Are you happy with 9-3?

[OrangeBowlMagic]

Because it’s been a discussion on twitter today, I wanted to see what the board thinks.

This is a complete blanket question. No context. No “well if we lose to this team but beat this team.” No Charlotte talk. No bowl talk. And yes, I COMPLETELY understand that not all 9-3’s are created equal. But for the purposes of this, they are. If Miami finishes the regular season 9-3, are you happy?

 

[paksat]

depends on who we lose to

 

[HurricaneHauk]

no

 

[Mandingo]

**** no.

 

[OrangeBowlMagic]

depends on who we lose to

I hate everyone

 

[Lokest]

Can't look at this list of teams and say I would be fine losing to 3 of them

 

[paksat]

Can't look at this list of teams and say I would be fine losing to 3 of them

View attachment 115890

ok n/m

fck no

 

[Cookie917]

define "happy"

 

[Ice79]

Happy, **** no. Able to live with it, yeah.

 

[Kylo||_||Cane]

If we lose three games during the regular season we probably don’t make the acccg so...

 

[Firesite]

Is it an improvement yes. But happy? **** NO!

 

[305to954]

Lmao 7-6 to 6-7 and we *****ing about a 9-3 year that probably puts us in the ACCCG

 

[305to954]

If we lose three games during the regular season we probably don’t make the acccg so...

Two con losses 1 non con I think would be the formula

 

[Geddy Lee]

Another rockin thread but **** no to answer your question. With this schedule, 11-1 no excuses but we said that last year as well.

 

[Poptimus]

Why would anyone be happy with 9-3 and that schedule? 10-2 is the benchmark IMO.

 

[Zbrod95]

Yeaaaaaaa


No

 

[DTP]

With no significant injuries? Nope

 

[Mandingo]

Can't look at this list of teams and say I would be fine losing to 3 of them

View attachment 115890

Freaking basketball schedule. Awful. 11 wins or bust.

 

[rok]

Yes. This isn't 1989.

 

[Gooner#44]

Absolutely yes, if you say otherwise you are homer who thinks this is still 2002.