J - - - - - - -
- - -
Check the principled, hierarchal student suppressing (not his place, etc.), bs. Speak the truth (and that doesn't mean be dishonoring, belligerent, or "smug," disrespectful, or undermine those from whom you're supposed to learn from... Take the traditionalist glasses off, and you'll see he simply said, "we [have] to learn to..." and its unquestionably for the benefit of the team. And this 'earn the right to speak' * (your comment that he's "too trash to talk so much") is more or equally stubborn as Richt's approach (if it doesn't fit within the confines... then bye bye)... Rosier spoke up, publicly; and few things are that telling and hopefully helpful to account for what's happening within the team (outside it's easy to see the stagnant offense; but when you have someone who's been at the brunt of the dispute (more for the decision to play him, than criticizing him), and he calls out what he claims is part of the problem (without ignoring that to some extent, he may also deflecting from his play, but which would still go back to who's decision it was to play him), it can help shed light --specifically to those who are in a position to affect a change in philosophies, and eventually personnel). So, for that, we can be thankful for Rosier's comment; but beyond that, he shouldn't be criticized for speaking up on the idea that he isn't good enough to speak... On those grounds, are any of us "qualified?").
