Upon Further Review: Corey Hetherman

Lance Roffers
Lance Roffers
21 min read

Comments (120)

Let me know if you have any feedback on these. This was a fun one.
Thank you so much for your breakdown and analysis. I watched all of minnesota's games after Hetherman in excitement and noticed the heavy usage of 3 down fronts. I've been intrigued with the scheme and what Hetherman will carry over because of these quotes from Mario over the summer in various interviews and would love your opinion.

Josh Pate: "We recruited this team to be a four-down, aggressive defense. Okay, and in coach Hetherman, you know..." (goes on to compare him to Schiano).

1010XL Jacksonville's Sports Radio: "I didn't do a good enough job helping our defensive coordinator and that systematically didn't fit what we are. We're built to be a four down team, to be aggressive and up the field, and that's what we've been that's what we went to in the hire of Corey Hetherman."

Greg McElroy: "Coach Heatherman's defense really fits what we have recruited here at the University of Miami. We we were built, we recruited to be built as a four down operation. Guys that could really get up field be disruptive and you know last year we kind of we morphed into an operation that was unrecognizable."

Do you think it's simply a matter of semantics as the Jack is essentially that 4th down lineman? It's interesting to hear Mario's emphasis on a four-down system during the offseason, having already hired Hetherman.
 
Thank you so much for your breakdown and analysis. I watched all of minnesota's games after Hetherman in excitement and noticed the heavy usage of 3 down fronts. I've been intrigued with the scheme and what Hetherman will carry over because of these quotes from Mario over the summer in various interviews and would love your opinion.

Josh Pate: "We recruited this team to be a four-down, aggressive defense. Okay, and in coach Hetherman, you know..." (goes on to compare him to Schiano).

1010XL Jacksonville's Sports Radio: "I didn't do a good enough job helping our defensive coordinator and that systematically didn't fit what we are. We're built to be a four down team, to be aggressive and up the field, and that's what we've been that's what we went to in the hire of Corey Hetherman."

Greg McElroy: "Coach Heatherman's defense really fits what we have recruited here at the University of Miami. We we were built, we recruited to be built as a four down operation. Guys that could really get up field be disruptive and you know last year we kind of we morphed into an operation that was unrecognizable."

Do you think it's simply a matter of semantics as the Jack is essentially that 4th down lineman? It's interesting to hear Mario's emphasis on a four-down system during the offseason, having already hired Hetherman.
Good question.

Yes, I absolutely believe Mario is calling it a four-down system when it's really three-down with a Jack. It's a four-man front on the majority of plays, but I rarely saw four-down.

If you wanted to call Hetherman a 4-2-5 because of the Jack, I think it could be considered ok to say.

The real point is that they are odd SPACING for the most part. Whether the fourth guy is standing up or down only slightly changes the technique.
 
Who plays where?

4i- Bain, Mesidor, Blount, Lowe, Scott if we need to get heavy
Jack- Bryant, Lightfoot, Picket, McConathy, some Lowe/Bain
DT- Scott, Blay, Moten, Jones

Is a creeper normally a LB or does he bring in someone like Pickett, Washington (out this year)...
 
Who plays where?

4i- Bain, Mesidor, Blount, Lowe, Scott if we need to get heavy
Jack- Bryant, Lightfoot, Picket, McConathy, some Lowe/Bain
DT- Scott, Blay, Moten, Jones

Is a creeper normally a LB or does he bring in someone like Pickett, Washington (out this year)...
Normally an ILB, S, Nickel who folds into a gap.

Most often it's the S opposite the RB who inserts as a Creeper.
 
Vs. USC (Offense Overview)

USC runs an Air-Raid scheme that gets modified to the QB strengths.
  • Heavy Guard-Tackle counter run game
  • Dart is another staple for a tendency breaker
  • Air-Raid principles are constantly seeing additions/modifications
  • 11-personnel is base, but lots of empty (10-personnel)
  • Will also go to 12-personnel in what Riley calls “Bison” which is really just Six OL as an extra TE
  • This is a “NASCAR” team with condensed splits
  • Goal with the splits is to create space to run their screen game
  • Similar QB run element as Illinois and look to get Glance/RPO game/Bubble screens
  • Mesh/Shallow Cross/Y-Cross/Four-Verts are the typical Air-Raid staples that throw in counters like Stick-Nod
  • Tempo is extreme after explosive plays
  • Riley says “We are fast until we’re not”
  • Mesh/Wheel against Man-Free (Cover-1)
  • Orbit Motion screens are a staple against Tite fronts to force Nickel/ILB to run and cover against Branch
  • Riley wants to match your size with running in space or your smaller cover guys to make them take on blocks and tackle
Riley scripted plays at the start of the game to exploit a 4i alignment from the ends and force the ILB/Nickel to go wide and run with Jet Sweeps and OZ runs. In the pass game, outside of the screens, Riley used Smash routes vs. Quarters to stress the weak-side Safety who likes to roll into Creepers (as we’ve written repeatedly in this article). Hetherman countered after the first quarter and really got the better of Riley in this one.

Comes out in empty. Minnesota has their front wider with the ILB mugged into the B-gap.
View attachment 327856

Hetherman knows that USC tends to use their screen game out of 10 and flips the ILB from mugging the B to outside the Edge and extending their reach to outside the C. I won’t pretend to know their rules or their “call” on this play and they may have just tried to balance leverage without the threat of a run. ILB immediately jumps the Glance to the #1 WR. Throw goes to the 2 on the field side (passing strength) for a gain of five.


3rd down, send the nickel, drop the Edge into the Slant/Glance passing strength side. What you’re trying to do is break their pass protection rules and get the RT to block no one and have 4-on-3 to the left side of the line with a RB having to make a decision in pass protection.
View attachment 327858

USC’s QB feels it and rolls to his right. Edge is out in space covering grass and the outside WR has room from the CB who was in off coverage. Great play call and design, as you see that RT they had hoped would block no one, ends up blocking their blitzing nickel.
View attachment 327859

This play right here is designed to punish Bear or Tite fronts because of the angles available in the G/T counter. T can down block and then get to ILB (remember, Hetherman thrives on keeping ILB’s clean). The wrapper (G) can kick out the Jack with the Y-TE getting to the backside LB.
View attachment 327860

In order to squeeze the B’s against the run, Minnesota has their ILB’s stacked in the hashes. The extreme space of USC’s alignment creates a long way for a defender to have to go to get to the bubbles.
View attachment 327861

man pressures, Creepers, Tite fronts. What that also means is you better be physical on the outside if you want to play. DB’s are not just force players, they are also in the fits. This is their nickel throwing a WR to the ground who has 50 pounds on him. Look at him control the wrist of the blocker and get into his chest! Do these guys sit in on the DL meetings? Outside CB comes up and sticks him (though he does get the 1st). Two DB’s had to completely go 1-on-1 and win their matchups outside without any front-7 player support.
View attachment 327862

Pin-and-Pull is another play design you’ll see against Hetherman’s defense this year. With the 4i alignment of a DE, and a focus on sealing and covering that B-gap, it’s pretty easy to pin a defender inside (not to be confused with the NT wanting to pin the A-gap by getting across the face of the C in a 0-technique). The Creeper is going to get taken by the nub TE on the end.
View attachment 327863

USC runs Split with a Slicer into the mid-line to get the ILB (have to keep the ILB clean in this defense). Riley script dicing up Hetherman.
View attachment 327864

DB’s have to take the bubble with authority. Ethan Robinson (signed with Phins as a UDFA if any Phins fans reading) has been very physical in this one. He blasts Branch here, but again you see the space that a front-7 would have to go against this spacing.
View attachment 327865

Your Edge is covering a lot of grass against this script (he’s trying to take the front-side Glance, which is a staple of this offense on RPO’s). Creeper inserts to be the 4th pressure man. Branch on your backside ILB on the Glance is a great matchup for the offense. Branch drops another one or it’s a big conversion (safeties split, might walk in). USC loves to run the wheel in these spots so Hetherman has his boundary CB flat-footed watching that Wheel with a S over the top.
View attachment 327866

Doink. I know USC fans didn’t like Miller Moss, but he’s good and he will be a problem at Louisville. USC’s receiving core really didn’t play that well when I evaluated them (Branch was a possible Miami target so I watched him). USC misses the FG. Better to be lucky than good.
View attachment 327867

This is yet another example of what I mean when I say Minnesota NT wants to get across the face of the C. He wants to split that G/C and create a vertical pin where the runner is going to bounce it into the pressure. You bring your Nickel and insert him into the fit as the C-gap defender. Your Edge ducks inside to stuff the B. It’s a beautifully simple concept that lures the offense into running the ball directly into the leverage of the defense.
View attachment 327868

This is perfectly executed. NT gets across the face, Edge cuts into B and controls, Nickel plays contain and the C-gap. TFL.
View attachment 327869

This is an example of your Edge playing this horribly. He loops way too far inside when he should’ve been more vertical on the hash and then squeezing this run. Gets washed inside. Backside S, who isn’t even in the screen, runs in and makes a tackle or this might’ve gone for a TD (he was the last defender with a chance before it got into a foot race). Great play, but he got hurt on it. If you play USC how many practice reps do you have to take against G/T pullers and Pin/Pull?
View attachment 327870

Minnesota has been getting beaten up with the G/T or Pin/Pull counters in the run game (this is pretty standard play-calling against odd spacing). I talked earlier about how it’s difficult to evaluate a DC because to get hired they had to have been doing something correct. The mark of what decides their success will be in adjustments. Here’s an adjustment that Hetherman makes. The Jack is no longer lined up on the Edge. Instead, he kicks his Edges out from 4i’s out to 5-techs on both sides. He plants the Jack into the B-gap opposite the RB. Both ILB’s are kicked out further towards the RB. This gives the illusion that the B-gap opposite the Jack is open. Because the ILB’s are aligned to the RB, the Edge can crash into the B-gap, giving the defense two defenders on the wrapper in the event of a run.
View attachment 327871

The coverage behind it is a Tampa-2 using the S rather than Mike as a pole-runner (think of a defender running down MOF into the pole if he kept running). Because the Edge crashes, it is a “Pull” sign for the QB in the RPO and he tries to throw the Smash route. Backside S crashes down and knocks it away. Non-Traditional-Tampa’s are kind of en vogue in defenses right now and it’s cool to see Hetherman use it against an offense that was gashing them early.
View attachment 327872

Your nickel had better be able to pass rush to play in this defense. One of the movable pieces of a Hetherman defense. Your Nickel and your Jack better be physical players who can run, strike, play with violence, and rush the passer. Poor LT nearly falls on his face here trying to block him.
View attachment 327873

To get the TD USC goes to another of their staple plays in the Red Zone. Out of a Bunch, they run Mesh-Wheel. This concept looks to beat cover-1 (man with single-high) as it will create a natural rub against man coverage. Mesh creates confusion, TD. S tried to cut (Rob) the Mesh.
View attachment 327874

I obviously don’t know the call on this play, but with it being Cover-1, I would think #19 needs to sink normally. My guess is they had a cut call on that tries to Rob the Mesh route based on a tendency or instinct. On first watch, I thought #45 was supposed to sink, but he is supposed to carry that Mesh in Man. It’s the S, #19 that is in conflict here and doesn’t help on Post.
View attachment 327875

Here’s a good look at the Minnesota cover-3. Use the RB horizontal to stretch the Nickel and open the window for the Glance route.
View attachment 327876

We fast forward into the 4th quarter. USC has been shredding Minnesota on the ground. IZ/Counter runs have been keeping USC ahead of the chains and grinding this game along. Hetherman has moved to 5-Tech slide rather than holding a 4i front. He starts folding in the Nickel against OZ and changing the gap for the blockers and it really shuts the ground game down for USC.
View attachment 327878

See how that Nickel “folds” into the B-gap while the Edge kicks out to the C. Now the defense has an extra defender in the fit and they can pursue that IZ/Counter run game. Oklahoma has gotten to the ILB in this game and that has really caused issues and this was a Hetherman adjustment that really paid off. (Ignore the hands-to-the-face penalty on #8 which gave them a 1st down)
View attachment 327879

I made some snarky comments about covering grass, but this is why defensive coaches will drop their Jack or Edge into coverage (other than combating that quick RPO game). Defender gets the arm, ball falls right into #9’s arms for a pick.
View attachment 327880

Cover-1 man behind it and USC wanted a Slot-Fade against single-high deep. It wasn’t really there, but it illustrates all that they ask of their slot CB in this defense. But your safeties also have to rush the passer, insert into the run fit, but also run the halves in deep coverage.
View attachment 327881

One final adjustment I want to call out from Hetherman in this game. That G/T (or T/H-Sniffer) counter had really crushed Minnesota. So Hetherman started “Long-Sticking” his front. That Edge is now going to jump at least one gap and sometimes two gaps whenever he sees that T start to pull. The NT will crash into the B-gap (rather than trying to pin it vertically in the A-gap). Basically, that Edge is trying to “Chase” that T and meet in the gap to add a defender and take either the wrapper or the puller if he can get there first. The goal is to remove one of the blockers so that the runner doesn’t have two blockers in front.
View attachment 327882

Once Hetherman switched to a Long-Stick call on any time they saw a Puller, USC went from averaging 6.7 yards per carry on the counter to holding them to 14 yards on the last six carries in G/T Counter.

By the Numbers:

PFF defines a blitz as any pass play on which the defense sends one more rusher than the formation already tells the offense to expect. I.E. 4-man front and only the four DL in the front rush the passer, it’s not a blitz. If any other defenders rush the passer (even if one of the DL drop or doesn’t rush and the rush remains as four rushing the passer) it is charted as a blitz.

Note: Data is courtesy of PFF charting
  • Minnesota sent a blitz on 44.0% of pass plays, which ranked 9th among P4 schools (P4 average was 36.0%)
  • Last year, Miami blitzed 36.8%, which was 31st among P4 schools
  • DL stunts were sent on 22.5% of pass plays, which ranked 55th among 70 P4 schools (P4 average was 28.1%)
  • Miami sent a stunt on 39.3% of pass plays, which was 7th among P4 schools
  • Sim pressure was used on 17.0% of snaps, 31st in P4 (P4 average was 17.3%)
  • Miami used sim pressure on 9.7%, 47th in P4
  • Run blitzes were used by Hetherman on 28.5% of run snaps, 28th in P4 (P4 average was 26.5%)
  • Guidry ran them only 11.8% of the time, 69th out of 70 teams
  • Run stunts were ran on 7.6% of run plays, 51st in P4 (average of 11.6%)
  • Miami once again liked to run stunts at 20.3%, 5th in P4
Coverage data I have adjusted to account for the “technique” the coverage is running, rather than using pure PFF data. PFF charts only true 4-deep, 2-under static C4 as “Quarters.” Any match variant that spins to a single-high picture gets bucketed as C3 or C1. Since Hetherman likes to run “Stubby” or “Poach” vs. Trips, 3-Buzz or 3-Seam Creepers, or cover-0 drop 4 deep and all of these coverages finish as Middle-of-Field-Closed (MOFC), PFF charts them as either C3 or C1. That’s not a true picture of what Hetherman does, where he builds off of press-quarters rules that rotate late. When the weak safety buzzes down (such as 3-Buzz Robber), PFF logs it as C3 even though the CB’s are still playing MEG or MOD Quarters technique.
  • 2x2 looks: Start in a two-high shell; if the QB is under center or the back is opposite the nickel, they stayed in true Quarters
  • 3x1 or motion into trips: Hetherman would call Stubby (Quarters rules to trips) or Poach (solo on the X, 3-match away). Post-snap it lands in a one-high picture which would get logged into C3, even though it’s match Quarters rules
  • Creeper & Sim Pressures: Weak ILB or Nickel insert leads to Safety spins. Once again, that gets charted as C3/ C1, but the CBs and safeties are still using Quarters footwork until the rotation triggers
With all of that leadup taken care of:
  • Minnesota ran Quarters coverage 44.0%, 5th in P4 (P4 average 21.6%)
  • Miami ran Quarters on 21.5% of snaps, 35th in P4
  • C3 came in at 22.0%, which ranked 55th (P4 average 28.6%)
  • Miami checked in at 10.6%, 67th of 70 P4 schools
  • Minnesota ran C1 on 19.0% of coverage snaps, 43rd in P4 (Average 22.4%)
  • Guidry liked C1 and ran it 41.5%, good for 5th in P4
  • C2 shells came in at 10.5%, which was 22nd in P4 (Average 9.5%)
  • Miami was at 2.9%, 66th of 70
  • Overall, Hetherman ran Zone 64.4% (39th), and Man at 28.8% (35th)
  • Miami was Zone 49.0% (66th), and Man 47.4% (5th)
Sacks, throwaways, unclear coverage are why the totals do not go to 100% on Zone/Man percentages.
View attachment 327883

  • Quarters-match (2-Read, MOD, Stubby, Poach, 3-Buzz, 3-Seam) 44% of snaps
    • About 19 % stayed ****; the other 25 % spun late to MOFC but corners/safeties were still executing Quarters rules
  • Pure Cover 3 (bail/zone-drop, no match) 13% of snaps
    • Mostly early-down base vs. heavier personnel or long-yardage prevent
  • Cover 1 / 1-Robber (true man-free) 19% of snaps
    • Includes six-man and creeper pressures that finished in straight man
  • Cover 2 / Trap-2 (Cloud/Palms) 11% of snaps
    • Corner squat/Cloud, plus Palms vs. 2x2 RPO looks
  • Cover 6 (¼-¼-½ that stayed split-field) 2% of snaps
    • Only the snaps that didn’t spin the boundary safety to the middle
  • Cover 0 (zero blitz) 2% of snaps
    • Mostly red-zone and 3rd-and-short pressures
  • Bracket, zero-rob, prevent 8% of snaps
    • The handful of exotic third-down calls and end-of-half prevent
Overall:

If you’re like many and just skipped down to the recap or the overall, here is a Too Long, Didn't Read summary.

The NT position:
  • Vs. Zone, Hetherman runs a defense with many of the same principles of what you’d see from Georgia up front. The big exception to what Georgia runs is in their Tite fronts they often ask the NT to “two-gap” which is occupying both sides of the C/G in the A-gaps. Often times, Georgia wants that NT to “drop anchor” and shed once a runner declares their gap direction. With Minnesota, they run a similar base Tite/Mint front as Georgia, but the nose is almost always a lag-one-gap player who crosses the center’s face and “pins” the zone track, not a true two-gap anchor. He can be asked to two-gap in short-yardage or Bear/Cinco calls, but that’s the exception, not the rule. The lag nose is a hallmark of modern odd-spacing defenses (Tite, Mint, Peso, Penny). Instead of two-gapping, the nose steps with the center, rips across, and tries to be the first man vertical into whichever A-gap the center vacates. That vertical penetration is what you’re seeing on film when the runner is “pinned” back inside to the run leverage.
  • Vs. Gap schemes (e.g., Counter), same 0-tech, but may work play-side A on a call like “Push”. Cross-face creates interior traffic for pullers and then the WILB folds behind.
  • Short-yardage / Bear the NT is a true two-gap. Absorb the double, keep both A-gaps clean for downhill backers.
  • Creeper / Sim-pressure checks the NT often lag to the opposite A so the blitzer can insert play-side. This replaces a fit when a Jack or DL drops.
The Nickel position:
  • In most calls the Nickel is treated as a box-plus overhang: run game first (set or fold the C-gap), then match the slot in Quarters / rotate to flat in Cloud, and he’s the “bonus” fourth rusher on creeper pressures.
  • Generally, this player is a 6’, 215lb. type who is able to fill gaps in the run game first but also survive as a man-match defender on slots until pressure can get home.
  • Match-up sub: versus 10-personnel spread teams Hetherman will sub in a CB-style nickel so they can play more MOD/MEG man and mirror quick screens.
  • “Peso” / Dime looks: 3rd-and-long the nickel may move into the box as a dime-backer and add a true corner at the slot, giving six DBs while keeping creeper rules intact.
  • Heavy sets: Rather than using a SAM LB, the big nickel stays on the field and slides to 9-tech because the 0-4i-4i front already compresses the interior gaps.
Hetherman’s defense is built on an odd-spaced 0-4i-4i “Tite” front that closes both B-gaps pre-snap, anchoring the run with a lag nose while freeing inside linebackers to scrape clean. From that base he unleashes a library of creeper and simulated pressures—four-man rushes that exchange a dropping end for an inserting linebacker or nickel—so the offense sees blitz looks without losing coverage numbers. Coverage pairs press Quarters and Cover 1-Robber as the default shell, with occasional rotations into Cloud/Trap-2, Poach and Cover 6 to erase RPO glance routes and smash concepts. The edges tend to play a “surf” technique against option looks, while quick checks like 5-tech slide, nickel fold, and interior long-stick stunts set the perimeter and disrupt gap-scheme pulls (think of UNC running all over Miami a few years back). Because the same personnel can morph into Bear, Penny, or four-down fronts without substituting, the QB must decipher a constantly shifting picture. This hesitation allows the defense to generate negative plays and red-zone stops mostly without ever committing more than five rushers.

It's the ability to prove he has answers for changes by the offense and to the college landscape that has me believing that this guy won't suffer the same fate that Guidry faced. Guidry had success previously, but truly showed he ran out of answers once offenses adjusted to his scheme. Hetherman has already adjusted and shown his own style as he has morphed what Rutgers did and what Georgia does into his own style.

Originally, Miami was interested in Rutgers' DC Joe Harasymiak (who took the UMass job before Hetherman was hired. When Harasymiak advised his plans were to pursue a HC job, he mentioned Hetherman. At Rutgers, they played a "Tilt" front rather than a "Tite" front. The Tilt is just what it sounds like, where the NT is tilted against the C. Hetherman prefers the head-up style that Georgia uses in their Tite front (though they ask them to do different things as I mentioned above).

I’ll write up a Part Two which will focus on our personnel and where they’ll fit within the above system, roles, rules etc. but I figure this is already long enough as it is to split it up some. Thanks for reading if you made it this far.
1. WHY ARE YOU NOT ON SOMEONE'S STAFF!!!!??

2. Does Miami have on the roster the right ILB for Heatherman to utilize?
 
Good question.

Yes, I absolutely believe Mario is calling it a four-down system when it's really three-down with a Jack. It's a four-man front on the majority of plays, but I rarely saw four-down.

If you wanted to call Hetherman a 4-2-5 because of the Jack, I think it could be considered ok to say.

The real point is that they are odd SPACING for the most part. Whether the fourth guy is standing up or down only slightly changes the technique.
And hence how he tries to create overloads against OLs...
 
Wow. Can someone draw me a picture - using Kindergarten fat crayons - of what Lance said? I mean wow; I know a thing or two about football but this write up serves as a slap aross the face that I do not know terminology worth a mierda, specifically modern terminlogy.

The time and effort that went into this is way beyond next level. Thank you @Lance Roffers
 
Summer is upon us and leaves some time for a visit to the lab and a review of the new coaches at Miami for the 2025 season. The most prominent change Miami saw in their coaching staff was the removal of Lance Guidry as DC, replaced by an up-and-comer in the coaching world, former Minnesota DC Corey Hetherman.

Disclaimer: This article will be wordy, with lots of technical dialogue and more in-depth analysis than I would typically include into one of these. If that’s not your thing, this will not be for you. If it is, sit back, grab a drink, follow along as we dive deeper into Corey Hetherman’s defense, only at Upon Further Review.

What went wrong?
Before diving into Minnesota defense, I want to look back at the failed Guidry era and try to understand where it went wrong. On film, the Guidry defense from Marshall was strong. It brought many different exciting elements including an aggressive 1-gap style, physical man-coverage on the outside, talent development stories, sum of its parts results etc. He earned a stamp of approval from me when I reviewed his past and thought Miami had found a strong new coach.

Where things went wrong are difficult for me to say definitively, but ultimately what it comes down to is I believe that Guidry failed to evolve. Once offenses adapted to the current defensive landscape and found ways to exploit holes in the Miami defense, Guidry was powerless to find answers. Simple motion caused communication issues constantly. Gap movement (adding a gap, moving the bubble etc.) looked like Mandarin to Miami defenders. Tom Herman once famously called Kirby Smart’s defenses the “Palms Up” defense because his pace/tempo had the defenders with their palms up asking what the call was as the ball was being snapped. That’s what defense looked like for Miami last year on most snaps, only Guidry never had the answers on what the call should be.

Calling a great defensive game is often about breaking tendencies, knowing when to call your counters, and when to call pressure. When to set traps, lay bait, or push coverage to the correct areas. All of those things seemed to be off last year after a few injuries happened. Pressure mounted, personalities clashed, and Guidry retreated into a shell defense hoping against hope that the offense would make a mistake so they could get off-the-field. No matter what contributed- be it personnel, injury, talent, or other- Guidry simply could not return after he showed himself incapable of teaching his defense in a way defenders could understand and overcome personnel issues.

Corey Hetherman Defense:

Minnesota last year ran a hybrid defense with multiple fronts, coverages, and pressure packages. Hetherman looked to get his LB’s and DB’s involved in pressure and changed the post-snap picture on the offense often.

Hetherman accomplished all of this by using an odd front that allowed for flexibility to switch spacing, pressure packages, and maintain balance to both sides of the defense (passing strength and run strength). Nick Saban was famous for his defenses finding a way to always maintain numbers to both sides of the field and keep leverage (Saban was the GOAT in teaching outside leverage to his DB’s for maintaining proper leverage and inserting numbers to keep contain).

Minnesota Film:

Vs. Illinois (Offense Overview)


Illinois runs a Pro-Spread they like to call a “Tempro” attack.
  • They run a shotgun based, 11 personnel offense that is multiple in formation packaging
  • Inside-Zone is their bread-and-butter run concept (like most Spread teams)
  • Split-Zone with a slicer TE (usually from a Sniffer alignment) and attach a Glance, Stick, or Bubble as the RPO
  • G/T counter like you’d see from Lincoln Riley is probably their favorite gap concept
  • Use offset H-back as a FB out of Diamond to get numbers for Altmyer to run
  • 3 x 1 Gun looks with Pat Bryant to boundary and get him matched up advantageously
  • Low zone or LOS screens game, especially with Counters or Misdirection
  • Tempo is mainly run on 1st/2nd down and they like to run tempo when they have a formation advantage. When they go “heavy” they tend to slow it down
  • Illinois runs a really cool offense that is difficult to prepare for (I didn’t know it fully before going into this exercise. Their OC is pretty good.)
I won’t walk through every single element for all of the plays but wanted to establish a Baseline of what I am seeing and why it is happening. As we get further along, you (the reader) can identify the reasons already from early explanations.

Minnesota comes out in a 3-4 front with a 4i (covers B-gap) to the passing strength and a 7-tech (covers C-gap between nub TE and LT) to the rushing strength. Passing strength is where more receivers are and rushing strength is where more blockers or larger bodies are (typically side the TE lines up). They also have a Flex Jack LB standing up on the LOS as a 9-tech. A variation of Hetherman’s Base Tite or Mint front.

Coverage wise you see the CB eye-to-eye with the WR aligned square to him. This generally signifies man pre-snap. To the field side, you see the S and CB communicating the coverage. Pre-snap, it is a typical stack with the LB over Slot and the S stacked over the top. The S’s appear to be in cover-2 with Middle of Field Open (MFO).
View attachment 327808

But you see why when he was at James Madison his players were quoted as saying, “super-aggressive, disguise-everything defense” post-snap as the coverage morphs into a different look. Pat Bryant (drafted 3rd round by Broncos goes in motion, the S is already blitzing and to the side he vacated, the ILB that was over Bryant shifts inside.
View attachment 327809

At the snap, Minnesota is slanting and squeezing everything away from the pressure and towards the motion (to keep numbers). The S now replaces the Jack as the Contain player. This inserts the S as a Creeper, while also becoming the COP (Contain Outside Player, but ALSO responsible for the QB). #92 turns his shoulders and runs the heels on the LOS to force the QB to have a keep call on the Zone-Read.
View attachment 327811

You’ll notice that Bryant has flipped his motion to come back counter to initial motion and is now running along the with the mesh on Read and is the third option on this play for a pass. I spoke about the coverage picture changing post-snap and you will see that Minnesota is actually running cover-1 man (MOC), rather than the cover-2 look they gave pre-snap. You’ve also used Odd-spacing to keep your Mike free on this play in run support.

The Creeper S takes his COP role too seriously and let’s Bryant run by him here rather than covering him and forcing QB to run. #4 gets the block on #5 and Bryant has an explosive run down the LOS. It was a great play call by Illinois, as they have the numbers outside even if the S covers Bryant and the QB can pull and run (though it’s probably not as big of a gain).
View attachment 327812

Next play they start in a similar alignment, but the NT is shaded rather than head-up. Spread teams are looking to expose that B-gap with space and you can see the B-gap looks open pre-snap. Passing strength to the field so your edge is aligned in a 5-technique and will probably employ a Roscoe technique (Rush Outside and Contain).
View attachment 327813

Hetherman likes to blitz his nickel from the side opposite of the RB. He can drop that low-safety into the coverage to replace the pressure, keep numbers to both halves of the field, and bring 5-man pressures. I want you to pay attention to another element that the Hetherman defense likes to accomplish; that NT is looking to get across the face of the C and “Pin” the run into pressure. That NT is trying to explode through that gap and not just occupy the C, Pin the A-gap (forcing a RB to bounce), but he is also looking to prevent that pulling T from getting out to the Mike. Illinois is running G/T Counter (A staple run play for Spread Option teams to insert Gap runs into their base offense, this is perhaps THE run play that Lincoln Riley likes to run, especially with a mobile QB). #91 gives a subtle grab of that T’s arm as he tries to get through. Edge to Pass Strength is, in fact, playing Roscoe which forces that G to arc around to get to the pressure.
View attachment 327815

The picture of coverage has once again changed post-snap. Middle defender now has feet planted, eyes on QB, while the defense drops into Cover-3. NT keeps Mike free (an absolute feature of Hetherman’s defense is his ability to keep Mike free) and the defense has pushed everything to that B-gap with a free Mike. TFL.
View attachment 327816

Defense gets to 3rd down, which is where DC’s make their name and their money. Minnesota is running a 5-1 (five-man front, one LB, five DB’s) “Penny” front (I’ve also seen it called Poker).
View attachment 327819

At the snap they run an E/T stunt with coverage having “Eyes-On” QB in Zone. It’s hard to know without the call, but I Minnesota is driving on anything underneath, with the outside CB being responsible for stopping anything outside. CB who is squatting on the hash is “reading” receivers and passing the inside and taking the Seam or anything breaking outside intermediate. The result is a difficult long throw outside the hash for the QB and a punt.
View attachment 327820

Out of a Tite Front, the defense “pushes” everything to the A-gap and has two free ILB’s to support the run scraping from A-C gaps (a theme in Hetherman’s defense is to keep those ILB’s free). The Jack is doing a “surf” technique, where he squares to the LOS and shuffles down the LOS. Realistically, this is a “give” look for the QB when the Edge has square shoulders, but he pulls anyway and runs right into the Jack and fumbles the ball. That low safety is inserting himself into the run fit and the defense is rotating into Cover-1 Man post-snap. The low-safety is a Robber if it’s a pass and will Rob the hook zone/slant.
View attachment 327821

After the turnover, Minnesota has a “Call” between the Jack and LB. Impossible to know what they’ve checked to without the call, but you see this sort of communication based on the formation on most plays. Jack communicates to LB, who communicates to Field CB.
View attachment 327822

Remember how I said Hetherman loves to blitz from the opposite side of the RB and push coverage to pass strength. Here he blitzes the CB from the opposite side and gets free. TFL as the give goes right into front. Manufacture numbers in pressure and then make sure you have numbers to both halves. It’s pretty impressive what he does with his Flex defense.
View attachment 327823

If I’m an offense, it wouldn’t take me long to anticipate pressure from opposite RB side, especially when that S comes low. Here he steps low again and that’s exactly where the pressure comes from as it morphs into Cover-1 from a Cover-2 look.
View attachment 327824

Run a Mint Front against trips with a Sniffer off LT. Illinois tries to pull the LT and Sniffer, but the ILB is once again free and makes a big TFL.
View attachment 327825

This is a Mike and S five-man pressure that is pretty cool. They’ll run Palms behind it (Quarters) and blitz both Mike and S into A gaps. This is a great way to get OL and RB to commit and not recognize the S pressure coming behind it.
View attachment 327826

Both Edges pinch and Contain, which funnels any run inside into the A/B gaps. Mike knifes past the C and then the S follows behind completely free. Downside to this play, of course, is if that Mike gets blocked out and the RB makes that S miss in the hole, you’ve got a chance at going out the gate.
View attachment 327827

Even the broadcast puts a circle around this backside Safety as they anticipate the low S inserting and the coverage rolling into MOFC (in this case Cover-1). And again, the pressure is opposite the RB with low S inserting.
View attachment 327828

Once again that S is a Creeper that also becomes a COP. One of the two missed a call or missed their read (either S plays QB too hard when he should’ve been out-to-in or #45 is late).
View attachment 327829

Vs. North Carolina (Offense Overview)

North Carolina ran a Power-Spread in 2024 they called “Power Spread with Tempo.”
  • Run-centered, RPO heavy attack built around the RB (1st rounder)
  • This offense is married in Malzahn system with lots of motion, RPO’s, pullers/traps
  • 11-personnel, but will bring in heavy and unbalanced sets to get defense leveraged
  • Inside zone is staple, but will run more OZ than Illinois
  • Gap scheme runs consist of counters, but more with G/H-back than G/T
  • Similar QB run element as Illinois and look to get Glance/RPO game
  • Orbit motion, Pin-Pull sweeps, pullers a lot more than Illinois
  • Tempo is after explosive plays
  • North Carolina loves to run double-moves to find explosives
  • Four-Verts and Fly/Wheel are two concept staples when they catch you in single-high
Teams run lots of Mint or Tite fronts against the Power Spread offenses in today’s college game to combat the IZ run game and squeeze runners into the ILB, who is kept free in this scheme. Remember, the Jack will be opposite the nickel, who will go to the passing strength to allow the defense to line up quicker. This is an innovation that Kirby Smart started with his Mint fronts after Spread teams beat him up when his rule required the nickel to go to field side of formation and tempo caught them trying to line up often times.

Hetherman is constantly getting his ILB free, but here he doesn’t make the tackle in the hole against Hampton (who is very good).
View attachment 327831

I show this to illustrate what Hetherman was taking over at Minnesota. Kirby Smart lists his pillars of defense and of course winning 3rd down is the money. Hetherman took them from 124th in FBS to 68th at 39.5%.
View attachment 327832

First 3rd and short and UNC goes to Gap-run and utilize their H-Back as a lead blocker against an odd front. You’ll see Minnesota once again looks to pin that run by getting vertical through the A-gap with the nose. This serves as a funnel for the defense to steer the RB directly into the leverage strength of the defense and he’s stopped for a one-yard gain. You can see the S to the opposite side of the RB is inserting himself into the run fit before the RB even has the ball. Backside of the defense is flat-footed with eyes on QB in case he pulls or it’s an RPO.
View attachment 327833

4th down and they go with a single post safety and crowd the A-gap. This formation is a dead giveaway that some form of pressure is coming as that B-gap to the field is completely uncovered. Pressure comes from that LB and the Jack drops to the flat to the boundary to stop the back-shoulder while CB bails to take vertical.
View attachment 327834

They also blitz the nickel to create a five-man pressure. Boundary safety is pressing down on the shallow crosser and there to contest if the QB sees the pressure (he doesn’t). Two defenders to field side have two receivers and are boxing. Inside defender carries the inside two-way go, outside CB matches the carries the outside guy and presses hip. There’s a deep safety for the vertical (shown on the 11-yard line in above snip). QB throws to that sideline receiver and it’s into a tight window and the WR is out of bounds. Turnover on downs.
View attachment 327835

North Carolina has countered the pin action that Minnesota is trying to run in the A gap with just letting him go and hitting him with a backside block. Then a sniffer has released out onto the LB two plays in a row (both big runs for Hampton). This defense is predicated on getting pressure, funneling the runner back into the defense, and keeping the ILB clean. When they don’t replace or they get lost and blocked, they can get gashed in the A-gap. Circled LB by the announcer misses a tackle from backside. #24 is arcing into the C-gap and overplays this one. #9 has the backside Glance in an RPO against that sniffer, so he stays flat-footed until sniffer declares (and gets himself blocked, ha).
View attachment 327836

It happens so frequently, I probably should just stop highlighting it, but pressure comes from the S opposite the RB. He makes a TFL. North Carolina loved that #81 as an offset and turning him into a FB with a slice block (#81 for UNC was really good at being a move TE).
View attachment 327838

Here is a gif from X on how they Creep the S opposite the RB into the B-gap. Again, it’s a staple of the defend to send pressure away from the RB and use the NT to pin zone runs back into the defense, or Gap runs to insert an extra defender.


3rd down is for the pressure plays. Mug the B-gap with a standup LB, communicate it to opposite ILB and the Nickel (two hybrid positions that are asked to do a ton in this defense).
View attachment 327839

Post-snap, the mugger actually drops into the hook in Cover-3 (there is a deep post safety not in screen) and the opposite ILB that he communicated to is actually taking the RB if he releases and spying the QB if he doesn’t release (he releases). Changing that picture post-snap (especially on money downs) is almost a must in today’s college game. (QB escapes to the field side and gets the 1st down here)
View attachment 327840

He got the 1st down, but I’ll take this process and expect they aren’t going to get away most of the time. ILB takes a poor angle here and S loses the ball.
View attachment 327841

You run an unbalanced line against Minnesota and that backside defender is going to pressure almost every time. Comes in free and completely whiffs on the tackle.
View attachment 327842

Johnson must be a better runner than I thought because he scores a TD here. DC gets you a free rusher and a LB in space and you both whiff.
View attachment 327843

Even on the outside the defense is schooled in their technique to funnel everything back inside to the defense. Here, #20 is more concerned with keeping with leverage to the outside as the swing screen is taking place. Stacks and sheds and this pass goes for a loss.
View attachment 327844

On 3rd and long is where Hetherman can use some of his creative packages. Here is a “Penny” front where Mike is to the field side (passing strength). Mug the gaps and then drop one or send all five. Normally play Quarters or cover-1 behind it.
View attachment 327846

Hetherman brings them all but also inserts a Creeper into the pressure package with the nickel. Penny is playing underneath coverage and spying the QB. Goal is to get pressure home before routes can reach the sticks. Penny plants his feet and keeps eyes on QB until the read (RPO mesh) is completed.
View attachment 327847

UNC blocks it up and the Penny has to play the flats and take the H after he releases to the flat as DB’s drop into quarters. QB got skittish in the pockets and turfs it. A good QB probably completes this for a 1st down, but such in life when you bring six and get blocked. This is the play that Max Johnson blew out his knee and was done.
View attachment 327848

This is the single biggest piece of this Tite/Bear/Tilt base front that needs to be remembered is that the defense has to replace that edge contain on every play they squeeze the A/B gaps. Here, they squeeze inside with the Jack, the 4i goes outside to Roscoe (Rush Outside Contain), but the defense replaces the C-gap edge contain with the big nickel who walked out over the #2. It becomes man with that S in bracket, so a Glance route would’ve hurt the defense if it had been the call to the #2, but he goes vertical. You must always keep the numbers on halves of the field in this defense to remain sound. QB tries to run, goes into the back of his blocker, tries to bounce it outside and runs right into new C-gap defender who replaced.
View attachment 327849

3rd-and-long is for the Penny package. Mug the gaps and you can send them all, drop, use Creepers to replace or rush. It’s all about remaining versatile and varied. Breaking tendencies at the correct times. Sometimes it’s C3 (zone), or C1 (man), or Quarters behind it.
View attachment 327850

Here, they dropped both muggers and turned it into zone under in all four quadrants of underneath coverage. QB couldn’t hit the hole shot.
View attachment 327851

Backside S drops into B-gap to handle this Draw play, but Hampton is good, so he makes him miss, gets outside #64 into the C-gap and goes for 20. As far as RB’s seeing this, Hampton really presses the hole and look at the ankle flexion this player has to make jump cuts. Guess that’s why he went 1st round, but the DC did his job.
View attachment 327852

Again, your DC does his job. Has a replacement Contain player who is supposed to play contain outside. Because Hampton is #Good, he goes for the RB and drops too far inside. QB bubbles outside of the Contain player. CB to boundary sees the QB escaping and jumps it. The problem is, of course, that receiver is now running free down the sideline. QB gets it to him for an explosive play. DC does his job, players break their rules (and a QB being fast enough to get outside helped break the rules). #17 to the bottom of the screen has teaching tape on playing Roscoe and keeping one free.
View attachment 327853

Here is a huge play in this game and you can see the rotation happening just at the snap. #2 is now rotating into a zone look, where he gave man cues prior to snap (outside leverage, face-to-face over WR, press look). ILB is already leaning forward to blitz that bubble in open B-gap. 9-teach Edge is going to squeeze and be replaced by that nickel on outside force in the C-gap.
View attachment 327854

Defense pinched and rotated into Quarters behind it. This run is fitted to be funneled all inside and they get the stop for a TFL. The concept of replacement is something that has to be reminded over-and-over to keep leverage and numbers. The Miami defense last year was constantly out leveraged because they didn’t replace consistently enough or fast enough or with proper technique.
View attachment 327855

North Carolina kicks a FG to win it, but Minnesota had their own FG try and missed at the buzzer. Hetherman’s defense did its job big time in this one.


Disagreed
 
In all seriousness: thank you, Lance.

This was an impressive writeup. You're really the best in the business for defensive breakdowns (not like the kind we saw last season) on Canes websites.

I don't truly understand most of it, but I understood enough to want to learn about the rest.
 
Disagreed with the first four words.

The summer solstice marks the beginning of the astronomical summer, so it's not quite upon us.
My oldest daughter said the same thing. "It's actually not summer yet, dad."

Fair enough, ya got me there.
 
Summer is upon us and leaves some time for a visit to the lab and a review of the new coaches at Miami for the 2025 season. The most prominent change Miami saw in their coaching staff was the removal of Lance Guidry as DC, replaced by an up-and-comer in the coaching world, former Minnesota DC Corey Hetherman.

Disclaimer: This article will be wordy, with lots of technical dialogue and more in-depth analysis than I would typically include into one of these. If that’s not your thing, this will not be for you. If it is, sit back, grab a drink, follow along as we dive deeper into Corey Hetherman’s defense, only at Upon Further Review.

What went wrong?
Before diving into Minnesota defense, I want to look back at the failed Guidry era and try to understand where it went wrong. On film, the Guidry defense from Marshall was strong. It brought many different exciting elements including an aggressive 1-gap style, physical man-coverage on the outside, talent development stories, sum of its parts results etc. He earned a stamp of approval from me when I reviewed his past and thought Miami had found a strong new coach.

Where things went wrong are difficult for me to say definitively, but ultimately what it comes down to is I believe that Guidry failed to evolve. Once offenses adapted to the current defensive landscape and found ways to exploit holes in the Miami defense, Guidry was powerless to find answers. Simple motion caused communication issues constantly. Gap movement (adding a gap, moving the bubble etc.) looked like Mandarin to Miami defenders. Tom Herman once famously called Kirby Smart’s defenses the “Palms Up” defense because his pace/tempo had the defenders with their palms up asking what the call was as the ball was being snapped. That’s what defense looked like for Miami last year on most snaps, only Guidry never had the answers on what the call should be.

Calling a great defensive game is often about breaking tendencies, knowing when to call your counters, and when to call pressure. When to set traps, lay bait, or push coverage to the correct areas. All of those things seemed to be off last year after a few injuries happened. Pressure mounted, personalities clashed, and Guidry retreated into a shell defense hoping against hope that the offense would make a mistake so they could get off-the-field. No matter what contributed- be it personnel, injury, talent, or other- Guidry simply could not return after he showed himself incapable of teaching his defense in a way defenders could understand and overcome personnel issues.

Corey Hetherman Defense:

Minnesota last year ran a hybrid defense with multiple fronts, coverages, and pressure packages. Hetherman looked to get his LB’s and DB’s involved in pressure and changed the post-snap picture on the offense often.

Hetherman accomplished all of this by using an odd front that allowed for flexibility to switch spacing, pressure packages, and maintain balance to both sides of the defense (passing strength and run strength). Nick Saban was famous for his defenses finding a way to always maintain numbers to both sides of the field and keep leverage (Saban was the GOAT in teaching outside leverage to his DB’s for maintaining proper leverage and inserting numbers to keep contain).

Minnesota Film:

Vs. Illinois (Offense Overview)


Illinois runs a Pro-Spread they like to call a “Tempro” attack.
  • They run a shotgun based, 11 personnel offense that is multiple in formation packaging
  • Inside-Zone is their bread-and-butter run concept (like most Spread teams)
  • Split-Zone with a slicer TE (usually from a Sniffer alignment) and attach a Glance, Stick, or Bubble as the RPO
  • G/T counter like you’d see from Lincoln Riley is probably their favorite gap concept
  • Use offset H-back as a FB out of Diamond to get numbers for Altmyer to run
  • 3 x 1 Gun looks with Pat Bryant to boundary and get him matched up advantageously
  • Low zone or LOS screens game, especially with Counters or Misdirection
  • Tempo is mainly run on 1st/2nd down and they like to run tempo when they have a formation advantage. When they go “heavy” they tend to slow it down
  • Illinois runs a really cool offense that is difficult to prepare for (I didn’t know it fully before going into this exercise. Their OC is pretty good.)
I won’t walk through every single element for all of the plays but wanted to establish a Baseline of what I am seeing and why it is happening. As we get further along, you (the reader) can identify the reasons already from early explanations.

Minnesota comes out in a 3-4 front with a 4i (covers B-gap) to the passing strength and a 7-tech (covers C-gap between nub TE and LT) to the rushing strength. Passing strength is where more receivers are and rushing strength is where more blockers or larger bodies are (typically side the TE lines up). They also have a Flex Jack LB standing up on the LOS as a 9-tech. A variation of Hetherman’s Base Tite or Mint front.

Coverage wise you see the CB eye-to-eye with the WR aligned square to him. This generally signifies man pre-snap. To the field side, you see the S and CB communicating the coverage. Pre-snap, it is a typical stack with the LB over Slot and the S stacked over the top. The S’s appear to be in cover-2 with Middle of Field Open (MFO).
View attachment 327808

But you see why when he was at James Madison his players were quoted as saying, “super-aggressive, disguise-everything defense” post-snap as the coverage morphs into a different look. Pat Bryant (drafted 3rd round by Broncos goes in motion, the S is already blitzing and to the side he vacated, the ILB that was over Bryant shifts inside.
View attachment 327809

At the snap, Minnesota is slanting and squeezing everything away from the pressure and towards the motion (to keep numbers). The S now replaces the Jack as the Contain player. This inserts the S as a Creeper, while also becoming the COP (Contain Outside Player, but ALSO responsible for the QB). #92 turns his shoulders and runs the heels on the LOS to force the QB to have a keep call on the Zone-Read.
View attachment 327811

You’ll notice that Bryant has flipped his motion to come back counter to initial motion and is now running along the with the mesh on Read and is the third option on this play for a pass. I spoke about the coverage picture changing post-snap and you will see that Minnesota is actually running cover-1 man (MOC), rather than the cover-2 look they gave pre-snap. You’ve also used Odd-spacing to keep your Mike free on this play in run support.

The Creeper S takes his COP role too seriously and let’s Bryant run by him here rather than covering him and forcing QB to run. #4 gets the block on #5 and Bryant has an explosive run down the LOS. It was a great play call by Illinois, as they have the numbers outside even if the S covers Bryant and the QB can pull and run (though it’s probably not as big of a gain).
View attachment 327812

Next play they start in a similar alignment, but the NT is shaded rather than head-up. Spread teams are looking to expose that B-gap with space and you can see the B-gap looks open pre-snap. Passing strength to the field so your edge is aligned in a 5-technique and will probably employ a Roscoe technique (Rush Outside and Contain).
View attachment 327813

Hetherman likes to blitz his nickel from the side opposite of the RB. He can drop that low-safety into the coverage to replace the pressure, keep numbers to both halves of the field, and bring 5-man pressures. I want you to pay attention to another element that the Hetherman defense likes to accomplish; that NT is looking to get across the face of the C and “Pin” the run into pressure. That NT is trying to explode through that gap and not just occupy the C, Pin the A-gap (forcing a RB to bounce), but he is also looking to prevent that pulling T from getting out to the Mike. Illinois is running G/T Counter (A staple run play for Spread Option teams to insert Gap runs into their base offense, this is perhaps THE run play that Lincoln Riley likes to run, especially with a mobile QB). #91 gives a subtle grab of that T’s arm as he tries to get through. Edge to Pass Strength is, in fact, playing Roscoe which forces that G to arc around to get to the pressure.
View attachment 327815

The picture of coverage has once again changed post-snap. Middle defender now has feet planted, eyes on QB, while the defense drops into Cover-3. NT keeps Mike free (an absolute feature of Hetherman’s defense is his ability to keep Mike free) and the defense has pushed everything to that B-gap with a free Mike. TFL.
View attachment 327816

Defense gets to 3rd down, which is where DC’s make their name and their money. Minnesota is running a 5-1 (five-man front, one LB, five DB’s) “Penny” front (I’ve also seen it called Poker).
View attachment 327819

At the snap they run an E/T stunt with coverage having “Eyes-On” QB in Zone. It’s hard to know without the call, but I Minnesota is driving on anything underneath, with the outside CB being responsible for stopping anything outside. CB who is squatting on the hash is “reading” receivers and passing the inside and taking the Seam or anything breaking outside intermediate. The result is a difficult long throw outside the hash for the QB and a punt.
View attachment 327820

Out of a Tite Front, the defense “pushes” everything to the A-gap and has two free ILB’s to support the run scraping from A-C gaps (a theme in Hetherman’s defense is to keep those ILB’s free). The Jack is doing a “surf” technique, where he squares to the LOS and shuffles down the LOS. Realistically, this is a “give” look for the QB when the Edge has square shoulders, but he pulls anyway and runs right into the Jack and fumbles the ball. That low safety is inserting himself into the run fit and the defense is rotating into Cover-1 Man post-snap. The low-safety is a Robber if it’s a pass and will Rob the hook zone/slant.
View attachment 327821

After the turnover, Minnesota has a “Call” between the Jack and LB. Impossible to know what they’ve checked to without the call, but you see this sort of communication based on the formation on most plays. Jack communicates to LB, who communicates to Field CB.
View attachment 327822

Remember how I said Hetherman loves to blitz from the opposite side of the RB and push coverage to pass strength. Here he blitzes the CB from the opposite side and gets free. TFL as the give goes right into front. Manufacture numbers in pressure and then make sure you have numbers to both halves. It’s pretty impressive what he does with his Flex defense.
View attachment 327823

If I’m an offense, it wouldn’t take me long to anticipate pressure from opposite RB side, especially when that S comes low. Here he steps low again and that’s exactly where the pressure comes from as it morphs into Cover-1 from a Cover-2 look.
View attachment 327824

Run a Mint Front against trips with a Sniffer off LT. Illinois tries to pull the LT and Sniffer, but the ILB is once again free and makes a big TFL.
View attachment 327825

This is a Mike and S five-man pressure that is pretty cool. They’ll run Palms behind it (Quarters) and blitz both Mike and S into A gaps. This is a great way to get OL and RB to commit and not recognize the S pressure coming behind it.
View attachment 327826

Both Edges pinch and Contain, which funnels any run inside into the A/B gaps. Mike knifes past the C and then the S follows behind completely free. Downside to this play, of course, is if that Mike gets blocked out and the RB makes that S miss in the hole, you’ve got a chance at going out the gate.
View attachment 327827

Even the broadcast puts a circle around this backside Safety as they anticipate the low S inserting and the coverage rolling into MOFC (in this case Cover-1). And again, the pressure is opposite the RB with low S inserting.
View attachment 327828

Once again that S is a Creeper that also becomes a COP. One of the two missed a call or missed their read (either S plays QB too hard when he should’ve been out-to-in or #45 is late).
View attachment 327829

Vs. North Carolina (Offense Overview)

North Carolina ran a Power-Spread in 2024 they called “Power Spread with Tempo.”
  • Run-centered, RPO heavy attack built around the RB (1st rounder)
  • This offense is married in Malzahn system with lots of motion, RPO’s, pullers/traps
  • 11-personnel, but will bring in heavy and unbalanced sets to get defense leveraged
  • Inside zone is staple, but will run more OZ than Illinois
  • Gap scheme runs consist of counters, but more with G/H-back than G/T
  • Similar QB run element as Illinois and look to get Glance/RPO game
  • Orbit motion, Pin-Pull sweeps, pullers a lot more than Illinois
  • Tempo is after explosive plays
  • North Carolina loves to run double-moves to find explosives
  • Four-Verts and Fly/Wheel are two concept staples when they catch you in single-high
Teams run lots of Mint or Tite fronts against the Power Spread offenses in today’s college game to combat the IZ run game and squeeze runners into the ILB, who is kept free in this scheme. Remember, the Jack will be opposite the nickel, who will go to the passing strength to allow the defense to line up quicker. This is an innovation that Kirby Smart started with his Mint fronts after Spread teams beat him up when his rule required the nickel to go to field side of formation and tempo caught them trying to line up often times.

Hetherman is constantly getting his ILB free, but here he doesn’t make the tackle in the hole against Hampton (who is very good).
View attachment 327831

I show this to illustrate what Hetherman was taking over at Minnesota. Kirby Smart lists his pillars of defense and of course winning 3rd down is the money. Hetherman took them from 124th in FBS to 68th at 39.5%.
View attachment 327832

First 3rd and short and UNC goes to Gap-run and utilize their H-Back as a lead blocker against an odd front. You’ll see Minnesota once again looks to pin that run by getting vertical through the A-gap with the nose. This serves as a funnel for the defense to steer the RB directly into the leverage strength of the defense and he’s stopped for a one-yard gain. You can see the S to the opposite side of the RB is inserting himself into the run fit before the RB even has the ball. Backside of the defense is flat-footed with eyes on QB in case he pulls or it’s an RPO.
View attachment 327833

4th down and they go with a single post safety and crowd the A-gap. This formation is a dead giveaway that some form of pressure is coming as that B-gap to the field is completely uncovered. Pressure comes from that LB and the Jack drops to the flat to the boundary to stop the back-shoulder while CB bails to take vertical.
View attachment 327834

They also blitz the nickel to create a five-man pressure. Boundary safety is pressing down on the shallow crosser and there to contest if the QB sees the pressure (he doesn’t). Two defenders to field side have two receivers and are boxing. Inside defender carries the inside two-way go, outside CB matches the carries the outside guy and presses hip. There’s a deep safety for the vertical (shown on the 11-yard line in above snip). QB throws to that sideline receiver and it’s into a tight window and the WR is out of bounds. Turnover on downs.
View attachment 327835

North Carolina has countered the pin action that Minnesota is trying to run in the A gap with just letting him go and hitting him with a backside block. Then a sniffer has released out onto the LB two plays in a row (both big runs for Hampton). This defense is predicated on getting pressure, funneling the runner back into the defense, and keeping the ILB clean. When they don’t replace or they get lost and blocked, they can get gashed in the A-gap. Circled LB by the announcer misses a tackle from backside. #24 is arcing into the C-gap and overplays this one. #9 has the backside Glance in an RPO against that sniffer, so he stays flat-footed until sniffer declares (and gets himself blocked, ha).
View attachment 327836

It happens so frequently, I probably should just stop highlighting it, but pressure comes from the S opposite the RB. He makes a TFL. North Carolina loved that #81 as an offset and turning him into a FB with a slice block (#81 for UNC was really good at being a move TE).
View attachment 327838

Here is a gif from X on how they Creep the S opposite the RB into the B-gap. Again, it’s a staple of the defend to send pressure away from the RB and use the NT to pin zone runs back into the defense, or Gap runs to insert an extra defender.


3rd down is for the pressure plays. Mug the B-gap with a standup LB, communicate it to opposite ILB and the Nickel (two hybrid positions that are asked to do a ton in this defense).
View attachment 327839

Post-snap, the mugger actually drops into the hook in Cover-3 (there is a deep post safety not in screen) and the opposite ILB that he communicated to is actually taking the RB if he releases and spying the QB if he doesn’t release (he releases). Changing that picture post-snap (especially on money downs) is almost a must in today’s college game. (QB escapes to the field side and gets the 1st down here)
View attachment 327840

He got the 1st down, but I’ll take this process and expect they aren’t going to get away most of the time. ILB takes a poor angle here and S loses the ball.
View attachment 327841

You run an unbalanced line against Minnesota and that backside defender is going to pressure almost every time. Comes in free and completely whiffs on the tackle.
View attachment 327842

Johnson must be a better runner than I thought because he scores a TD here. DC gets you a free rusher and a LB in space and you both whiff.
View attachment 327843

Even on the outside the defense is schooled in their technique to funnel everything back inside to the defense. Here, #20 is more concerned with keeping with leverage to the outside as the swing screen is taking place. Stacks and sheds and this pass goes for a loss.
View attachment 327844

On 3rd and long is where Hetherman can use some of his creative packages. Here is a “Penny” front where Mike is to the field side (passing strength). Mug the gaps and then drop one or send all five. Normally play Quarters or cover-1 behind it.
View attachment 327846

Hetherman brings them all but also inserts a Creeper into the pressure package with the nickel. Penny is playing underneath coverage and spying the QB. Goal is to get pressure home before routes can reach the sticks. Penny plants his feet and keeps eyes on QB until the read (RPO mesh) is completed.
View attachment 327847

UNC blocks it up and the Penny has to play the flats and take the H after he releases to the flat as DB’s drop into quarters. QB got skittish in the pockets and turfs it. A good QB probably completes this for a 1st down, but such in life when you bring six and get blocked. This is the play that Max Johnson blew out his knee and was done.
View attachment 327848

This is the single biggest piece of this Tite/Bear/Tilt base front that needs to be remembered is that the defense has to replace that edge contain on every play they squeeze the A/B gaps. Here, they squeeze inside with the Jack, the 4i goes outside to Roscoe (Rush Outside Contain), but the defense replaces the C-gap edge contain with the big nickel who walked out over the #2. It becomes man with that S in bracket, so a Glance route would’ve hurt the defense if it had been the call to the #2, but he goes vertical. You must always keep the numbers on halves of the field in this defense to remain sound. QB tries to run, goes into the back of his blocker, tries to bounce it outside and runs right into new C-gap defender who replaced.
View attachment 327849

3rd-and-long is for the Penny package. Mug the gaps and you can send them all, drop, use Creepers to replace or rush. It’s all about remaining versatile and varied. Breaking tendencies at the correct times. Sometimes it’s C3 (zone), or C1 (man), or Quarters behind it.
View attachment 327850

Here, they dropped both muggers and turned it into zone under in all four quadrants of underneath coverage. QB couldn’t hit the hole shot.
View attachment 327851

Backside S drops into B-gap to handle this Draw play, but Hampton is good, so he makes him miss, gets outside #64 into the C-gap and goes for 20. As far as RB’s seeing this, Hampton really presses the hole and look at the ankle flexion this player has to make jump cuts. Guess that’s why he went 1st round, but the DC did his job.
View attachment 327852

Again, your DC does his job. Has a replacement Contain player who is supposed to play contain outside. Because Hampton is #Good, he goes for the RB and drops too far inside. QB bubbles outside of the Contain player. CB to boundary sees the QB escaping and jumps it. The problem is, of course, that receiver is now running free down the sideline. QB gets it to him for an explosive play. DC does his job, players break their rules (and a QB being fast enough to get outside helped break the rules). #17 to the bottom of the screen has teaching tape on playing Roscoe and keeping one free.
View attachment 327853

Here is a huge play in this game and you can see the rotation happening just at the snap. #2 is now rotating into a zone look, where he gave man cues prior to snap (outside leverage, face-to-face over WR, press look). ILB is already leaning forward to blitz that bubble in open B-gap. 9-teach Edge is going to squeeze and be replaced by that nickel on outside force in the C-gap.
View attachment 327854

Defense pinched and rotated into Quarters behind it. This run is fitted to be funneled all inside and they get the stop for a TFL. The concept of replacement is something that has to be reminded over-and-over to keep leverage and numbers. The Miami defense last year was constantly out leveraged because they didn’t replace consistently enough or fast enough or with proper technique.
View attachment 327855

North Carolina kicks a FG to win it, but Minnesota had their own FG try and missed at the buzzer. Hetherman’s defense did its job big time in this one.


Good **** OP! Being a defensive guy, this stuff was right in my wheelhouse. Nice breakdown.
 
Back
Top