Unless Coker was made Head Coach in the last three or four minutes, that has to be the dumbest question I ever heard.
Got one for you. Ever see a timely adjustment during a game that stopped what our opponent was doing, or an adjustment to take advantage of what our opponent was doing?
Didn't think so.
''Unless Coker was made Head Coach in the last three or four minutes, that has to be the dumbest question I ever heard.''
Hahaha, GTFOOH, the dumbest question you ever heard on this board?
Coker won a NC on the other coaches players, he sucked. They didn't need a great coach on that 2001 because they had great talent. Coker sucked at recruiting too. If Golden keeps up with this recruiting, talent will be more important than anything else, as far as I'm concerned the jury is out. Golden's hands have been tied up to this point, he had very little talent at all as you can see by how many great players we had drafted in the past 3 years. Couldn't get a great QB to come here with the NCAA looking down our throat. We had a handful of real good players come here in the past 3 years, you don't win **** with that.
How about you train ten under sized geeks with all your experience and let them fight some kick *** fighters hand to hand who have never been trained. Your guys would still get their asses kicked, it is what it is. Talent rules! If one of our QB's play well we have a great chance to have a real good season, we have talent but not where it needs to be to win against top teams, again, it is what it is. We don't know what Golden can do with top talent, we haven't had it yet. We have some very good talent in some area's but in others we are in trouble.
Saban had the absolute top recruited talent he still lost 2 games. If you don't think the NCAA had a huge amount to do with our average football classes you really haven't paid attention. You think it really matters who coaches Chad? Guy is going pro because of his talent. We had one great rb last year, no D line, a bad QB, one very good LBer and a bunch of young players that Golden recruited. You really want to count Golden's first year of recruiting? lol
Next year is the year we see if Golden can coach, when he has a good QB that's been in the system for more than 3 months. Come on now!
We didn't have the talent to adjust to anything!
In the first place, Coker was here ten years ago, thus your connection is a broke-*** connection and makes no sense at all.
Just for your edification, I have taken undersized men - all thin, all illiterate, all just past stone-age development. More than ten though. And no one is going to ever fight to another's strengths - which is why I know for a fact that you don't know WTF you speak of.
The kill ratio of the US Army troops with artillery support, air support, top equipment, and educated, experienced a 4:1 documented kill ratio.
Those "undersized" illiterates we trained? They enjoyed a documented 33:1 kill ratio. That's eight times better performance than US troops.
Oh. And they weren't talented at all. Had to start from scratch. And we were arming them with WWII/Korea era weapons.
Don't ever presume to know WTF you're talking about when it comes who what I know, what I do, or what I've done. You don't know siht.
You guys always are saying, "Next year . . . " Three years gone, this one upon us, and you're wanting yet another! You're a jenius.
We had weeks, not years to win out fights, including preparation.
''Just for your edification, I have taken undersized men - all thin, all illiterate, all just past stone-age development. More than ten though. And no one is going to ever fight to another's strengths - which is why I know for a fact that you don't know WTF you speak of.''
Learn to read, I said hand to hand, can't bring guns on a football field either, SMH!
You can train all the 120 pound geeks all you want, hand to hand they will get their asses kicked 95+% of the time from a good 200lb street fighter don't care what you think. I said it again, hand to hand, no tanks, no rifles, no hand guns, no knifes or no bazooka's lol. Again I said geeks.
Just like on the football field a team with loads of talent will crush a team with much less talent. You can't teach speed, quickness, or someone with natural ability. I watched Duke in HS, nobody could control him because he was just too **** talented, a bunch of less talented kids were never going to stop him even if Bill Belichick was coaching them. Don't turn this into something stupid, I said geeks, I compare them to less talented football players.
I brought up Coker to show even a bad coach could win with superior talent, I thought you would put 2 and 2 together, my bad!
You're the one who needs reading comprehension. I already told you. Only an idiot would fight to the opponent's strengths. ****, you're too dumb to understand that. Why in **** would someone at a distinct disadvantage size wise, fight his fight? Just because you proposed it?
How about being smarter. Teach them to use equalizers. Your examples and your logic are as retarded as any typical kid who wants to get into discussions with grown men. Maybe you should sit this out for a few years until you've actually gotten some real life experiences that may or may not be pertinent to the topic of the moment.
Why would you suggest that weapons can't be used on a football field? Did anyone suggest such a thing? Besides you?
You're the ****** who brought up my experience, and then you are the dumbass who referred to training little people. I did that. So what's your ****** point? Why do you talk in circles, just to contrive an argument? You ask a question - assuming that I've maybe never done anything like that - and when you find out I have, you alter the argument again, like a snot-nosed punk.
Coker was NOT handed fresh, all freshmen five-stars. You simple minded idiot - they had lots of game experience, and didn't need a whole lot of coaching the basics!
It wasn't talent! It was
experienced talent! ****, how can anyone be so intentionally stupid? Never seen anyone cherry pick so few variables, and then paint a wide canvass with it like you do.
Coming to CIS at times and having to listen to outright uninformed BS like this poster continually puts out does provide me with lots of laughs, but at the same time, I am baffled how in Hades someone like this could get past the sixth grade.
''You're the one who needs reading comprehension. I already told you. Only an idiot would fight to the opponent's strengths. ****, you're too dumb to understand that. Why in **** would someone at a distinct disadvantage size wise, fight his fight? Just because you proposed it?''
You have got to be kidding me? I was comparing apples to apples, you want to give the geeks weapons, lol. You think you could have trained the kids Duke played against well enough to stop him? Didn't matter what size his opponents were they couldn't stop him because he had superior talent. The geek could fight any way he wanted without weapons, lol. Just making a point your geek boys would get their asses kicked almost every single time against a superior opponent, there is no other point I'm trying to make, get it?
''How about being smarter. Teach them to use equalizers.''
I guess every coach Duke faced was not as smart as you, so how would you have stopped Duke? lol Can't wait to hear this one! Some times there is no equalizer that can be taught, sometimes someone is just plain and simple superior in what they do.
''Why would you suggest that weapons can't be used on a football field? Did anyone suggest such a thing? Besides you?''
I brought up hand to hand combat and you bring up weapons, lol.
''You're the ****** who brought up my experience, and then you are the dumbass who referred to training little people. I did that. So what's your ****** point?
My point was, since you can't get it on your own, you can't train inferior talent to beat superior talent 95% of the time and Miami has had inferior talent under Golden because of the NCAA ****. Get it?
''assuming that I've maybe never done anything like that - and when you find out I have, you alter the argument again''
I know you've done it, I've probably seen 500 of your posts, You added weapons to the geeks, I said hand to hand, sorry you can't read.
''Coker was NOT handed fresh, all freshmen five-stars. You simple minded idiot - they had lots of game experience, and didn't need a whole lot of coaching the basics! ''
That was not my point, my point was he was handed great talent and he sucked as a coach and still won a NC, How the **** can't you understand something so Fin simple???????
My exact words, WTF?
''I brought up Coker to show even a bad coach could win with superior talent, I thought you would put 2 and 2 together, my bad!''
''It wasn't talent! It was experienced talent!"
And Coker still won even though he was a bad coach, ****!
''Coming to CIS at times and having to listen to outright uninformed BS like this poster continually puts out does provide me with lots of laughs, but at the same time, I am baffled how in Hades someone like this could get past the sixth grade. ''
Right back atcha!
