Josh Pate Lists Miami #6 on his Early Top 25

DMoney
DMoney
6 min read
Josh Pate release his Early Top 25 rankings and placed the Canes just outside the Top 5. His list, and explanation for each ranking, is below.

#25 Washington

I’ll start at the bottom. Washington at 25. I honestly don’t know what the dynamic is up there right now. I haven’t talked to Demond Williams ever, let alone since he tried to leave, found out the door was locked, and then said, “Never mind, I’m staying.” I have no idea what that does to a locker room. I just don’t. So I’m cautious. That’s why they’re here.

#24 Louisville

Louisville at 24 feels like one of the safest bets in the country. Jeff Brohm has those guys floating in this range almost every year. They’re solid, they’re organized, and the floor doesn’t feel much lower than this.

#23 Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt at 23. A lot of newness. Is Jared Curtis starting as a true freshman? Maybe. But they’ve earned the right to be talked about here—although let’s be honest, it’s February. What has anyone truly earned yet?

#22 Iowa

Iowa at 22. Solid bowl game, which technically matters none in this exercise, but still. These are proven commodities. Teams where the floor feels pretty firm.

#21 Missouri

Missouri at 21. Another program that’s just kind of there every year. Reliable, competitive, not flashy, but not falling apart either.

#20 SMU

SMU at 20. I’m buying a little more SMU stock than the public right now. That could change, but in February, I like what I see.

#19 Utah

Utah at 19. Same story as always—tough, physical, disciplined. They usually find a way to matter.

#18 Houston

Houston at 18. I hinted at this the other night—I’m kind of feeling Houston right now. I’ve got eight months to change my mind, but today? I like them.

#17 Michigan

Michigan at 17. Transition period, but still Michigan. There’s enough institutional stability to keep them in this range.

#16 Ole Miss

Ole Miss at 16, with a massive asterisk. Nobody knows what’s happening with Trinidad Chambliss. He could be quarterbacking Ole Miss. He could be working for this show next year. If he’s there, they’re probably higher than 16. If not, this feels about right.

#15 Penn State

This one’s going to make people mad. Penn State at 15. I’m banking on stability. I like the coaching staff they brought in. They imported dependable parts of the Iowa State roster and recruiting classes. I’m projecting a higher floor here. If you’re yelling overrated, that’s fine—I didn’t put them top five. I put them 15th. Name me 15 teams that clearly deserve to start higher in February.

#14 BYU

BYU at 14. Over the last five seasons, they’ve got the eighth-best winning percentage in the country. Sitake is back. Bachmeier is back. They’re proven, and they’re still hungry because in some people’s minds, if you haven’t won a national title, you haven’t won anything.

#13 Alabama

Alabama at 13. This feels weird to say, but it can’t get worse. They made the playoff last year while being terrible at running the ball. They’re changing offensive line staff, reshaping the run game, and I like their quarterback situation whether it’s Keelan Russell or Austin Mack. There’s upside here, but I don’t trust it fully out of the gate.

#12 Texas Tech

Texas Tech at 12. Top-five portal team. Brendan Sorsby in. This doesn’t feel like a one-year flash. This feels like program stability. I will never doubt their portal execution again after last year.

#11 USC

Yes, USC at 11. This is a faith ranking. Lincoln Riley had his “we’re changing everything” moment, and it started to work. The defense improved. Gary Patterson is now the defensive coordinator. They’ve got a third-year quarterback and the number-one recruiting class. I’m not saying we look smart yet—but I think we stop looking stupid.

#10 LSU

LSU at 10, even though the ceiling is way higher. Blake Baker stayed. The coordinator situation is strong. Number-two portal class. I think they peak late, not early, so this is where they start for me.

#9 Oklahoma

Oklahoma at 9. They feel like a playoff-caliber program most years. More experience, but they’ve got to fix the run game. Still, this feels right.

#8 Texas A&M

Texas A&M at 8. Marcel Reed just has to be better in big games—but even his “best” last year was good enough to make the playoff. Top-five talent acquisition program. The baseline roster is there.

#7 Georgia

Georgia at 7. Even when they’re “off,” they win the SEC. Gunnar Stockton is back. Kirby Smart is still Kirby Smart. Seven might actually be low.

#6 Miami

Miami at 6. Darian Mensah may be an upgrade at quarterback. Mark Fletcher’s back. Malachi Toney is another year older. The offensive line is replacing a lot, but with Mario Cristobal and Alex Mirabal, that’s a high-floor position group. I like the defensive line and Cory Hetherman entering year two as DC.

#5 Oregon

Oregon at 5. They felt like a year away last season—and now they’re here. Dante Moore is back. Better injury luck, more continuity. This is a playoff-level team.

#4 Ohio State

Ohio State at 4. Extremely high floor. Quarterback experience, Jeremiah Smith back, NFL-level coordinators. Four might even be low.

#3 Indiana

Indiana at 3. I’m not blindly trusting them—but I kind of am. Josh Hoover fits seamlessly. Portal backfills worked. The coordinators are still together. After the last two years, I trust the DNA.

#2 Texas

Texas at 2. Arch Manning’s finish mattered. They upgraded the running back room aggressively—Raleek Brown, Hollywood Smothers. Cam Coleman and Wingo at receiver. Will Muschamp coaching defense. This is a loaded team.

#1 Notre Dame

Notre Dame at 1. They have everything I want in February: CJ Carr at quarterback, a complete roster, elite staffing, and hunger. They’re machine-like right now. They’re stacking coaches, calling guys co-DCs just to make it work. They’ve been close. They’re still chasing the belt. So yes—Notre Dame is number one. And yes, it’s February. They could be out of the top 10 by August. That’s the fun of it.

 

Comments (42)

I think we would be higher if we didn’t have the OL departures. I like how we stack up against everyone ahead of us. Ohio State lost more than we did. Oregon is paper tiger until proven otherwise. He leaned heavily on returning QBs which is fine. Will hope for a top 5 ranking because it helps us with selection.
 
Everything Pate said about ND is true. Their roster is loaded. But they have to spot the ball eventually.
 
Notre Dame had a schedule as weak as wet toilet paper after they played and lost to TAMU. The one semi-legit program left in their final year 10 games was Pitt, and Narduzzi literally said he didn’t care about the game because it wasn’t an ACC game. Going to be a rude awakening for them and their fanboys when they play real teams again.

And it is laughable to call a team “hungry” when they rage-quit at the end of the season. “Hungry” is beating up an opponent in a bowl game to show the playoff committee they should have picked them. I think the words he is looking for are “entitled and spoiled”.
 
I know ND schedule is bad, but why so much faith to be #1 when they lose a lot of explosiveness and production with Love/Price, Fields, Raridon?
 
Notre Dame had a schedule as weak as wet toilet paper after they played and lost to TAMU. The one semi-legit program left in their final year 10 games was Pitt, and Narduzzi literally said he didn’t care about the game because it wasn’t an ACC game. Going to be a rude awakening for them and their fanboys when they play real teams again.

And it is laughable to call a team “hungry” when they rage-quit at the end of the season. “Hungry” is beating up an opponent in a bowl game to show the playoff committee they should have picked them. I think the words he is looking for are “entitled and spoiled”.
The reasoning behind Notre Dame and not Miami or even a few other teams is kinda comical.
 
death, taxes, and overrated notre dame

Yeah I am surprised Pate drank the Kool Aid. He seems to be pretty astute about football but it’s odd that he expresses doubts about other teams but not the one that ran through a pathetic schedule after losing to the only 2 good teams they played, and then quit at the end of the season because things didn’t go their way.

I know I am being a homer here but any person who knows football knows that a Cristobal team is going to have a good offensive line. And on defense we have four 5 stars plus studs from the portal. whatever UM lost is more than made up for by Mensah being a massive upgrade over Beck. Miami got exponentially better at QB and skill position players.

I don’t think we take a step back but I can understand thinking it will be 90% of the 2025 team.

Using Steiner math-

90% trenches is 10% less than 2025, but Mensah is 15% better than Beck, and skill players are 10% better. Thats comes out to 115%. That means Miami 2026 team is 15% better than the 2025 team. Miami already had a 1/3 chance of playing for the title. Now add that 15% , it gives Miami a 48 1/3 chance of winning a national championship in 2026.
 
Last edited:
Next person who says spot the ball will have a big problem on their hands.

Anyone else think IU will regress without their QB, RBs, WRs, most of their top tacklers?
 
So we're questioning Miami's OL but not ND's who had 2 guys declare early and starting center had ACL surgery in late October?

I think they lack talent at WR, drop off at TE and obviously RB, a mediocre DL, good LBs but the best player had ACL surgery in October or November, and a good secondary but still majorly overrated because of Leonard Moore. Gray and everyone they took out of the portal are mediocre.
 
Back
Top