I’m going from memory, but I’d agree that #9 over #4 would probably rank higher than #10 over #6. They started off ranked higher than us, and beat a higher ranked team than we did. I thought the Canes would jump to 5, with Texas and a team with a cupcake win dropping below us. But I totally get why LSU is ahead of us this week, I just don’t agree that TX and Oregon should be. So I guess I’m agreeing with you. If they jumped 5, why didn’t we?so LSU win over Clemson is worth much more than a Miami win over ND
Like is this real life? We have a top 10 win....but yeah lets put a team with 1 loss ahead of usTexas ahead of us is a Joke
And had we lost by the same score, we'd be around 30th...guarenteed.Like is this real life? We have a top 10 win....but yeah lets put a team with 1 loss ahead of us
Like is this real life? We have a top 10 win....but yeah lets put a team with 1 loss ahead of us
9 vs 4 compared to 10 vs 6. LSU won at Clemson. i think that makes sense tbh.so LSU win over Clemson is worth much more than a Miami win over ND
12 teams get in. who cares as long as youre in the top 12.Why even open with a top-10 team if the reward is to move up three f*cking spots?
i had FSU around 18-22 post Bama win so that tracks actuallyJoke. So is FSU at 19. The conference bias is absurd and it does have a cumulative effect over the course of a season.
12 teams get in. who cares as long as youre in the top 12.