Best Tweet; This One Says it All

Ha. I get it, you turned my calling you *** around on me. Your sharp. But the fact that you are counting the next class already actually reveals the true joke that I assumed you were a woman (and not ***) since you have such flawed logic.

So you'r just gonna ignore the class that just came in?

mmmmmmmm
496.gif

I'm certainly going to ignore any class coming in until they hit the field with results. I think Willie Williams and Ray Ray Armstrong (among many, many others) would have proved that. You keep telling me that many in the picture haven't played a down yet. You are proving my point.

Maybe you can watch the "new groceries" play before saying its not enough. or nah?

LMAO!! Try again...

472.jpg

Certainly I will. That is the purpose of my original post above where I said 'let's win the coastal before we crown anyone as enough talent'. So that clearly states that I will hold judgment until that result is determined. My then response to the poster that questioned it stated I disagreed with whatever point you were trying to make by posting that picture as though it was a valid response. As though all those players already have a quantifiable value on the field in college play. So it isn't grasping at straws. or nah?

/did I use 'or nah?' right? Not sure.

You're all over the place, focus for a little bit.

Person a says not enough talent being recruited.

Person b shows a pic of young talent that was just recruited.

Person c has panties in a bunch and says not enough talent.
Person c also said "
you show what we currently have. Which has already been determined as 'not enough' "
Person c also said "I'm certainly going to ignore any class coming in until they hit the field with results. "

Saying what we currently have is not enough and including the freshnmen talent who just arrived as "already determined is 'not enough' is pretty dumb. Then saying you are holding judgement?

Soooooooo, which one is it? Has is been determined we dont have enough, including the new guys? or are you gonna wait to hold judgement?
 
Advertisement
So you'r just gonna ignore the class that just came in?

mmmmmmmm
496.gif

I'm certainly going to ignore any class coming in until they hit the field with results. I think Willie Williams and Ray Ray Armstrong (among many, many others) would have proved that. You keep telling me that many in the picture haven't played a down yet. You are proving my point.

Maybe you can watch the "new groceries" play before saying its not enough. or nah?

LMAO!! Try again...

472.jpg

Certainly I will. That is the purpose of my original post above where I said 'let's win the coastal before we crown anyone as enough talent'. So that clearly states that I will hold judgment until that result is determined. My then response to the poster that questioned it stated I disagreed with whatever point you were trying to make by posting that picture as though it was a valid response. As though all those players already have a quantifiable value on the field in college play. So it isn't grasping at straws. or nah?

/did I use 'or nah?' right? Not sure.

You're all over the place, focus for a little bit.

Person a says not enough talent being recruited.

Person b shows a pic of young talent that was just recruited.

Person c has panties in a bunch and says not enough talent.
Person c also said "
you show what we currently have. Which has already been determined as 'not enough' "
Person c also said "I'm certainly going to ignore any class coming in until they hit the field with results. "

Saying what we currently have is not enough and including the freshnmen talent who just arrived as "already determined is 'not enough' is pretty dumb. Then saying you are holding judgement?

Soooooooo, which one is it? Has is been determined we dont have enough, including the new guys? or are you gonna wait to hold judgement?

How are both of those mutually exclusive? You are taking specific comments out of context of the post and supporting your argument. I can determine that we don't have enough in terms of the guys we currently have that are active starting roster players from last year. And can still reserve judgment on the new guys coming in that haven't been redshirted or activated yet. We certainly dont have enough experienced talent. The odds (again odds, not saying they cant or wont) of us having recruited several immediate impact true freshmen this past class (a la Stacey Coley) is highly unlikely.

All I can do is base my opinion on evidence of past games, and the evidence is bleak. When the season starts, and I'm proven wrong I will certainly change my tune. A rational person just has to see evidence before making proclamations. I certainly don't get excited for any 2015 or 2016 recruits considering plenty can happen between new and Feb 2015 and Feb 2016 where the classes could look quite different.
 
I'm certainly going to ignore any class coming in until they hit the field with results. I think Willie Williams and Ray Ray Armstrong (among many, many others) would have proved that. You keep telling me that many in the picture haven't played a down yet. You are proving my point.

Maybe you can watch the "new groceries" play before saying its not enough. or nah?

LMAO!! Try again...

472.jpg

Certainly I will. That is the purpose of my original post above where I said 'let's win the coastal before we crown anyone as enough talent'. So that clearly states that I will hold judgment until that result is determined. My then response to the poster that questioned it stated I disagreed with whatever point you were trying to make by posting that picture as though it was a valid response. As though all those players already have a quantifiable value on the field in college play. So it isn't grasping at straws. or nah?

/did I use 'or nah?' right? Not sure.

You're all over the place, focus for a little bit.

Person a says not enough talent being recruited.

Person b shows a pic of young talent that was just recruited.

Person c has panties in a bunch and says not enough talent.
Person c also said "
you show what we currently have. Which has already been determined as 'not enough' "
Person c also said "I'm certainly going to ignore any class coming in until they hit the field with results. "

Saying what we currently have is not enough and including the freshnmen talent who just arrived as "already determined is 'not enough' is pretty dumb. Then saying you are holding judgement?

Soooooooo, which one is it? Has is been determined we dont have enough, including the new guys? or are you gonna wait to hold judgement?

How are both of those mutually exclusive? You are taking specific comments out of context of the post and supporting your argument. I can determine that we don't have enough in terms of the guys we currently have that are active starting roster players from last year. And can still reserve judgment on the new guys coming in that haven't been redshirted or activated yet. We certainly dont have enough experienced talent. The odds (again odds, not saying they cant or wont) of us having recruited several immediate impact true freshmen this past class (a la Stacey Coley) is highly unlikely.

All I can do is base my opinion on evidence of past games, and the evidence is bleak. When the season starts, and I'm proven wrong I will certainly change my tune. A rational person just has to see evidence before making proclamations. I certainly don't get excited for any 2015 or 2016 recruits considering plenty can happen between new and Feb 2015 and Feb 2016 where the classes could look quite different.

LMAO, niner getting schooled ... again!
 
niner getting dominated again. What an *** clown. This guy can't really comprehend that even if our freshman class is full of incredible football players (highly unlikely), it doesn't make up for the lack of upper-class talent recruited by Golden.
 
I'm certainly going to ignore any class coming in until they hit the field with results. I think Willie Williams and Ray Ray Armstrong (among many, many others) would have proved that. You keep telling me that many in the picture haven't played a down yet. You are proving my point.

Maybe you can watch the "new groceries" play before saying its not enough. or nah?

LMAO!! Try again...

472.jpg

Certainly I will. That is the purpose of my original post above where I said 'let's win the coastal before we crown anyone as enough talent'. So that clearly states that I will hold judgment until that result is determined. My then response to the poster that questioned it stated I disagreed with whatever point you were trying to make by posting that picture as though it was a valid response. As though all those players already have a quantifiable value on the field in college play. So it isn't grasping at straws. or nah?

/did I use 'or nah?' right? Not sure.

You're all over the place, focus for a little bit.

Person a says not enough talent being recruited.

Person b shows a pic of young talent that was just recruited.

Person c has panties in a bunch and says not enough talent.
Person c also said "
you show what we currently have. Which has already been determined as 'not enough' "
Person c also said "I'm certainly going to ignore any class coming in until they hit the field with results. "

Saying what we currently have is not enough and including the freshnmen talent who just arrived as "already determined is 'not enough' is pretty dumb. Then saying you are holding judgement? Soooooooo, which one is it? Has is been determined we dont have enough, including the new guys? or are you gonna wait to hold judgement?

How are both of those mutually exclusive? You are taking specific comments out of context of the post and supporting your argument. I can determine that we don't have enough in terms of the guys we currently have that are active starting roster players from last year. And can still reserve judgment on the new guys coming in that haven't been redshirted or activated yet. We certainly dont have enough experienced talent. The odds (again odds, not saying they cant or wont) of us having recruited several immediate impact true freshmen this past class (a la Stacey Coley) is highly unlikely.

All I can do is base my opinion on evidence of past games, and the evidence is bleak. When the season starts, and I'm proven wrong I will certainly change my tune. A rational person just has to see evidence before making proclamations. I certainly don't get excited for any 2015 or 2016 recruits considering plenty can happen between new and Feb 2015 and Feb 2016 where the classes could look quite different.

context is there, YOU typed it. LMAO!

You should not prance in to the rescue if you are gonna jump all over the place, talmbout "mutually exclusive" LMAO!

You went from "we dont get enough" to "we dont have enough now" to "I have already made my decision because of last year" to "I have to wait and see" .

typical mope city.

pssss - Chad, Yearby, Berrios, and a few others are gonna play this year. They gonna be good, and you know who you can thank for getting them here. lol

We gonna win baby! be happy!
 
Maybe you can watch the "new groceries" play before saying its not enough. or nah?

LMAO!! Try again...

472.jpg

Certainly I will. That is the purpose of my original post above where I said 'let's win the coastal before we crown anyone as enough talent'. So that clearly states that I will hold judgment until that result is determined. My then response to the poster that questioned it stated I disagreed with whatever point you were trying to make by posting that picture as though it was a valid response. As though all those players already have a quantifiable value on the field in college play. So it isn't grasping at straws. or nah?

/did I use 'or nah?' right? Not sure.

You're all over the place, focus for a little bit.

Person a says not enough talent being recruited.

Person b shows a pic of young talent that was just recruited.

Person c has panties in a bunch and says not enough talent.
Person c also said "
you show what we currently have. Which has already been determined as 'not enough' "
Person c also said "I'm certainly going to ignore any class coming in until they hit the field with results. "

Saying what we currently have is not enough and including the freshnmen talent who just arrived as "already determined is 'not enough' is pretty dumb. Then saying you are holding judgement? Soooooooo, which one is it? Has is been determined we dont have enough, including the new guys? or are you gonna wait to hold judgement?

How are both of those mutually exclusive? You are taking specific comments out of context of the post and supporting your argument. I can determine that we don't have enough in terms of the guys we currently have that are active starting roster players from last year. And can still reserve judgment on the new guys coming in that haven't been redshirted or activated yet. We certainly dont have enough experienced talent. The odds (again odds, not saying they cant or wont) of us having recruited several immediate impact true freshmen this past class (a la Stacey Coley) is highly unlikely.

All I can do is base my opinion on evidence of past games, and the evidence is bleak. When the season starts, and I'm proven wrong I will certainly change my tune. A rational person just has to see evidence before making proclamations. I certainly don't get excited for any 2015 or 2016 recruits considering plenty can happen between new and Feb 2015 and Feb 2016 where the classes could look quite different.

context is there, YOU typed it. LMAO!

You should not prance in to the rescue if you are gonna jump all over the place, talmbout "mutually exclusive" LMAO!

You went from "we dont get enough" to "we dont have enough now" to "I have already made my decision because of last year" to "I have to wait and see" .

typical mope city.

pssss - Chad, Yearby, Berrios, and a few others are gonna play this year. They gonna be good, and you know who you can thank for getting them here. lol

We gonna win baby! be happy!
Win what? 3rd place in the coastal? The games against A&M and Arkansas State? Define win.
 
Certainly I will. That is the purpose of my original post above where I said 'let's win the coastal before we crown anyone as enough talent'. So that clearly states that I will hold judgment until that result is determined. My then response to the poster that questioned it stated I disagreed with whatever point you were trying to make by posting that picture as though it was a valid response. As though all those players already have a quantifiable value on the field in college play. So it isn't grasping at straws. or nah?

/did I use 'or nah?' right? Not sure.

You're all over the place, focus for a little bit.

Person a says not enough talent being recruited.

Person b shows a pic of young talent that was just recruited.

Person c has panties in a bunch and says not enough talent.
Person c also said "
you show what we currently have. Which has already been determined as 'not enough' "
Person c also said "I'm certainly going to ignore any class coming in until they hit the field with results. "

Saying what we currently have is not enough and including the freshnmen talent who just arrived as "already determined is 'not enough' is pretty dumb. Then saying you are holding judgement? Soooooooo, which one is it? Has is been determined we dont have enough, including the new guys? or are you gonna wait to hold judgement?

How are both of those mutually exclusive? You are taking specific comments out of context of the post and supporting your argument. I can determine that we don't have enough in terms of the guys we currently have that are active starting roster players from last year. And can still reserve judgment on the new guys coming in that haven't been redshirted or activated yet. We certainly dont have enough experienced talent. The odds (again odds, not saying they cant or wont) of us having recruited several immediate impact true freshmen this past class (a la Stacey Coley) is highly unlikely.

All I can do is base my opinion on evidence of past games, and the evidence is bleak. When the season starts, and I'm proven wrong I will certainly change my tune. A rational person just has to see evidence before making proclamations. I certainly don't get excited for any 2015 or 2016 recruits considering plenty can happen between new and Feb 2015 and Feb 2016 where the classes could look quite different.

context is there, YOU typed it. LMAO!

You should not prance in to the rescue if you are gonna jump all over the place, talmbout "mutually exclusive" LMAO!

You went from "we dont get enough" to "we dont have enough now" to "I have already made my decision because of last year" to "I have to wait and see" .

typical mope city.

pssss - Chad, Yearby, Berrios, and a few others are gonna play this year. They gonna be good, and you know who you can thank for getting them here. lol

We gonna win baby! be happy!
Win what? 3rd place in the coastal? The games against A&M and Arkansas State? Define win.

Dont be mad, lol.

One game at a time little buddy.

Beat Louisville first, then worry about the next game!

We gonna win baby! be happy!
 
Advertisement
great bump. good gawd niner is a ******* idiot. only porster dumber I've seen is maybe DerpU83

what a raging little ******* niner is. talks all kinds of nonsense. looks like a drooling idiot, then disappears

**** sucker
 
They will all return after we beat FAMU next year by 11 points in a last second nail biter....WE BACK
 
Mods did Niner simply change his name or did he actually runaway from the board after the UL loss like a *****?
 
Advertisement
Back
Top