jkaz1
Senior
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2012
- Messages
- 4,667
Based on nothing.
This poster is spewing dog dookie again. Par for the course.
This poster is spewing dog dookie again. Par for the course.
based on what exactly?
based on what exactly?
Mallory is the better player why not play him ?
Tad, we do have nice things. Unfortunately, we all want more or less...more 5* players, less injuries, more bagmen, less of the NCAA ******* with us, etc.My mental health would probably be sooooo much better if I could somehow just mute all updates from campus from now until the morning of Aug. 24.
Can we EVER just have nice things?!!!
Tad, we do have nice things. Unfortunately, we all want more or less...more 5* players, less injuries, more bagmen, less of the NCAA ******* with us, etc.
Yeah we all think Mallory is the next Olsen but dude trippingBased on nothing.
This poster is spewing dog dookie again. Par for the course.
Both are studsMallory is the better player why not play him ?
FYI, Brevin was seen with his knee wrapped and limping.
If Mallory gets in first reps he aint giving that spot back IMO. I know that people will say otherwise and I get it but I will go against the grain on this one. Always felt JM has thebhigher upside and BJ is a beast as wellMallory is the better player why not play him ?
Seems like what you'd expect out of a hyperextension, based on what 247 is reporting
Agree but he looks way different this year.....BJ was more cfb readyMallory didn't impress my last year. He looked fragile to me. Hopefully, strength and conditioning gets him right.
The system in place last year was not one where two TEs could put up any stats. Or even one for that matter. Mallory would be a huge weapon in the right O. Jordan fits into just about any O and is a major weapon. I'm just glad we have a staff that, I believe, will get the most out of both of them.Mallory didn't impress my last year. He looked fragile to me. Hopefully, strength and conditioning gets him right.