- Joined
- Feb 1, 2012
- Messages
- 7,091
Cincinnati makes way too much sense. Especially with OSU being the only P5 in Ohio.
Whatever u say, time will tell but I’m pretty sure the people that matter agree with me on this one otherwise these schools would currently be in big 12..Yes, they actually do.
That's what happens when you have over 50,000 undergrads.
Besides, your comment is ignorant of what actually happens with TV contracts. Once you have an Orlando or Tampa based team, that TV market will get multiple ACC games OVER a bunch of other games, including any SEC games (with the exception, possibly, of the Gaytors).
After a couple of years in the ACC, the only thing that would ever take precedence (or compete for ratings) in the Orlando or Tampa TV markets would be the Gaytors. Everything else would fall behind ACC games.
Memphis and West Virginia make the most sense to me.
I would prefer PSU to the Independent Indiana Team. “White out” and the Hurricanes! Count me in.
I don't think you understand how horrific those two schools are academically. I know football isn't a Nobel Prize competition, but they are so bad I honestly think it might be a complete non-starter.
We are a conference that only has one school outside the top 100 (****** L'ville at #192). These schools are WAY below even that. I don't know if the presidents have any appetite for the #228 and #278 schools in US respectively.
- Duke University: 10 (tie)
- University of Notre Dame: 15 (tie)
- Wake Forest University: 27
- University of Virginia: 28
- Georgia Institute of Technology: 29 (tie)
- University of North Carolina—Chapel Hill: 29 (tie)
- Boston College: 37 (tie)
- Syracuse University: 54 (tie)
- Florida State University: 57 (tie)
- University of Miami: 57 (tie)
- University of Pittsburgh: 57 (tie)
- Clemson University: 70 (tie)
- Virginia Tech: 74 (tie)
- North Carolina State University—Raleigh: 84 (tie)
- University of Louisville: 192 (tie)
I don't think you understand how horrific those two schools are academically. I know football isn't a Nobel Prize competition, but they are so bad I honestly think it might be a complete non-starter.
We are a conference that only has one school outside the top 100 (****** L'ville at #192). These schools are WAY below even that. I don't know if the presidents have any appetite for the #228 and #278 schools in US respectively.
- Duke University: 10 (tie)
- University of Notre Dame: 15 (tie)
- Wake Forest University: 27
- University of Virginia: 28
- Georgia Institute of Technology: 29 (tie)
- University of North Carolina—Chapel Hill: 29 (tie)
- Boston College: 37 (tie)
- Syracuse University: 54 (tie)
- Florida State University: 57 (tie)
- University of Miami: 57 (tie)
- University of Pittsburgh: 57 (tie)
- Clemson University: 70 (tie)
- Virginia Tech: 74 (tie)
- North Carolina State University—Raleigh: 84 (tie)
- University of Louisville: 192 (tie)
I don't think you understand that academic rankings from US News have very little to do with academics.
EXAMPLE: Florida State and Miami are tied. That alone is so absurdly laughable it invalidates any notion of those "rankings" having any remote semblance of legitimacy.
Whatever u say, time will tell but I’m pretty sure the people that matter agree with me on this one otherwise these schools would currently be in big 12..
Said it before and I'll say it again- Baylor. The other schools mentioned aren't anywhere close to what the ACC wants in academics. UCF is not a good academic school. If it just about market share, University of Houston is a no-brainer. The real prize (in terms of marketing and money) to pair up with ND would be Penn State. They almost left for the ACC in the last realignment. I could see the ACC making another run at them.
Would love PSU to be apart of The ACC simply to have the ability to beat the chit outta them every season for ‘86.
Also, that would be a good look for the ACC football conference regarding quality.
You’re looking at this situation on paper and completely ignoring the reality of the situation. Schools like UCF/USF are not even on par with a program such as BYU when we’re talking about the value they’d bring to a conference. Can’t just simply say well orlando is a bigger market than Provo so that means UCF brings more viewers..program tradition/brand relevancy can not be ignored in all of this which is why West Virginia is awkwardly sitting in the big 12 right now and UCF, USF, Houston, Rice, SMU, Temple, UCONN, San Diego St etc are sitting in G5 conferences. Not that any of this matters but maybe you’ll make a more realistic conference expansion on your next ncaa 14 dynastyAgree with you how? Yeah, that's why they took Cincinnati and Memphis. You know less than zero on this issue.
Big 12 leadership is short-sighted, greedy, and stupid. Because Fox was so desperate to keep content, they let the Big 12 keep the same money for fewer teams/games. That won't happen a second time. If you get more money for fewer teams, it becomes mathematically impossible for UCF and USF to "increase the pie", and that whole membership presentation was a farce. UCF and USF weren't rejected for "not delivering their TV markets", that's about the dumbest thing I've ever heard.
And the Big 12 is a joke.
Litigate.And since the last round of expansion, the SEC, Big 10, and Big 12 have made it nearly impossible (financially) to leave those conferences. It's a non-starter.
Do it big or don't do it at all. However, I think it's way over "Blake the *****'s" head to put together any kind of deal with the ACC.Would love PSU to be apart of The ACC simply to have the ability to beat the chit outta them every season for ‘86.
Also, that would be a good look for the ACC football conference regarding quality.
If the ACC was more aggressive about improving the brand they’d also consider dropping Wake Forest, they literally bring nothing to the table and having 4 schools in NC is overkill, you could make a case for dropping NCST as well. I’d love to see West Virginia added but the ACC and their academic prestige bs...Got to try and work out a deal for Penn State to join the conference. Every other school lessens the ACC brand, with the exceprion of WVU. With a new ACC comish coming on Blake gotta make it happen.
Not sure what you mean by “tried that before…didn’t go so well.” Explain please, if you care to.They tried that once before... didn't go so well.
I've always heard it was to get the NYC cable companies to carry the BTN. Needed a "local" influence. So many Michigan bars in NYC, it's unreal.Sometimes the "market" argument is realllly overrated though- especially in anything NYC related. Ya think Rutgers and Maryland have really brought massive tv windfalls to the Big Ten?