
I ain't reading 15 pages of jibber jabber. Where are you asshats going to drown your sorrows when Golden ***** this up tomorrow?

154.gif
 
Golden recruits a lot better than Shannon?

Well why in the **** did Shannons defenses do so much better than Golden's?

If Golden's been out-recruiting Randy, why our defenses giving up 500 yards a game?

Oh crap.

Randy was a better coach . . .
 
Golden recruits a lot better than Shannon?

Well why in the **** did Shannons defenses do so much better than Golden's?

If Golden's been out-recruiting Randy, why our defenses giving up 500 yards a game?

Oh crap.

Randy was a better coach . . .

And radio never lost to duke and he actually beat FSU....
 
Perryman? lol. He was about as good as Colin McCarthy, and not even close to Sean Spence.

Hankerson and Benjamin versus Dorsett and Coley...well, Coley is the most talented, but he's only a sophomore and won't be putting up Hankerson 2010 numbers (that's one of the best receiving seasons in UM history by far). I think Dorsett and Benjamin are about equal. Dorsett gets open easier than Benjamin, but Benjamin made an impact on special teams. So 2010 wins again.

Didn't Allen Hurns just put up a better year than Hanks 2010?
 
Perryman? lol. He was about as good as Colin McCarthy, and not even close to Sean Spence.

Hankerson and Benjamin versus Dorsett and Coley...well, Coley is the most talented, but he's only a sophomore and won't be putting up Hankerson 2010 numbers (that's one of the best receiving seasons in UM history by far). I think Dorsett and Benjamin are about equal. Dorsett gets open easier than Benjamin, but Benjamin made an impact on special teams. So 2010 wins again.

Didn't Allen Hurns just put up a better year than Hanks 2010?

Do you actually watch the games?
 
Advertisement
Hankerson:

2009: 45 rec, 807 yards, 6 TDs
2010: 72 rec, 1,156 yards, 13 TDs

Hurns:

2012: 28 rec, 314 yards, 4 TDs
2013: 62 rec, 1,162 yards, 6 TDs
 
Hankerson:

2009: 45 rec, 807 yards, 6 TDs
2010: 72 rec, 1,156 yards, 13 TDs

Hurns:

2012: 28 rec, 314 yards, 4 TDs
2013: 62 rec, 1,162 yards, 6 TDs

Not entirely sure why you put their respective 09 and 12 seasons up there since I asked about the 2010 and 2013 seasons but ok. And yes I watch every single game. Looks pretty comparable. Both had **** QBs and you could argue Hurns has to compete with more talented WR's whereas Hank was our ONLY threat that year.
 
Hankerson:

2009: 45 rec, 807 yards, 6 TDs
2010: 72 rec, 1,156 yards, 13 TDs

Hurns:

2012: 28 rec, 314 yards, 4 TDs
2013: 62 rec, 1,162 yards, 6 TDs

Not entirely sure why you put their respective 09 and 12 seasons up there since I asked about the 2010 and 2013 seasons but ok. And yes I watch every single game. Looks pretty comparable. Both had **** QBs and you could argue Hurns has to compete with more talented WR's whereas Hank was our ONLY threat that year.

Not only did Hankerson have to deal with Harris getting hurt and replaced by a true freshman Stephen Morris, he also a played a tougher schedule (17th in 2010, versus 44th in 2013) and 2010 had 3 guys catch more than 40 balls (2013 only had one-Hurns) and the RBs also caught more than 40 passes in 2010. Not the case in 2013.
 
Here's a little comparison between Randy's 2010 team and Al's 2013:

2010:

SOS: 17th
Offense:

421 yards per game
22 first downs per game
26.8 ppg

Defense:

323 yards allowed per game
17 first downs allowed per game
20.7 ppg allowed

2013:

Offense:

426 yards per game
19 first downs per game
33.8 ppg

Defense:

427 yards allowed per game
22 first downs allowed per game
26.8 ppg allowed

***Al Golden is a defensive coach***
 
I didn't even realize we had those five backs on the same squad. That's disgusting. How did we not succeed with a stable like that? Oh yeah, our quarterback was playing 500.

We had those 5 backs and W̶h̶i̶p̶p̶l̶e̶ ̶w̶a̶n̶t̶e̶d̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶j̶u̶s̶t̶ ̶t̶h̶r̶o̶w̶ ̶b̶o̶m̶b̶s̶ ̶a̶l̶l̶ ̶g̶a̶m̶e̶ Jackoffy Harris fwckin sucked herp peni!!!!

FIF!

160.gif
 
Hankerson:

2009: 45 rec, 807 yards, 6 TDs
2010: 72 rec, 1,156 yards, 13 TDs

Hurns:

2012: 28 rec, 314 yards, 4 TDs
2013: 62 rec, 1,162 yards, 6 TDs

Not entirely sure why you put their respective 09 and 12 seasons up there since I asked about the 2010 and 2013 seasons but ok. And yes I watch every single game. Looks pretty comparable. Both had **** QBs and you could argue Hurns has to compete with more talented WR's whereas Hank was our ONLY threat that year.

Not only did Hankerson have to deal with Harris getting hurt and replaced by a true freshman Stephen Morris, he also a played a tougher schedule (17th in 2010, versus 44th in 2013) and 2010 had 3 guys catch more than 40 balls (2013 only had one-Hurns) and the RBs also caught more than 40 passes in 2010. Not the case in 2013.

162.gif
 
Advertisement
Hankerson:

2009: 45 rec, 807 yards, 6 TDs
2010: 72 rec, 1,156 yards, 13 TDs

Hurns:

2012: 28 rec, 314 yards, 4 TDs
2013: 62 rec, 1,162 yards, 6 TDs

Not entirely sure why you put their respective 09 and 12 seasons up there since I asked about the 2010 and 2013 seasons but ok. And yes I watch every single game. Looks pretty comparable. Both had **** QBs and you could argue Hurns has to compete with more talented WR's whereas Hank was our ONLY threat that year.

Not only did Hankerson have to deal with Harris getting hurt and replaced by a true freshman Stephen Morris, he also a played a tougher schedule (17th in 2010, versus 44th in 2013) and 2010 had 3 guys catch more than 40 balls (2013 only had one-Hurns) and the RBs also caught more than 40 passes in 2010. Not the case in 2013.

Welp I was wrong. Guess I just got confused by the yards and thought they were comparable.
 
^
So Jacory was just ignoring his coach and kept throwing the ball?

Yep...go watch some tape....see for yourself all the WIDE OPEN BUTT AZS NEKKID WR's running all over the place..


Whipple is a cotdayumn gangsta!!!!

Watch what he does at his new spot..arguably the worst job in the FBS. He is gonna wreck that conference in a couple of years.
 
Hankerson:

2009: 45 rec, 807 yards, 6 TDs
2010: 72 rec, 1,156 yards, 13 TDs

Hurns:

2012: 28 rec, 314 yards, 4 TDs
2013: 62 rec, 1,162 yards, 6 TDs

Not entirely sure why you put their respective 09 and 12 seasons up there since I asked about the 2010 and 2013 seasons but ok. And yes I watch every single game. Looks pretty comparable. Both had **** QBs and you could argue Hurns has to compete with more talented WR's whereas Hank was our ONLY threat that year.

Not only did Hankerson have to deal with Harris getting hurt and replaced by a true freshman Stephen Morris, he also a played a tougher schedule (17th in 2010, versus 44th in 2013) and 2010 had 3 guys catch more than 40 balls (2013 only had one-Hurns) and the RBs also caught more than 40 passes in 2010. Not the case in 2013.

163.gif
 
Back
Top