- Joined
- Nov 2, 2011
- Messages
- 1,642
Richt just said in an interview with the beat reporters that "when we were dominant we had guys like Wilfork - sapp - Jerome ... They were Dudes... We need to Recruit Dudes".
Yes yes yes
JC
Yes yes yes
JC
4-3 Cover 2 doesn't always translate well against the spread teams we have nowadays....too many holes.
Base Cover 2 leaves two WR uncovered in a traditional 4 wide set (1 WR in a 3 wide set). With the safety so far off the ball, it leaves bubble screens wide open for easy 5 yards, or much more. It also opens up the field if you run smash routes with 3 deep routes. It stretches the safeties hoizontally with 3 WR on 2 deep S, but also stretches the CB vertically if they run with the deep WR, opening up a huge gap for a simple curl or out. If you run cover 2, you need to rotate into a robber coverage at the snap with single high S in the middle and another safety over the slot with outside technique and inside help with the LB.
In base 4-3, cover 3 and cover 4 usually work a little better againt spread. You can run cover 2, but you need to disguise and rotate based on WR sets.
4-3 Cover 2 doesn't always translate well against the spread teams we have nowadays....too many holes.
Base Cover 2 leaves two WR uncovered in a traditional 4 wide set (1 WR in a 3 wide set). With the safety so far off the ball, it leaves bubble screens wide open for easy 5 yards, or much more. It also opens up the field if you run smash routes with 3 deep routes. It stretches the safeties hoizontally with 3 WR on 2 deep S, but also stretches the CB vertically if they run with the deep WR, opening up a huge gap for a simple curl or out. If you run cover 2, you need to rotate into a robber coverage at the snap with single high S in the middle and another safety over the slot with outside technique and inside help with the LB.
In base 4-3, cover 3 and cover 4 usually work a little better againt spread. You can run cover 2, but you need to disguise and rotate based on WR sets.
I can only get so hard.
YES! Oh man, dunno if I can rub another one out here or not, might have to wait an hour.. gettin old here...
Richt just said on 560 that he likes the old Miami defenses 4-3 2 shell...
HE SAID THAT?
ARE YOU SURE?
Yup I heard him said he needs too see if we have beast to run it
Yea he mentioned not knowing whether or not we had the personnel for it but he would look and figure everything out..
Also mentioned he got tape from every recruit and the last 2 years of all of our games he has to go over.
Richt just said on 560 that he likes the old Miami defenses 4-3 2 shell...
HE SAID THAT?
ARE YOU SURE?
Yup I heard him said he needs too see if we have beast to run it
Yea he mentioned not knowing whether or not we had the personnel for it but he would look and figure everything out..
Also mentioned he got tape from every recruit and the last 2 years of all of our games he has to go over.
He's going to puke.
4-3 Cover 2 doesn't always translate well against the spread teams we have nowadays....too many holes.
Base Cover 2 leaves two WR uncovered in a traditional 4 wide set (1 WR in a 3 wide set). With the safety so far off the ball, it leaves bubble screens wide open for easy 5 yards, or much more. It also opens up the field if you run smash routes with 3 deep routes. It stretches the safeties hoizontally with 3 WR on 2 deep S, but also stretches the CB vertically if they run with the deep WR, opening up a huge gap for a simple curl or out. If you run cover 2, you need to rotate into a robber coverage at the snap with single high S in the middle and another safety over the slot with outside technique and inside help with the LB.
In base 4-3, cover 3 and cover 4 usually work a little better againt spread. You can run cover 2, but you need to disguise and rotate based on WR sets.
just bc it's base 4-3 cover 2 doesn't mean you stay in that regardless of match up. that's what game planning is for.
Richt just said on 560 that he likes the old Miami defenses 4-3 2 shell...
HE SAID THAT?
ARE YOU SURE?
Yup I heard him said he needs too see if we have beast to run it
Yea he mentioned not knowing whether or not we had the personnel for it but he would look and figure everything out..
Also mentioned he got tape from every recruit and the last 2 years of all of our games he has to go over.
He's going to puke.
4-3 Cover 2 doesn't always translate well against the spread teams we have nowadays....too many holes.
Base Cover 2 leaves two WR uncovered in a traditional 4 wide set (1 WR in a 3 wide set). With the safety so far off the ball, it leaves bubble screens wide open for easy 5 yards, or much more. It also opens up the field if you run smash routes with 3 deep routes. It stretches the safeties hoizontally with 3 WR on 2 deep S, but also stretches the CB vertically if they run with the deep WR, opening up a huge gap for a simple curl or out. If you run cover 2, you need to rotate into a robber coverage at the snap with single high S in the middle and another safety over the slot with outside technique and inside help with the LB.
In base 4-3, cover 3 and cover 4 usually work a little better againt spread. You can run cover 2, but you need to disguise and rotate based on WR sets.
just bc it's base 4-3 cover 2 doesn't mean you stay in that regardless of match up. that's what game planning is for.
4-3 Cover 2 doesn't always translate well against the spread teams we have nowadays....too many holes.
Base Cover 2 leaves two WR uncovered in a traditional 4 wide set (1 WR in a 3 wide set). With the safety so far off the ball, it leaves bubble screens wide open for easy 5 yards, or much more. It also opens up the field if you run smash routes with 3 deep routes. It stretches the safeties hoizontally with 3 WR on 2 deep S, but also stretches the CB vertically if they run with the deep WR, opening up a huge gap for a simple curl or out. If you run cover 2, you need to rotate into a robber coverage at the snap with single high S in the middle and another safety over the slot with outside technique and inside help with the LB.
In base 4-3, cover 3 and cover 4 usually work a little better againt spread. You can run cover 2, but you need to disguise and rotate based on WR sets.
just bc it's base 4-3 cover 2 doesn't mean you stay in that regardless of match up. that's what game planning is for.
4-3 Cover 2 doesn't always translate well against the spread teams we have nowadays....too many holes.
Base Cover 2 leaves two WR uncovered in a traditional 4 wide set (1 WR in a 3 wide set). With the safety so far off the ball, it leaves bubble screens wide open for easy 5 yards, or much more. It also opens up the field if you run smash routes with 3 deep routes. It stretches the safeties hoizontally with 3 WR on 2 deep S, but also stretches the CB vertically if they run with the deep WR, opening up a huge gap for a simple curl or out. If you run cover 2, you need to rotate into a robber coverage at the snap with single high S in the middle and another safety over the slot with outside technique and inside help with the LB.
In base 4-3, cover 3 and cover 4 usually work a little better againt spread. You can run cover 2, but you need to disguise and rotate based on WR sets.
Quarters is great for it, but the pseudo cover 2 "2-read/Blue/Sink/Palms" whatever you want to name it is awesome too. Spread teams want to spread you out and throw underneath.