Search results

Is that rule in the NCAA? I thought it was only for the nfl.

Well I’ve been busy catching up and just saw. I want to believe but I think we screwed this up.

I disagree with that but to each their own. I think we should bring in one of either Diaz/Mario, butch, and then two from the rest. Either Campbell or brown or other names that have been mentioned. I don’t want Diaz personally but I would interview 4-5 candidates and then bring in 2 for a second...

I don’t think every coach with a losing record will be the next bill. I just don’t think you can eliminate anyone based upon their record without looking at each situation. Going 29-25 at Miami is different than going 29-25 in Ames for example. Personally, I want someone who wants to be here...

Oh now I get it, the last time we hired a coach with a losing record was al Golden. This means any coach in the future will be a failure if they have a losing record even though they have no ******* ties to al Golden. It’s a good thing the patriots didn’t take that approach 🤦🏼‍♀️

Are you caught up on the losing record part? 4 games over 500 at Oklahoma state vs a complete rebuild ar FIU needs to be taken into account when looking at this. And as for losing records, some guy in New England had a losing record with the browns when the patriots hired him...how did that...

I was thinking - “the high for today is roughly 50 degrees warmer in Miami than Ames...do I really need to say anything else?”

Jimmy Johnson was 29-25-3 at okie state before we hired him. I’m not saying Mario is the answer but there is more to it than just looking at win/loss records.

I’ve been in Ames each of the past three days and will be there the next two. I don’t have a plane but would be happy to pull a trailer with your meaaage lol