D$ shares exclusive spring practice insights

D$ shares exclusive spring practice insights

DMoney
DMoney

Comments (328)

By mid season I expect Wayne to take his spot

Will be interesting to see the pairings. I loved the Wayne commit and wouldn't be surprised to see him play a lot. On the other hand, Messidor is going to be a mainstay on one side, Harvey is going to be heavily in the rotation. And I expect Kelly and Bain will see a ton of action.
 

“Two-tight end sets, otherwise known as 12 personnel, have become increasingly popular over the last few years. The grouping features one running back, two tight ends and two wide receivers.

Georgia used 12 personnel at times last season. but will use it much more often this year and with more variety. The Bulldogs have two uber-talented tight ends in Darnell Washington and Brock Bowers and coaches want them on the field at the same time.”

12 doesn’t mean we’re running 80% of plays. But what does Monken know.
If you were the coach instead of Snelly on the 80s, you would have been running the wishbone. It works for Nebraska!

If you are so adamant on being a follower, the offense should be more OhSt/Day than UGA/Monken bc it fits the recruiting base better.
 
The gurus have spoken.

Not really. UGA uses air raid concepts like most teams. The comparison between our TEs is moot because the ORIGINAL criticism was “Neanderthal Mario bro” in nature. When pointing out prominent teams use it, are using it MORE and that it does NOT necessarily mean a run heavy scheme goes against the narrative it morphs to “our TEs aren’t as good”. What does that matter? Nobody has UGAs TEs, does they mean nobody else can use 12? Neither are our WRs - everyone acknowledges this. You want more WR heavy sets if Skinner out there is a better option for both run and pass (assumption)?

TLDR: Mario was again declared bro style limiting Dawson simply because of 12 usage, when this is completely unfounded.
 
If you were the coach instead of Snelly on the 80s, you would have been running the wishbone. It works for Nebraska!

If you are so adamant on being a follower, the offense should be more OhSt/Day than UGA/Monken bc it fits the recruiting base better.

You’re just projecting now. Follower because someone stated Mario’s holding Dawson back because of 12? If you want to think so.

If you or moss show evidence of this then fine. Even at Houston Dawsons run/pass flipped year to year.
 
Advertisement
You’re just projecting now. Follower because someone stated Mario’s holding Dawson back because of 12? If you want to think so.

If you or moss show evidence of this then fine. Even at Houston Dawsons run/pass flipped year to year.
I’m all for running the ball. I’m against inviting more defensive players into the box and then running the ball. It should be a numbers game. See Art Briles.

Trying to pass it off like we have such a talented set of TEs, when we don’t, seems like typical offseason fodder.
 
I was coming into this thread just to see if you had already posted. How we end the portal will be the difference between 6-6 and 8-4. It's that bigly.
I know what happened last year and I know we do it every year but I think the schedule is very manageable outside the top 4 games vs A&M, unc, fsu, and clemson
 
Not really. UGA uses air raid concepts like most teams. The comparison between our TEs is moot because the ORIGINAL criticism was “Neanderthal Mario bro” in nature. When pointing out prominent teams use it, are using it MORE and that it does NOT necessarily mean a run heavy scheme goes against the narrative it morphs to “our TEs aren’t as good”. What does that matter? Nobody has UGAs TEs, does they mean nobody else can use 12? Neither are our WRs - everyone acknowledges this. You want more WR heavy sets if Skinner out there is a better option for both run and pass (assumption)?

TLDR: Mario was again declared bro style limiting Dawson simply because of 12 usage, when this is completely unfounded.

If I was a Neanderthal, I'd be insulted.

Even though Neanderthals ARE extinct now - with their run-heavy offense -

Whereas Cro-Magnons used Archery and spear throwing. "Things through the air . . . "
 
Watch TVD and the receivers put up huge numbers this year. Everyone who blamed them for last year's garbage will finally see the difference a scheme can make. ****, maybe we'll actually be able to convince a WR to sign with us in the 2024 class.
 
Advertisement
I know what happened last year and I know we do it every year but I think the schedule is very manageable outside the top 4 games vs A&M, unc, fsu, and clemson
Outside of OL and LB, what position group is clearly better than last year?
 
Good stuff, D. I am not as bullish as you are about our DL. Obviously, Mesidor is our stud and Taylor has the potential to be that dude but needs to be consistent. Beyond those guys, there are a lot of ifs, buts, and undersized dudes.
It's easy to forget because everything else was so bad, but we finished 9th nationally in sacks per game (5th in P5). And we didn't go crazy blitzing. Deen is also an addition with proven P5 production.

The key will be adding a big dude to replace Darrell Jackson and shore up the run defense. Moten's progression has been very encouraging, but we need another guy.
 
Advertisement
It's easy to forget because everything else was so bad, but we finished 9th nationally in sacks per game (5th in P5). And we didn't go crazy blitzing. Deen is also an addition with proven P5 production.

The key will be adding a big dude to replace Darrell Jackson and shore up the run defense. Moten's progression has been very encouraging, but we need another guy.
For Gore, is there just a longer acclimation period with him? Or should we kind of expect him to provide depth and not much else? Not that I was even remotely close to expecting first-team production, but rather believed he would fit in well on specific pass-rushing downs and maybe generate 5-6 sacks plus a handful of more pressures.
 
Advertisement
I actually thought that update was pretty level-headed compared to last year and very little fluff.

I don’t think it was over the top, but comparing and contrasting what was written re: different groups has me telling myself, wait and see, wait and see

Examples:
- we’ll see more 12 because of our talented TEs, then lists out with injury, blocking TE, needs to grow, needs to catch the ball and no mention of our starter because he’s injured
- our OL is strong vs. our DL will be a strength once we get 5 injured players back and a portal add
- WRs - some still struggling plus spotty CBs

It’s spring. Let’s get better and healthy!
 
Back
Top