With a straight finger, this dude just typed that a team's record has nothing to do with a coaching staff's ability to make their football players better. And he even had the nerve to toss a "but good job" condescending cherry on top of that **** sundae.Like clive, dorsett and denzel?
Yes. 6-6
The record has nothing to do with development but good job
Just nominated your post for CIS Porst of the Day on the WEZ. Enjoy your negs.
lol dude will suck just like everyone else corched by this terrible staph. **** this school
Like clive, dorsett and denzel?
Yes. 6-6
The record has nothing to do with development but good job
lol dude will suck just like everyone else corched by this terrible staph. **** this school
Like clive, dorsett and denzel?
Yes. 6-6
The record has nothing to do with development but good job
are you mentally handicapped? I don't want to make fun of someone with an actual disability.
Like clive, dorsett and denzel?
Yes. 6-6
The record has nothing to do with development but good job
are you mentally handicapped? I don't want to make fun of someone with an actual disability.
The post is pretty terrible, but let's not overlook the underlying posts saying Clive, Dorsett and Denzel suck. Also pretty ****ing awful.
Yes. 6-6
The record has nothing to do with development but good job
are you mentally handicapped? I don't want to make fun of someone with an actual disability.
The post is pretty terrible, but let's not overlook the underlying posts saying Clive, Dorsett and Denzel suck. Also pretty ****ing awful.
i admit it was horribly typed should have made my point better still learning to try to come on here when not under the influence but hey after this last season we all need to drink a little more
Like clive, dorsett and denzel?
Yes. 6-6
The record has nothing to do with development but good job
are you mentally handicapped? I don't want to make fun of someone with an actual disability.
The post is pretty terrible, but let's not overlook the underlying posts saying Clive, Dorsett and Denzel suck. Also pretty ****ing awful.
Well we are 6-6 and have those guys going in high rounds, so are they magically great players who were low rated guys or were they developed right? How many teams with sh¡tty records have kids going in the first round? Kids can be developed into good players and the coach is a crappy gameday Xs and Os coach, has denzel been better every year here, same for walford same for dorsett, the coaches had nothing at all to do with that? We have guys coached by them playing over guys that were drafted higher, guys from major programs that did better than the canes and have better resources, so are you saying those teams that have won a lot more than us cant develope kids? Because their records at the time were better
Not supporting folden at all, just saying it aint the players and their lack of development that are losing us games, its the coaches sh¡tty play calling and the scheme being run is what is costing us games
Yes. 6-6
The record has nothing to do with development but good job
are you mentally handicapped? I don't want to make fun of someone with an actual disability.
The post is pretty terrible, but let's not overlook the underlying posts saying Clive, Dorsett and Denzel suck. Also pretty ****ing awful.
I dont think they suck. Just to clear that up
No. 6-6 doesn't mean talent wasn't developed.
6-6 means our coaching, leadership, and game day coaching was sub-par and pretty much awful.
lol dude will suck just like everyone else corched by this terrible staph. **** this school
Like clive, dorsett and denzel?
Yes. 6-6
The record has nothing to do with development but good job
With a straight finger, this dude just typed that a team's record has nothing to do with a coaching staff's ability to make their football players better. And he even had the nerve to toss a "but good job" condescending cherry on top of that **** sundae.Like clive, dorsett and denzel?
Yes. 6-6
The record has nothing to do with development but good job
Just nominated your post for CIS Porst of the Day on the WEZ. Enjoy your negs.