- Joined
- Nov 2, 2011
- Messages
- 4,801
So a sitting member of the CFP committee went on the record with that? Huh….
So a sitting member of the CFP committee went on the record with that? Huh….
In other words the committee full of dumbass ADs are retarded? Lol
Here is the thing that I haven't heard a single person throw out.
"The committee said they will not punish teams for Conference Championship game performance."
Which means BYU when they lose will still remain 11, keeping us at arms length from ND. The whole if we are next to each other they will flip us narrative DOA.
This whole thing is a shame.
Find out which half needs convincing.. We can make our arguments prior to vote..A buddy of mine who used to work at Miami University (OH) spoke with his former colleague, David Sayler, the athletic director at Miami U and a current member of the CFP selection committee. He asked him about ND vs. Miami for the final rankings, and this is what he said:
"If ND and Miami are side-by-side in the rankings, he thinks Miami will surpass ND. But he said there is about half of the committee that firmly believes ND is the better team at this stage. The other half of the committee firmly believes that head-to-head needs to mean something."
Not really surprising. And this doesn't make me think they will actually flip Miami and ND if we do actually end up side-by-side. I'm still assuming they will do whatever it takes to keep ND ahead of us. But this came from someone in the room. Make of it what you like.
They’re going with that so they can try and get out of the H to H requirement.This really dilutes H2H. The requirement is they MUST be side by side with no team in between in order to have H2H influence the rankings. Really deemphasizes H2H to have that requirement.
All this talk of "tiers" and "groupings" and now it is they MUST be side by side
Punish them by dropping them a spot or dropping them out of the playoffs?I tried to tell people that we were not going to magically jump Notre Dame, even when "back-to-back", when the CFPC has repeatedly shown us that they will not do it.
But, yeah, not-smart people can go out and root for Alabama, I guess.
You are the idiot that thinks this dumbasss committee is dropping Bama out of the ******* playoffs altogether lmao.I tried to tell people that we were not going to magically jump Notre Dame, even when "back-to-back", when the CFPC has repeatedly shown us that they will not do it.
But, yeah, not-smart people can go out and root for Alabama, I guess.
Punish them by dropping them a spot or dropping them out of the playoffs?
Dropping Bama a spot would be bad for us.
Dropping them out of the playoffs would be good for us.
So depending on which scenario you expect is what should dictate who you root for.
Then it must clearly have been them playing a brutal Stanford team so well...I’m really not sure how you can take away that ND is even the better team right now when both teams hustled played Pitt two weeks apart. And Pitt OPENLY stated they didn’t have as much reason to care vs ND, it all was riding on GT/Miami. So with everything on the line Miami handled Pitt better than Notre Dame.
I’m worried if byu loses they will stay at 11
Bc losing your conf championship game won’t move them
With that excuse they will keep notre dame ahead
I think the only valid argument (which the committee doesn't use anyways) is:Valid point.
If "losing the SEC-CG" won't cause Alabama to drop, why does anyone think BYU will drop after losing the B12-CG?
We are rooting inconsistently.
I want Team A to win because they won't drop, but I want Team B to lose because they will drop.
Make it make sense...
Then why would the chairman say that idle teams can move up?I’m worried if byu loses they will stay at 11
Bc losing your conf championship game won’t move them
With that excuse they will keep notre dame ahead
It's honestly just wild hubris from a bunch of Athleti, Directors, the chair of which oversees a losing program. They think that "They Know Best", results on the field be damnedI’m really not sure how you can take away that ND is even the better team right now when both teams hustled played Pitt two weeks apart. And Pitt OPENLY stated they didn’t have as much reason to care vs ND, it all was riding on GT/Miami. So with everything on the line Miami handled Pitt better than Notre Dame.
I do not understand the idea that ND right now is better than Miami ? the only victory of note is over a middle of the road SC team........ something stinks with a group that has to constantly change rules to keep everybody happy SEC & NDA buddy of mine who used to work at Miami University (OH) spoke with his former colleague, David Sayler, the athletic director at Miami U and a current member of the CFP selection committee. He asked him about ND vs. Miami for the final rankings, and this is what he said:
"If ND and Miami are side-by-side in the rankings, he thinks Miami will surpass ND. But he said there is about half of the committee that firmly believes ND is the better team at this stage. The other half of the committee firmly believes that head-to-head needs to mean something."
Not really surprising. And this doesn't make me think they will actually flip Miami and ND if we do actually end up side-by-side. I'm still assuming they will do whatever it takes to keep ND ahead of us. But this came from someone in the room. Make of it what you like.