Recruit Notebook - Chad Thomas

Recruit Notebook - Chad Thomas

Cameron Underwood

Comments (51)

The talent at DE is getting back to where it should always be at the U.
 
I attended the BTW v Norcross game a couple of weeks ago and there is no denying Thomas' talent, but he definitely needs to bulk up a little bit to have an impact for us next year.
 
Not many HS DEs are ready to be every down guys in college, but Thomas is better equiped than most. He clearly needs to develop his body muscle wise, but his functional strenth is very impressive and he has excellent leverage, especially for a guy his height. I like the JPP comparison because Thomas probably ends up at 270-280, but he has a lot of Jason Taylor in him, who was a great run defender even when he was 235-245 at 6-6, because of his leverage and functional strength. He's not going to be an every down end as a freshmen, because he won't need to be, but I'll be shocked if Thomas isn't a dominant run and pass defender in 2 years.
 
Look, I saw the play at the Opening where he ran over Damien Mama. That, as an isolated play, WAS F*CKING AWESOME!!!!

However, Thomas doesn't show that strength on a consistent basis. He himself has said he needs to improve his strength.

Chad Thomas should be a 5* prospect by the time the process is over, so yes, I'm nitpicking. I'm not saying he's some Poindexter without an ounce of strength, but to be consistently successful at the Collegiate level, he will need to add size and functional strength.
 
Advertisement
Not many HS DEs are ready to be every down guys in college, but Thomas is better equiped than most. He clearly needs to develop his body muscle wise, but his functional strenth is very impressive and he has excellent leverage, especially for a guy his height. I like the JPP comparison because Thomas probably ends up at 270-280, but he has a lot of Jason Taylor in him, who was a great run defender even when he was 235-245 at 6-6, because of his leverage and functional strength. He's not going to be an every down end as a freshmen, because he won't need to be, but I'll be shocked if Thomas isn't a dominant run and pass defender in 2 years.

Agreed.

Key part of this statement: IN 2 YEARS.
 
Look, I saw the play at the Opening where he ran over Damien Mama. That, as an isolated play, WAS F*CKING AWESOME!!!!

However, Thomas doesn't show that strength on a consistent basis. He himself has said he needs to improve his strength.

Chad Thomas should be a 5* prospect by the time the process is over, so yes, I'm nitpicking. I'm not saying he's some Poindexter without an ounce of strength, but to be consistently successful at the Collegiate level, he will need to add size and functional strength.

Would you say he's stronger than AQM at the same stage?
 
but to be consistently successful at the Collegiate level, he will need to add size and functional strength.

Appreciate your work and I thought the write-up was great. But you could literally be talking about any single HS DL prospect in the nation with this sentence and it would be equally or more true.

From what I've observed, the thing that makes Thomas special is that regardless of his weight or strength numbers, he has a functional strength (often referred to as "farmboy strength" but I doubt Thomas has spent much time on a farm) that allows him to almost always dictate upon contact with a blocker. What's especially promising about that with Thomas is that he appears to clearly not be anywhere near his developmental ceiling (in contrast with AQM who I would say is closer to his peak weight), and he should be able to add a lot more weight without losing any of his burst, explosiveness, etc.

He has to refine his technique mostly, and not always rely on engaging with an OL just to beat him IMO.
 
It was hard to judge his pass rushing skills in their televised game because he spent so much time at DT, but it did show me he has the strngth to anchor against the run and he was consistently penetrating and disrupting running plays.
 
Advertisement
Look, I saw the play at the Opening where he ran over Damien Mama. That, as an isolated play, WAS F*CKING AWESOME!!!!

However, Thomas doesn't show that strength on a consistent basis. He himself has said he needs to improve his strength.

Chad Thomas should be a 5* prospect by the time the process is over, so yes, I'm nitpicking. I'm not saying he's some Poindexter without an ounce of strength, but to be consistently successful at the Collegiate level, he will need to add size and functional strength.

Would you say he's stronger than AQM at the same stage?

IMO, no
 
Look, I saw the play at the Opening where he ran over Damien Mama. That, as an isolated play, WAS F*CKING AWESOME!!!!

However, Thomas doesn't show that strength on a consistent basis. He himself has said he needs to improve his strength.

Chad Thomas should be a 5* prospect by the time the process is over, so yes, I'm nitpicking. I'm not saying he's some Poindexter without an ounce of strength, but to be consistently successful at the Collegiate level, he will need to add size and functional strength.

Would you say he's stronger than AQM at the same stage?

IMO, no

Interesting. My eyes say something different. Chad seems to lack weight room strength, but looks like he has better strength (at the same time) that comes from hips. The way he bends and times his explosion, he looks like a wrestler. If he starts a weight program in January, by August I think he'll be as strong (as it relates to the field) as any DE we've had here in a while.

I haven't gotten a chance to watch him live this year. Looking forward to it.
 
Look, I saw the play at the Opening where he ran over Damien Mama. That, as an isolated play, WAS F*CKING AWESOME!!!!

However, Thomas doesn't show that strength on a consistent basis. He himself has said he needs to improve his strength.

Chad Thomas should be a 5* prospect by the time the process is over, so yes, I'm nitpicking. I'm not saying he's some Poindexter without an ounce of strength, but to be consistently successful at the Collegiate level, he will need to add size and functional strength.

LULZ. This dude is ALL functional strength. He's country strong like Warren Sapp was, and that country strength, unlike weight room strength, never wears off. You're commenting on matters that you don't know if you think this guy isn't functionally strong or if you think AQM was stronger at the same stage.
 
Advertisement
Look, I saw the play at the Opening where he ran over Damien Mama. That, as an isolated play, WAS F*CKING AWESOME!!!!

However, Thomas doesn't show that strength on a consistent basis. He himself has said he needs to improve his strength.

Chad Thomas should be a 5* prospect by the time the process is over, so yes, I'm nitpicking. I'm not saying he's some Poindexter without an ounce of strength, but to be consistently successful at the Collegiate level, he will need to add size and functional strength.

Would you say he's stronger than AQM at the same stage?

IMO, no

Interesting. My eyes say something different. Chad seems to lack weight room strength, but looks like he has better strength (at the same time) that comes from hips. The way he bends and times his explosion, he looks like a wrestler. If he starts a weight program in January, by August I think he'll be as strong (as it relates to the field) as any DE we've had here in a while.

I haven't gotten a chance to watch him live this year. Looking forward to it.

I dont remember seeing Quan play on the inside and collapse the pocket with a simple bull rush. C Thomas is gonna be a monster in our system. You can tell the kid is supremely strong for his size, and his frame allows for him to get bigger. This is gonna be the type of kid that can take on blockers and hold the edge, but at the same time pin his years back and get to the QB.
 
Advertisement
Look, I saw the play at the Opening where he ran over Damien Mama. That, as an isolated play, WAS F*CKING AWESOME!!!!

However, Thomas doesn't show that strength on a consistent basis. He himself has said he needs to improve his strength.

Chad Thomas should be a 5* prospect by the time the process is over, so yes, I'm nitpicking. I'm not saying he's some Poindexter without an ounce of strength, but to be consistently successful at the Collegiate level, he will need to add size and functional strength.

Would you say he's stronger than AQM at the same stage?

IMO, no

No way
 
This scouting report just reeks of somebody who tries to write a scouting report with buzzwords who doesn't know the important parts. Like "above average" "decent size for a high school player at 6'6" 240." Lol. Come on man? Where is the burst vs the run? Where is the lock-out to set the edge? Where is the shoulder turn either upside or down the line? Where is the blocker shedding? Where is the 1st step burst? Where is the double team iso as a DT? Where is the body control? Where is the hands analysis? Where is the down/standing field analysis?
 
Honestly, my favorite part is when he compares Thomas not being Clowney or Julius peppers, but has "above average athleticism." LOL. That was said.
 
Thomas is the safest bet in the class.

Huge frame, athletic, high motor, character off the field. He's going to be big, strong and good.
 
Back
Top