ANALYTICS & STATE OF THE PROGRAM : PART 1 (TALENT & BLUE CHIP AVERAGE)

Great data! This highlights our talent level. The only call out is you can't put a 99.9% probability on one of those teams based on such a small sample size. I would also call out that you need to BCAvg or rating of the defensive line of those championships teams.
 
Advertisement
Watson 2017 box score vs bama:
420 yards passing and 91 rushing. That’s a **** of a blue chip ratio.
 
In terms of pure talent body for body we're the 2nd or 3rd most talented team in the ACC (a lot of FSU's talent was high rated but also overrated).

We're also by far the most talented team in the Coastal & it's not even close.

Everything will come down to QB play, if Enos can maximize our QB play & increase offensive productivity we'll win the Coastal by a landslide.
Florida State has had the highest rated BCAvg in the ACC for the last 14 years. Most of the years they were in the top 5 Nationally to be honest. But that's only 1 (Talent) of the three tools. You still need (Development & Coaching). That will be the next segment. Does the coaching match the Talent.
 
Advertisement
In terms of pure talent body for body we're the 2nd or 3rd most talented team in the ACC (a lot of FSU's talent was high rated but also overrated).

We're also by far the most talented team in the Coastal & it's not even close.

Everything will come down to QB play, if Enos can maximize our QB play & increase offensive productivity we'll win the Coastal by a landslide.
I’ll take it a step further.

We were 97th in S&P special teams last year. We get inside top 30, we win costal walking away.

Offense doesn’t have to be great against this schedule, considering the defense we should have. Just can’t let the opposition start at midfield every possession.
 
Never argue with the data.
- Sheen
 
I see where this is going.

Martell fans are about to go nuts.

Not so fast.

Look at that list of National Champions. Except for Winston ( whose skill set was more pocket passer than dt) all the elite dual threat quarterbacks played in pure spread shotgun systems.

THAT IS NOT WHAT WE RUN!

Does Enos have the chops to implement a system akin to the spread that these great dual threat quarterbacks used? Because our offense looks way more like Bama than Osu, Auburn, or Clemson.

Look at defensive s&p for all Alabama’s national championships since 2009

2009 6.5 rank 1
2011 6.4 rank 1
2012 10.7 rank 3
2015 9.1 rank 1
2017 5.6 rank 1

Only two teams with defensive s&p outside the top 10 have won the title since 2005, Auburn(44) and Ohio State(24). Cam Newton is the DEFINITION of a transcendent player.

Miami’s defensive s&p last year was 14 at 15.8. THIS WILL NOT CUT IT and will be the real reason we can’t compete for the Natty.

Transcendent qb play is what is necessary to beat NICK SABAN. EVERY title game since 2010 has had to go through him, whether Iron Bowl, playoff, or title game.

Get the defensive s&p into the top 3 and theoretically, we can win it with any of our qbs as long as we don’t have to play a strong Bama team.

Personally, I think Saban’s ego is consuming them and the title game debacle is just the beginning of their slide. I know it sounds crazy, but I don’t think they make the playoffs.

The nose tackle play is CRITICAL for us to have a shot. We have all the other elements of a championship defense except ridiculous depth. Get great play at the 1 tech, we can take anybody on if we get some luck in the injury department.

We may be better off trying to imitate Bama than the spread teams because Martell has not been amazing in the preseason the way many of those other quarterbacks were before their championship campaigns.

Edit: Every title since 2009 has gone through Nick Saban.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
It's a new season. A new era. A NEW MIAMI. But how do we make sure that we don't repeat the shortcomings of the past? In fact, what has caused us to fall so far from grace? Has our recruiting been bad? Is it the coach's fault? Are we not developing the players right? You need THREE things to be SUCCESSFUL: TALENT, COACHING, DEVELOPMENT. Let's take an in-depth, analytical look at The U.



TALENT

"Talent" is defined in the dictionary as natural aptitude or skill. When you think of Miami, you should think of speed and skill. Playmakers. How have the Canes stacked up against the other competition?

Bud Elliott wrote an article on Blue Chip Ratio. Blue Chip Ratio is the percentage of your roster that has Blue Chip (4 & 5 Star) players. If your Blue Chip Ratio is 50% or better, you are considered a national title contender. 13 teams reached that plateau last season. Spoiler: Miami wasn't one of them. To me, this was a good starting point. But it didn't get to the of the equation. It was still too vague. So, I began to research & put in a lot of work & hours to dissect & analyze the root value of everything.

So here we go...

I created some new terms and will explain each of them as we come across them. The Blue Chip Ratio doesn't include Transfers. Talent is Talent. You cannot ignore the Transfer Portal. I included Transfers in my data. My source for the information is 24/7 Sports since they average all the other recruiting services as well.

Instead of Blue Chip Ratio, we will use Blue Chip Average (BCAvg). BCAvg is the Average of the School's Blue Chip Prospects Enrolled/Signed per Signing Year. This is the BCAvg for the upcoming 2019 College Football Season.

SCHOOL​
BCAvg​
CONFERENCE / DIVISION​
1. Alabama​
20.75​
SEC - West
2. Georgia​
18.75​
SEC - East
3. Ohio St.​
18.50​
BIG 10 - East
4. Texas​
15.25​
BIG 12
5. LSU​
14.75​
SEC - West
6. Michigan​
14.50​
BIG 10 - East
7. Oklahoma​
14.25​
BIG 12
8. USC​
13.50​
PAC 12 - South
9. Auburn​
13.25​
SEC - West
10. Florida St.​
13.00​
ACC - Atlantic
10. Penn St.​
13.00​
BIG 10 - East
12. Florida​
12.50​
SEC - East
12. Notre Dame​
12.50​
INDEPENDENT
14. Clemson​
12.00​
ACC - Atlantic
15. MIAMI
11.50
ACC - Coastal
16. Texas A&M​
10.75​
SEC - West
17. Washington​
10.25​
PAC 12 - North
18. Tennessee​
9.00​
SEC - East
19. Oregon​
8.75​
PAC 12 - North
20. Stanford​
8.00​
PAC 12 - North
21. Ole Miss​
7.25​
SEC - West
21. UCLA​
7.25​
PAC 12 - South
23. South Carolina​
6.25​
SEC - East
24. Nebraska​
6.00​
BIG 10 - West
25. Arkansas​
5.75SEC - West

So what do these ratings translate to? Is that good Miami is 11.50? Last year, Clemson was an 11.75 when they defeated Alabama (19.00). The lowest BCAvg National Champion was the 2010 Auburn Tigers at 8.25. The lowest BCAvg to make the College Football Playoff was the 2015 Michigan State Spartans at 4.25, which ranked 28th that season. The farthest back we can track the data is the 2005 season which includes the 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002 Recruiting Classes, respectfully. The 2001 Class is sketchy from a star rating perspective & mostly just names the recruits who signed & enrolled only. So it's unusable.

How have the past recruiting classes done? If the bare minimum to win the National Championship is an 8.25, how many would qualify? What was their BCAvg & Ranking?


BOLD - Teams above 8.25 BCAvg.

Let's return our focus to the upcoming 2019 Season. How does the rest of the conference stack up to the Canes?



Talent wise, Miami has the clear advantage in the Coastal Division. In fact, there hasn't been a year where they didn't. Under Richt, Golden, Shannon & Coker, Miami has been the CLEAR FAVORITE from a talent perspective. But we will get into coaching in our PART 2: COACHING segment. The 2019 Canes will be the best Roster to hit the field since 2010. Almost a full decade. So how good are Miami's chances to win it all? Is there even a chance? Let's look back at the top 25 for the upcoming 2019 season.

School​
BCAvg.​
Conference / Division​
Alabama20.75SEC - West
Georgia18.75SEC - East
Ohio St.18.50BIG 10 - East
Texas15.25BIG 12
LSU14.75SEC - West
Michigan14.50BIG 10 - East
Oklahoma14.25BIG 12
USC13.50PAC 12 - South
Auburn13.25SEC - West
Florida St.13.00ACC - Atlantic
Penn St.13.00BIG 10 - East
Florida12.50SEC - East
Notre Dame12.50INDEPENDENT
Clemson12.00ACC - Atlantic
MIAMI11.50ACC - Coastal
Texas A&M10.75SEC - West
Washington10.25PAC 12 - North
Tennessee9.00SEC - East
Oregon8.75PAC 12 - North
Stanford8.00PAC 12 - North
Ole Miss7.25SEC - West
UCLA7.25PAC 12 - South
South Carolina6.25SEC - East
Nebraska6.00BIG 10 - West
Arkansas5.75SEC - West

Let's strictly stick to the data that has been provided for us. So we know the from earlier that the 2010 Auburn Tigers were the lowest BCAvg (8.25) team to win it all. So any school BELOW 8.25 we can eliminate. Goodbye Stanford, Ole Miss, UCLA, South Carolina, Nebraska & Arkansas. So now we have 19 Schools Eligible. Let's look at the previous schools from 2005 - 2018 to win the National Title.



Hmmm...what's the most important position on the football field? QUARTERBACK. Who were the starting quarterbacks for the majority of the season for National Championship Teams and what were they rated coming out of High School?



This is probably the time some of you might be pointing out that Tua Tagovailoa came in the national championship game for Jalen Hurts in 2017 to win it. Or that Cardale Jones was the starting QB for Ohio St.'s 2014 National Championship team. You are right on both statements. But neither QB played more snaps than the original starter. That's where the data takes us, so that's where we will follow. So the LOWEST rated PRO STYLE QB is #14 (Jacob Coker) & the LOWEST rated DUAL THREAT QB is #4 Jalen Hurts. How do the three QBs battling for the starting job match up with these ratings?

QUARTERBACKSTYLEH.S. GRADUATIONOVERALL QB RANKING
Tate Martell​
DUAL #2​
2017​
#5​
N'Kosi Perry
DUAL #7
2017
#15
Jarren Williams​
PRO #5​
2018​
#18​

Only 2 Quarterbacks fit the criteria. Tate Martell & Jarren Williams. Sorry N'Kosi. How about the rest of the remaining 19 schools? Let's take a look.



Now we can eliminate LSU, Florida St., Notre Dame & Oregon. Oregon? Justin Herbert? Potential #1 QB in the 2020 NFL Draft Justin Herbert??!! Yup. Put your emotions to the side & we are following the data. So now we are down to 15 College Programs capable of winning the 2019 National Championship. Can we eliminate more teams from this list? Let's look at the previous 14 National Champions Quarterback List again.



Hmmm...wait...on the National Champion QB List, ALL the LOWEST RATED QBS played for Nick Saban.

YEARSCHOOLQUARTERBACKSTYLEH.S GRADUATIONOVERALL QB RANKING
2015​
Alabama​
Jacob Coker
PRO #14
2011​
#32​
2009​
Alabama​
Greg McElroy
PRO #13
2006​
#18​
2007​
LSU​
Matt Flynn
PRO #12
2003​
#17​
2012​
Alabama​
A.J. McCarron
PRO #7
2009​
#9​
2011​
Alabama​
A.J. McCarron
PRO #7
2009​
#9​
2017​
Alabama​
Jalen Hurts
DUAL #4
2016​
#13​

Nick Saban has 6 out of the 14 National Championships. Maybe it's not so much the QB for Saban, but his system. Then that leads to our next question. How good were the other QB's that BEAT Saban? If they didn't play Saban, how good were those other 8 Quarterbacks. Let's see.

YEARSCHOOLQUARTERBACKSTYLEH.S. GRADUATIONOVERALL QB RANKING
2018​
Clemson​
Trevor Lawrence​
PRO #1
2018​
#1​
2016​
Clemson​
Deshaun Watson​
DUAL #1
2014​
#2​
2014​
Ohio St.​
J.T. Barrett​
DUAL #2
2013​
#10​
2013​
Florida St.​
Jameis Winston​
DUAL #1
2012​
#1​
2010​
Auburn​
Cam Newton​
DUAL #2
2007​
#5​
2008​
Florida​
Tim Tebow​
DUAL #1
2006​
#3​
2006​
Florida​
Chris Leak​
PRO #2
2003​
#2​
2005​
Texas​
Vince Young​
DUAL #1
2002​
#1​

BINGO. All these 8 QBs have one thing in common. They were ELITE. They were each respectfully either the #1 or #2 PRO / DUAL in their class. They can either win with their arm or with their athleticism, but regardless these 8 are PROGRAM CHANGERS. Let's trim our list one last time.

SCHOOLQUARTERBACKSTYLEH.S. GRADUATIONOVERALL QB RANKING
Alabama​
Tua Tagovailoa​
DUAL #1​
2017​
#3​
Georgia
Jake Fromm
PRO #3
2017
#4
Ohio St.​
Justin Fields​
DUAL #1​
2018​
#2​
Texas
Sam Ehlinger
DUAL #4
2017
#8
Michigan​
Shea Patterson​
PRO #1​
2016​
#1​
Oklahoma
Jalen Hurts
DUAL #4
2016
#13
USC​
J.T. Daniels​
PRO #2​
2018​
#3​
Auburn​
Bo Nix​
DUAL #1​
2019​
#1​
Florida
Feleipe Franks
PRO #5
2016
#5
Clemson​
Trevor Lawrence​
PRO #1​
2018​
#1​
MIAMI
TATE MARTELL
JARREN WILLIAMS
DUAL #2
PRO #5
2017
2018
#5
#18
Texas A&M
Kellen Mond
DUAL #3
2017
#7
Washington​
Jacob Eason​
PRO #2​
2016​
#2​
Tennessee​
Jarrett Guarantano​
DUAL #1​
2016​
#7​

Goodbye Georgia, Texas, Oklahoma, Florida, Texas A&M & Jarren Williams. WE have a QB that fits this criteria. Here's the full and FINAL list of teams and their quarterbacks who match this data.

SCHOOLQUARTERBACKSTYLEH.S. GRADUATIONOVERALL QB RANKING
Alabama​
Tua Tagovailoa​
DUAL #1​
2017​
#3​
Ohio St.​
Justin Fields​
DUAL #1​
2018​
#2​
Michigan​
Shea Patterson​
PRO #1​
2016​
#1​
USC​
J.T. Daniels​
PRO #2​
2018​
#3​
Auburn​
Bo Nix​
DUAL #1​
2019​
#1​
Clemson​
Trevor Lawrence​
PRO #1​
2018​
#1​
MIAMI
TATE MARTELL
DUEL #2
2017
#5
Washington​
Jacob Eason​
PRO #2​
2016​
#2​
Tennessee​
Jarrett Guarantano​
DUAL #1​
2016​
#7​

So there are 9 teams that fit the 14 year data. This doesn't mean that more than one of these teams will make the College Football Playoff. As I mentioned earlier on this post, the 2015 Michigan St. Spartans made the playoffs with a 4.25 BCAvg. They MADE the playoffs, but DIDN'T WIN. This data is for potential National Champions. If a team breaks this trend and sets a new one, then we will follow it. But until then, there's a 99.9% chance that one of these 9 schools will be holding up the trophy if these QBs play the majority of the snaps for their respective programs.



So YES.........MIAMI HAS A CHANCE.



In PART 2: COACHING...We will look into:
  • What separates a Great Coach, a Good Coach & a Bad Coach
  • "With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility."
  • ENWP (Expected/Neutral Win Percentage) & other NEW Analytical terms to find every Head Coach's TRUE VALUE.
  • Dissecting the 2019 Miami Hurricane Schedule and their opponents
  • The Past: Richt, Golden, Shannon & Coker
brav to the F O. 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
 
Advertisement
I can't imagine it's as simple as breaking things down into 3 components. And since it's not, I can't fault you for picking those 3 and doing what you can with them...I imagine this is as close to correct as our frail minds can come (mine anyway). My only real argument here would be that HS rating only counts for so much and I imagine you'll touch on that when you get to development.

So yeah, good work. It's nice to see somebody have some reasoning behind what they say; passing opinions off as obvious facts gets very old very quickly.

And yes, that was a semicolon cuz I'm fancy af.
 
Great data! This highlights our talent level. The only call out is you can't put a 99.9% probability on one of those teams based on such a small sample size. I would also call out that you need to BCAvg or rating of the defensive line of those championships teams.

Agree. QB and OL/DL just seem to have far more importance than any of the other positions. I don't know if it's possible to frame it in an analytical model but I'd think a true look at how talented a team is would assign different weights to different positions when calculating BCAvg.

FSU and Clemson are a great example of why it makes such a difference
 
Advertisement
A glaring result leaps off the page for all the graduated QBs (regardless of HS ***** or collegiate accomplishment):

None of them have done anything of consequence at NFL level. None.

That would indicate these athletes' performance are more products of the systems (with help from surrounding teammates) than "elite" individual play.
 
Excellent data & analysis!

Clemson is a perfect example of how important QB is, and debunks how important OL line play is.

Here's what Clemson put up vs Alabama the last 4 years:

2015 - Deshaun Watson - 40 pts
2016 - Deshaun Watson - 35 pts
2017 - Kelly Bryant - 6 pts
2018 - Trevor Lawrence - 44 pts

Clemson hasn't had an OL drafted since their 2013 season.
 
Excellent data & analysis!

Clemson is a perfect example of how important QB is, and debunks how important OL line play is.

Here's what Clemson put up vs Alabama the last 4 years:

2015 - Deshaun Watson - 40 pts
2016 - Deshaun Watson - 35 pts
2017 - Kelly Bryant - 6 pts
2018 - Trevor Lawrence - 44 pts

Clemson hasn't had an OL drafted since their 2013 season.

This is fallacious.

Of course QB play is of primary importance. But to discount the importance of the OL is atrociously bad logic.

Especially using Clemson’s example. Just because their OLinemen didn’t project well to the next level, NFL, doesn’t mean they weren’t talented, effective, productive and cohesive COLLEGE OLinemen.

Stunningly bad conclusion about the offensive line.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top