Roll her in flour and hit the wet spot.
Correct. But if Richt had a good lawyer, he could well have had a slide scale where termination in a year or two after extension would be more painful than later, not just in terms of remaining payments but also how they are or are not discounted. James would likely have thought there was a close to zero percent chance he’d be terminating richt a year after extending him euphorically. So it could be an awful dynamic. No idea here, just can smell richt’s leverage in his blase attitude towards changes and accountability.The buyout is not more than the total payments due.
That dude is asking to be teabagged.
I do think you are off. It’s ticket sales that they report as attendance. Those big season ticket numbers get reduced slower than actual butts in seats. But, they don’t count butts in seats. If you bought a ticket to the game, it’s all good to UM.By my rough calculations, we would be losing 6-8 Million dollars a year in ticket sales alone if Mark sticks around without making any meaningful changes. I suspect that attendance would be half of what it typically would be. I'm basing this on a projected average attendance number of 30K next year. And this may be unrealistically high. Am I off here??? Why would the University not pay the buyout to get this MFer out of here?? The low attendance, the PR nightmare, the multiple years we would be set back, and the overall toxicity of the program would be far more costly than a 10 million dollar buyout. Help me out nerds
Total BS. His buyout would be worth more than his entire remaining salary (unless we are paying the guy a lot more than we think).
life is more complicated than whatever you read in law school. Boards rarely overrule a general counsel with legitimate, serious concerns. The board of a nonprofit would be less likely to do so, moreover. Not saying that happened here, just pointing out, the general counsel has more influence on the type of contract extension being discussed here than the discussion in this thread seems to acknowledge. Whether that influence was exercised in this case, i have no idea.
Sue under the Statue of Frauds!life is more complicated than whatever you read in law school. Boards rarely overrule a general counsel with legitimate, serious concerns. The board of a nonprofit would be less likely to do so, moreover. Not saying that happened here, just pointing out, the general counsel has more influence on the type of contract extension being discussed here than the discussion in this thread seems to acknowledge. Whether that influence was exercised in this case, i have no idea.
The pirate would be awesome.Let’s just say this plays out and Richt walks.
Who wants to come here? And who would we pick?
The two that would want to come:
Babers
The Pirate
Anyone else?
I'm waitin' for word from Edwin Pope or Luther Evans on this.
You can if you were born that way.I am confused... how does he fit his hand and his head up there?
So, Goldberb still alibe down there?I have Beano Cook and Hank Goldberg on separate landlines right now.
Video from the meeting:I posted this on another thread but since this is the official thread here it is. Also, I'm not claiming this guy knows anything but nobody really does it seems.
View attachment 73369
Mark Rcht is not going anywhere. Also, he is not going to hire an offensive coordinator. What he will do is give up play-calling. One of our current co-offensive coordinators will call the plays. Yeah yeah yeah, as he will say, everyone will have a say. It makes the most sense. We have Co-defensive coordinators that call plays, so we should have co-offensive Coordinators that call plays.
So, Goldberb still alibe down there?
He's after my time in south Florida. Sonny Hirsch was doing play-by-play down there when I left (and he still might be) and Luther Evans was Herald beat reporter (may still be under the nom de plume Susan Miller Degmam).
Jimmy the Greek laying the odds.I have Beano Cook and Hank Goldberg on separate landlines right now.