forums

CFP moving to 24 teams

If it goes through my initial thoughts. I prefer the 12 format just to be clear however:

1-What’s the payout per round if this goes through and what do we keep versus share with ACC? Might be worth staying depending, just maybe!

2- We will see who the best conference is annually with no guess work. Do the sec middle teams get exposed as well as the top 1-3? Also if we have to play 10 p4 teams that tests the depth even further which is something this era has removed from most teams.

3-Does it remove any out of conference games since you would see them in the playoffs? I think it removes neutral sites and curious if home and homes would survive.
 
JgDaCane said:
bc the regular season doesn't mean **** now.
Click to expand...
Stop being dramatic..lol With the old system 90% of college football season was over in September if you lost a game. How is that any fun?

When was the last time UM had less than 2 losses in the last 20 years? We would never sniff the playoffs or chance to play if we left it up to some of you.
 
Texas Cane said:
If it goes through my initial thoughts. I prefer the 12 format just to be clear however:

1-What’s the payout per round if this goes through and what do we keep versus share with ACC? Might be worth staying depending, just maybe!

2- We will see who the best conference is annually with no guess work. Do the sec middle teams get exposed as well as the top 1-3? Also if we have to play 10 p4 teams that tests the depth even further which is something this era has removed from most teams.

3-Does it remove any out of conference games since you would see them in the playoffs? I think it removes neutral sites and curious if home and homes would survive.
Click to expand...

1. Pretty sure keeping money was last year. Now back to sharing.

2. Hopefully it works out that way.

3. Rumor of making 10 conference games. Not sure what happens to 2 OOC games.
 
252cane said:
So you can go 8-4 or 9-3 every year and get in the playoffs. 10 wins and you a lock to get in smh that’s taking away from what made cfb great
Click to expand...
No it doesn’t, it actually makes it fair. Teams like Miami who had a rash of injuries this season would not be over for a loss.
 
Last edited:
Odysseus said:
Exactly I know the guys at the top make significantly more money with these added games but the beating on these players is so high now. Even our own team played 16 games last year and some physical games and now we have to play 16 or 17 to win it this year. The grind is wild guys are really gonna be resting and load management going on.
I know thats why a lot of people on here don't watch NFL because the intensity and consequences of losing regular season games are not there
Click to expand...
If we would have made the acc championship we would have potentially played 17 last year.
 
DMoney said:
Not 24. They are trying to balance too many considerations. ESPN doesn’t even want 24.
Click to expand...
Phat Tuesdays GIF by Prime Video Comedy


What’s next?

large GIF
 
EudocimusAlbus said:
Make sense to expand rosters but those rosters will get more expensive as well, you don't need a two deep you need a 3 deep.
Click to expand...
For real Mario better sign dam near 27 to 30 recruits every cycle. Along with like 10 portal guys to start or depth at least. We need some deep rosters for sure to navigate this, a 3 deep like you mentioned
 
Back
Top