Search results

Supposedly that’s what happened. I don’t know if it’s true or not.

That last blitz sack was a thing of beauty. Schemed to hide the LB who looped around and said, surprise mothrfocker

Oh oh….I just spied the ****ed-off give-up frat boy look on Lane Kiffin’s face. This game is over.

I raise you…

….and falling down drunk

His eyes are literally red on the sidelines probably from crying. And I don’t blame him, I don’t mean that as a slight. Can someone explain to me why he was run so much not just in the Tennessee game but this game. He’s fūcking 185 pounds soaking wet. I believe he had already had seven rushes...

Double digit rushing attempts is not that unusual like maybe around 10 for even “non- running“ quarterbacks. Sometimes what are sacks are listed as rushing attempts. But that Tennessee game was insane.

I have to look at the stats, but did they run Corral this much during the season other than that Tennessee game?

He’s going to die on that hill. One of the dumbest football comments I’ve ever heard, “well they’re gonna make first downs anyway so let’s just quit”. Who thinks like that?

You have your answer in your question dummy. You don’t know if Ohio State is going to make a first down or not, or maybe you could just hike up your knickers like you want and give up. Had they used the timeouts they would be more than nine seconds left. There’s no question. Instead they left...

Yeah I guess apparently it’s OK to just give up and let them run the clock all the way down to 9 seconds instead of calling timeouts.

WRONG

I mean I’m hoping there’s a reason, I was really ****ed off I wanted Utah to win as much as I hate Ohio State, with all the big plays in this game who says if you don’t have three plays to call you might not get to at least FG range. It’s better than hoping for a Duke runback miracle touchdown...

You can hope for a missed field goal with more time left on the clock. He would’ve had more time left on the clock had he used the time outs. I don’t even understand your response.

Even then, they had nine seconds when Ohio State kicked off, if they had used even just two of their timeouts that would’ve added at least another 10 to 15 seconds that’s 2 to 3 plays. They actually would’ve probably had more time than that. As great a job as Whittingham has done, I have to...

Or at least use your fūcking timeouts. So when you get the ball back you can run two or three plays. Game management 101.

That was straight up dumb. I’m still scratching my head trying to figure out why they did that.

Can someone please tell me why Whittingham didn’t use his three timeouts when it was obvious that Ohio State was within field-goal range? Utah would’ve had more than nine seconds to try to pull off some kind of a miracle, they might’ve even been able to get off a couple or three plays...

He left three timeouts on the table. One of the all-time dumb moves I’ve seen in a bowl game

After having read the rest of your post I agree with what you’re saying. I can say that the Utah losses are on Mario, and also think he’s the right guy for us, right now. We absolutely have to get over the hump talent wise, even with whatever deficits Mario might have, I think he is probably...