Why do people keep saying if dno goes the d will stay the same. If d no goes that means we can't run this crap no more and whoever golden hires lik h is OCs will most likely be calling the plays from there own scheme.We will not run that horrendous "Multiple D" again .
The argument is that this is Golden's scheme and Dorito is just his puppet, ergo Golden would just bring in another puppet to run the same scheme. I'm not 100% convinced that this is true. It very well might be Golden's scheme, but if the BOT is willing to go so far as to force Golden to fire his best friend, I don't see why they wouldn't also demand that he implement a new scheme and hire a DC with a new philosophy.
With that all said, this is a moot point as I noted above. Golden would rather get fired himself than be forced to fire his buddy.
If the decision comes from above, I can see Golden rolling with it and things getting much better. Golden is a politician first, coach second. He (and/or his wife) must know that his market value is far below his current contract price. Donna's **** (aka: Blake James) forcing Al's hand in firing dorito would surely fire a shot across the bow that Golden would receive.
Im very hopeful that this is the correct move. As Ive been saying, literally every aspect of the program is better now than it was when Golden took over with the exception of defensive on-field performance. Since Al's arrival:
* The offensive talent is better
* The defensive talent is better
* Offensive on-field performance is better
* Special teams are better
* Strength and conditioning are better
The only thing that has gotten worse since Al's arrival is defensive on-field performance. It's clear to anyone with a pulse that the relationship between Golden and his boy is at the heart of the issue.
Here's hoping that Donna's **** does the right thing after today.
