If the NCAA’s rules were enforceable, Charlie Baker wouldn’t be crying to Congress that the NCAA can’t enforce its own rules.
I think you’re viewing this like a Miami fan. All those comments about “notorious cowboy corruption” in Texas courts- how do you think the rest of the country sees us?
When the NCAA and conference lobbyists complain about the Wild West of college sports, the Lucas and Mensah sagas will be listed in the same chapter as this Sorsby debacle. And it doesn’t matter, because Lucas and Mensah are still suiting up for us.
Programs like FSU and Clemson have been crying about what college football should be. We’re winning because we are playing it as it is.
Look, Charlie Baker is a ****nut. He is trying to have his cake and eat it too. He is trying to trick the Congress into giving back to the NCAA its financial and transfer control, without having to go the route of a collective bargaining agreement. This is not because "rules were unenforceable", it' is because the NCAA wants to go back to enforcing CERTAIN rules related to compensation and transfers.
As for being a "Miami fan", I made the comments about Texas courts HAVING NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS CASE. This is merely the latest in a long line of forum-shopping/home-cooking wins coming out of Texas.
As for how the rest of the country sees us, I could give a ****. Again, if Miami tampered with Mensah, then please have the NCAA file charges and go after us. We did not "get away with" actually "stealing" Mensah ("stealing" was your word, not mine) by filing a lawsuit in South Florida. Last time I checked, Duke sued Mensah IN NORTH CAROLINA and did not prevail. I'm really not sure why you keep throwing Miami under the bus here.
The NCAA and conference lobbyists can complain about Miami until they turn blue in the face. ****, I'm built for this. Remember when the corrupt Texas cowboys whined and complained about Evil Miami in the 1990 Cotton Bowl, so much so that the NCAA passed a whole SLATE of "Miami rules"? Yeah, why stop now?
But to compare an individual player gambling on his own sport/team to Miami (under Cristobal) paying players legally and taking transfers legally...is just a weird flex.
We are winning because we finally hired the coach we should have hired years ago. Do you think Mario would have failed before the NIL/Portal era? I acknowledge that Mario has adapted to the new era, but he was a helluva recruiter at every prior coaching stop. And a **** good developer of line talent. So, no, I'm not going to attribute all of Miami's "winning" to NIL or the Portal, even though both are elements of our success.
It's very simple, I just want to play by the same set of rules, whether that is NO PAYMENT of players or ACTUAL PAYMENT of players. Whether that is NO PORTAL or YES PORTAL. Just give us the same set of rules, and Mario will compete and (usually) win.
Is it POSSIBLE to have an honest conversation about betting on one's own sport/team without shouting "BUT MIAMI!!!"...because that would be nice.