Bo or Cook

Which one is a better RB?


  • Total voters
    269
Advertisement
Advertisement
Bo's combo of size and speed is other worldly! Has there been a physical freak like him since Sean?

And he's a better compliment to Duke and Yearby
 
Advertisement
This is for those who are incorrectly stereotyping Scarborough as just a "bruiser" because he's a 220+ pound back.

6'2", 225 pounds, 4.45 40. Freak athlete. Absolute monster.

[video=youtube;OJwMRXxrzKc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJwMRXxrzKc[/video]

Celtic music + athletic/genetic freak = wow, gimme this kid
 
this will be us


494.gif
 
Advertisement
Bo runs a 4.59. Both are elite talents.

Bo is much better catching the ball I do not think he is a better runner than cook. Bo has nice bend when running through in between the tackles. Cook has a burst that can't be matched by any other back in the country. And for all those that haven't seen cook play live, dude runs hard as **** and is not afraid of contact. Can't go wrong with either.

Haven't seen Bo play to make the choice.

/ would take probably take cook
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Advertisement
Sometimes you have a feeling when someone is going to be special, and sometimes you just know. With this kid you know he is going to be. imagine Bo, Duke, and Yearby in the backfield... just wouldn't be fair lol
 
Can't I have both? They are both studs. I would take Cook by a very narrow margin as the better back. Now, as a guy who bleeds orange and green, I'd rather have Bo in our class. He compliments Duke and Year by better.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top