Anybody that gives credence to this report, and any site/organization that uses this as a reporting reference, is/are imbecile(s).
One jagoff writing "sources close to the program" is not what's considered reliable. Especially someone who's never either been heard of, nor is known to be close to the program.
The issue isn't some unethical attention seeker putting out made-up information for clickbait.
The issue is the low-intelligence and lack of critical thinking skills exhibited by anyone that gives credence to this.