- Joined
- Jan 31, 2012
- Messages
- 1,850
Ahmmon and I go through some numbers:
Depends on the development and play of the OL.
Ahmmon and I go through some numbers:
Having just made it to the NC game, our fans should understand this more than anybody. The skill positions are huge, but the trenches are paramount.Depends on the development and play of the OL.
On the other hand, our O in ‘24 was rarely given a short field.Actually it seems the awful 2024 defense created lots of opportunities for the offense because the other teams scored so quickly.
Forget my last post.Actually it seems the awful 2024 defense created lots of opportunities for the offense because the other teams scored so quickly.
I would argue the 3 biggest metrics for measuring offensive efficiency are:
Yards per play
Adjusted EPA/play
Success Rate
Here is where Miami ranked in all 3 categories in 2025. Now, one reminder, we played 16 games, the last 4 against very good teams. So this isn't totally perfect, but adjusted EPA does take defenses faced into account:
YPP - 34th
Adjusted EPA/Play - T37th
Success Rate - 37th
So, no. No metrics had our offense being efficient. Certainly not as efficient as what we can and should be in 2026. It was an above-average offense. I do agree that explosive plays have a lot to do with this. But of course they do. When you have an explosive, your YPP goes up, your EPA goes up, and it's a successful play. So it all goes into this. We had FAR more explosives in 2025 than we did in 2024. We were #1 in the country BY A MILE in EPA/play and success rate in 2024.
So yes, we need to be much more efficient this year. You can do that by creating more explosives, which I think we will.
Ahmmon and I go through some numbers:
Forget my last post.
@Trafficante just posted stat comps where our starting field position was a half yard better in ‘25 than ‘24.
Ahmmon and I go through some numbers:
Doesn't Santo Mario's reliance on TUFF N FYZICAL skew Miami's YPP downward vs pass happy teams (e.g. Lane Kiffin, etc...)?Yards per game is a ****** metric. Obviously being sky high in it means you have a great offense, but pace dictates so much of that. Yards per play is a much better indicator of true efficiency.
In 2024, we averaged 7.56 yards per play. Here's the ranks the last 5 years:
2021 - #2 (Ohio State averaged 7.96 YPP)
2022 - #1
2023 - #3 (LSU averaged 8.49 YPP, Oregon averaged 7.63 YPP)
2024 - #1
2025 - #1
So, that 2024 offense was the 4th best offense of the last 5 years on a per play basis. Absolutely insane. If we land directly in the middle of 2024 and 2025, here's where we'd be:
2024 YPP - 7.56
2025 YPP - 5.96
Dead middle is 6.76 YPP. Here's where 6.76 YPP ranks you the last 5 years:
2025 - 8th
2024 - 4th
2023 - 11th
2022 - 11th
2021 - 6th
I'm with you, I think this offense can and should finish right around here. Roughly 10th in yards per play and scoring offense is a reasonable expectation. I do not expect 2024 levels with the defense being what it is. Just look at the defenses of the teams who had better offenses than our 2024 version:
2021 Ohio State -- 40th in YPP allowed
2023 LSU -- 103rd in YPP allowed
2023 Oregon - 22nd in YPP allowed
2024 Miami was 48th in YPP allowed
Usually, teams who have the #1 offense in the country do so out of necessity. Their defense isn't very good. I talked about this in my post yesterday ITT. I don't think Miami will have the 40th, or 103rd, etc ranked defense this year. So we won't need the #1 offense.
Top 10 on both sides of the ball pretty much has you as the best team in the country. I'm shooting for 6.5+ YPP on offense and 4.75 YPP allowed on defense. If we do that, we're playing for a natty again.
Who was a proven guy that we had coming in?This is simply not true.
The secondary was unquestionably the biggest story. Arroyo had shown glimpses and we knew he was the guy if healthy. We have no clue what Lofton can actually do or if anyone behind him can play. He isn't an inline TE so who is the actual starter?Who was a proven guy that we had coming in?
Orroyo hadn’t played much at all. If you look at stats coming into the year Lofton is way farther ahead. He played through injuries all last year too. Im not saying that Lofton is better or even close, im just saying that we didn’t know if Orroyo would even make it through a full season let alone be as good as he was. Lofton had actual game footage of him playing, blocking for two years. To say he can’t take the next step with a weight loss and a healthy body/mind is WILD!The secondary was unquestionably the biggest story. Arroyo had shown glimpses and we knew he was the guy if healthy. We have no clue what Lofton can actually do or if anyone behind him can play. He isn't an inline TE so who is the actual starter?
I'm OK with a disagreement. You obviously have Lofton on the D$ pantheon. I hope he balls out this year.Orroyo hadn’t played much at all. If you look at stats coming into the year Lofton is way farther ahead. He played through injuries all last year too. Im not saying that Lofton is better or even close, im just saying that we didn’t know if Orroyo would even make it through a full season let alone be as good as he was. Lofton had actual game footage of him playing, blocking for two years. To say he can’t take the next step with a weight loss and a healthy body/mind is WILD!
Ahmmon and I go through some numbers:
If the OL news is true and we may start the season down a starter on an OL that was already not the deepest unit, I don’t think we get to the 2024 offense.