LOL,, you quoted someone saying "Good" but failed to produce evidence of it so now you get mad and begin insulting me.
Great work.
Stick to making up lies about Pete Carroll, KlanAlmighty. The big boys are having a discussion now and the annoying gnats like you have no place. Run along and concoct some more fake statistics.
Great, so now that you agree that you made that up about others saying the defense would be "good" but for the offense, what are you arguing? CyberCane, Myself, Niner have just been saying the had the offense controlled the ball more the defense would be on the field less which will in turn shown on the stats. Glad you agree with us.
NO ONE SAID ANYTHING ABOUT IT MAKING THE DEFENSE GOOD. NO ONE
SiI seece you aren't smart enough to do this yourself:
"That extra six minutes of time the D is not on the field is probably worth 50 yards of defense and maybe 5 points.
Then you add some better talent in the front then we are used to and a good secondary, which should shave another 30-40 yards off the totals. So it's not still all hard to shed an extra 80 yards of yards yielded a game from out totals. If we are giving up 360 instead of 430 a game,
that's a good defense. FIU and geo posted about this already."
So yes, KlanAlmighty, somebody posted about increased TOP, among other things, making the defense good. Bye bye.
You really are just a terrible poster. You lie, lie, lie and then you think you are actually part of this conversation I am having with Cyber, who is actually a good poster. Like I told you, liar, run along and make up some more statistics about Pete Carroll.