Miami Emerges As Favorite For Duke Transfer QB Darian Mensah

Trinton Breeze
1 min read

Comments (4481)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Going to start having that narrative that players will be over recruited by transfers at receiver like we have at qb right now. Not a good thing, no one is saying don’t take transfers at the position just don’t over do it. 2 is fine … 3 however is overkill
We just had a true freshman receiver lead the ACC in receiving…
 
Do we think one of Jacobs/ Vaughn re-enter the portal.
 
Don’t get me wrong this is my stance , I’m all for getting barkate because he’s one of the best receivers next season just wish it was a combo of Jacobs and bakarate vs a total of 3 transfers at the position .
 
Jojo, Josh Moore, upshaw all a possibility, what’s the point of them staying? What message does that send adding 3 transfer receivers. These kids want to play
1. Jojo - who cares if he bolts? He can drop passes somewhere else.

2. Upshaw - pretty sure Pete and DMoney said on the pod that he’s out for spring with the foot injury so who knows what he’ll contribute.

3. Moore - he flashed but can you really say he showed enough to trust him as a guaranteed contributor on a team trying to make another natty run? We weren’t deep at receiver this year and he didn’t get much burn, so what does that tell you?
 
Don’t get me wrong this is my stance , I’m all for getting barkate because he’s one of the best receivers next season just wish it was a combo of Jacobs and bakarate vs a total of 3 transfers at the position .
Think it would be different if we knew someone like Moore or trader or wingo were guaranteed to be crazy productive. We just can’t take that chance
 
1. Jojo - who cares if he bolts? He can drop passes somewhere else.

2. Upshaw - pretty sure Pete and DMoney said on the pod that he’s out for spring with the foot injury so who knows what he’ll contribute.

3. Moore - he flashed but can you really say he showed enough to trust him as a guaranteed contributor on a team trying to make another natty run? We weren’t deep at receiver this year and he didn’t get much burn, so what does that tell you?
I'm in the same mentality mold as a lot of these kids are as it relates to a title. I'm all for who's going to make this team better to finish the job next year. If you have a problem with a guy that could take your spot come in, there's the transfer portal. This is the new climate of CFB, adapt, or turn into Clemson.
 
Think it would be different if we knew someone like Moore or trader or wingo were guaranteed to be crazy productive. We just can’t take that chance
this. especially when you're paying millions for a 1 year transfer qb. cant spend all that money at QB then surround him with potential at WR. cause if that protentional doesnt blossom then you spent millions on a qb for nothing. just the tough side of the big time transfer qb game.
 
Going to start having that narrative that players will be over recruited by transfers at receiver like we have at qb right now. Not a good thing, no one is saying don’t take transfers at the position just don’t over do it. 2 is fine … 3 however is overkill

Pringle and Simpson played alot as true freshmen and they bolted anyways.
This is no longer the 1970s where you build a roster for 2-3 years into the future.
You have to recruit every position every year.
As K9 noted, everyone is on one year contracts.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top