forums

Brashard Smith calls out Gattis on Twitter (and then deletes it)

JHallCanes said:
This is the first I’m hearing this

I’m going to do some digging and see what I come up with
Click to expand...
Most Michigan fans were frustrated with Gattis. Michigan obviously had a great season last year primarily because they had a great offensive line and defense but before last year most Michigan fans wanted him gone. You guys should cut your losses...he's holding back your program.
 
Advertisement
Mroad said:
Most Michigan fans were frustrated with Gattis. Michigan obviously had a great season last year primarily because they had a great offensive line and defense but before last year most Michigan fans wanted him gone. You guys should cut your losses...he's holding back your program.
Click to expand...
You are blowing my mind with this ground breaking news

Thank you so much for this enlightenment

Got anymore inside info for us?
 
nystateofmind said:
Let me explain.

Five days ago, SMD sent out a Tweet which read: “Miami OC Josh Gattis said he doesn't want Brashard Smith spending as much time on the sideline. Coaches are trying to get the ball in his hands as much as possible.”

Again, that Tweet and that quote are five days old.

After the game last night, Smith re-tweeted the Tweet and put only a period as his response. On Twitter, this typically indicates that the user AGREES with the original tweet. The period acts a proverbial exclamation point on the original statement.

However, in this instance, it was done in a facetious matter.

As we all saw, Smith barely played last night.

So by taking the old quote and adding the period, he was taking a shot at Gattis and essentially saying: “Hey look, you told the media a few days you wanted me to get more involved, but tonight I barely played. How does that make sense?”

The confusion on here arose because it wasn’t clear initially in the way I formatted the exchange that the Gattis quote was five days old.

Some posters thought the Gattis quote was from last night and that Smith’s period was a legitimate agreement and not him making a statement.

Once I clarified the quote was five days old, it became abundantly clear to everyone what was going on.

To further reinforce this, Smith deleted the Tweet after about 20 minutes.
Click to expand...

Imagine including all this up front…
 
Mroad said:
Most Michigan fans were frustrated with Gattis. Michigan obviously had a great season last year primarily because they had a great offensive line and defense but before last year most Michigan fans wanted him gone. You guys should cut your losses...he's holding back your program.
Click to expand...
Michigan fan?

I guess yall cool.
Loved the Fab 5.
So yeah, u cool.

@flagator86 assist this MeatChicken fan around the campus, plz
 
DTP said:
I have no idea why that dude walks around with play sheets in his pants. He’s never called a play.
Click to expand...
It’s two sided. It has 3 timeouts on the front & 3 on the back. Just a gentle reminder. When he uses one, it vibrates the front of his trousers.
 
have we even run a rb screen this year?

i know breshard is a wr but the talk about screens got me thinking about it. i can't recall a single instance where we ran an rb screen to knighton or anyone
 
nystateofmind said:
Let me explain.

Five days ago, SMD sent out a Tweet which read: “Miami OC Josh Gattis said he doesn't want Brashard Smith spending as much time on the sideline. Coaches are trying to get the ball in his hands as much as possible.”

Again, that Tweet and that quote are five days old.

After the game last night, Smith re-tweeted the Tweet and put only a period as his response. On Twitter, this typically indicates that the user AGREES with the original tweet. The period acts a proverbial exclamation point on the original statement.

However, in this instance, it was done in a facetious matter.

As we all saw, Smith barely played last night.

So by taking the old quote and adding the period, he was taking a shot at Gattis and essentially saying: “Hey look, you told the media a few days you wanted me to get more involved, but tonight I barely played. How does that make sense?”

The confusion on here arose because it wasn’t clear initially in the way I formatted the exchange that the Gattis quote was five days old.

Some posters thought the Gattis quote was from last night and that Smith’s period was a legitimate agreement and not him making a statement.

Once I clarified the quote was five days old, it became abundantly clear to everyone what was going on.

To further reinforce this, Smith deleted the Tweet after about 20 minutes.
Click to expand...

That was beautiful lol.
 
Advertisement
nystateofmind said:
Not as beautiful as you.

:)
Click to expand...

57935E09-532A-4EE1-8C6B-0376C5303E20.gif
 
HurricanePhilly said:
My guess is these kids would like if Gattis wasn’t on the sideline
Click to expand...

Him and probably every UM fan, former player, and current player.

IF Gaddis isn't gone in a couple weeks - I'll get back into UM football when Mario is gone.

Stupid is doing the same, stupid crap over and over. Manny ruined his first season with ENOS.

Stupid!

THen WHAT does Mario do?

Same, stupid siht.
 
UMFarArcher said:
Him and probably every UM fan, former player, and current player.

IF Gaddis isn't gone in a couple weeks - I'll get back into UM football when Mario is gone.

Stupid is doing the same, stupid crap over and over. Manny ruined his first season with ENOS.

Stupid!

THen WHAT does Mario do?

Same, stupid siht.
Click to expand...
I didn’t pay attention to Mario at Oregon tbh

Does he have a track record of evaluating talent? Not just recruiting but coaching?

Like Butch always comes up. Fielded elite teams but also elite coaching staffs.

So did Mario just get caught up in the hype (Broyles winner) with Gattis, and the name recognition of Steele?

Did he have a track record of finding under the radar recruits or just getting a lot of 4 and 5 stars?

I was never a big fan of his (not against him of course) so I didn’t really follow along and I don’t really remember this conversation when he was hired.
 
You gotta be somewhat simple minded to hire an OC from MIchigan.

Mario's main fault is he wants to micromanage. Hired ALL the coaches.

That's no way to run anything.

He better hire some top coordinators - tell them they're responsible for results - as he's given them the authority over their personnel. They hire, they fire - and if they don't perform - they hit the road, too.

Why did high schools embrace the spread? It was simple to learn - and effective.

We saw our QB last season light it up pretty good. Saw TWO QB's do well with it.

So who is the stupid SOB that wanted to get away from it - and make it complicated?

And who is the stupid SOB that ALLOWED it?
 
Back
Top