4-star UT commit Couch changes gears, names Michigan and Miami to top 2

4-star UT commit Couch changes gears, names Michigan and Miami to top 2

Stefan Adams

Comments (78)

Gotta believe we take 1 of him or Jaden Davis....Wonder who commits 1st
 
Just had a follow-up talk with Couch to clear it up. Even though he clearly said 5'7" in the interview audio, Couch said he misspoke and meant 5'11", not 5'7". For what it's worth, standing next to him and talking to him yesterday, I didn't think he was 5'7" based on my own height of 5'10.5", more closer to 5'9" or 5'10".

Also measured in at 5'10" at the Rivals 3 Stripe Miami Camp last month.
https://www.canesinsight.com/news/u...s-at-rivals-3-stripe-miami-camp-defense.5202/

So take it for what you will.

Thanks for checking, that makes more sense. 2 inches doesn't seem like much, but at the low end I feel like it's important.
 
When it comes to the height and weight of players, I only trust Brock. He knows it all.

And a lot of people are overlooking the obvious takeaway here, which is that Rumph has us on the brink of flipping a 4-star DB to UM.

I'm not a Rumph basher, but come on. You know he doesn't get credit until the kid actually signs.
 
And for every 5’7” dB that makes it there are 75 that don’t. Let’s not act like every small kid is going to pan out. Heck even in the case of bandy, we haven’t seen enough yet to say he’s not gonna get abused by bigger guys at some point. It doesn’t mean he’s not a take but if it’s between him and a similar guys who’s 3-4” taller for one spot. Your probably taking the bigger body.


I hear you BUT with all due respect, for every 6'-2" guy that makes it there are also 75 that don't. There are more 6'2" college corners than you & I can count, that get abused by bigger guys & smaller ones at some point.

I do hear what you're saying... but I think that anyone who focuses on someone's size VERSUS someone's actual ability to handle his position and do his job, does his team a grave disservice.

IF Couch consistently gets the job done and mind you he was at an UA event featuring some of the best receivers in the nation, holding them to one catch and we're gonna hold up our nose like that doesn't signify major talent!!?? Then there is something wrong with us NOT him. Btw he received an invite to the UA game and was named one of the outstanding players.

Good to see that there is NOTHING WRONG with our staff. Because we're after him with a hard-on, just like Michigan and Tennessee et al.......
all of whom play several teams with big-bodied WR's.

Yes I'll admit in some circumstances size can size can be an advantage or disadvantage especially on goal line situations. But the same disadvantage can be said for that 6'2" guy because he'll have a similar problem guarding a smaller shiftier WR.s in the open field. So what does it really boil down to? Its always about your talent. As for being abused, I've seen innumerable taller DB's getting abused and owned on the field by receivers of all sizes..

Size never kept the Redskins Daryl Green from consistently being an ALL-Pro DB in a league full of bigger WR's. Seriously doubt they ever viewed him as a liability throughout his star-studded HOF career. As usual, it boils down to who has the best talent. DG is NOT alone, there have been numerous short DB's that have excelled in College and in the Pro's, it s not an anomaly, its all about can you do the job.

So if its between two guys with different sizes One bigger One smaller?.....I'll always go with the One ( regardless of his size) who more consistently gets the job done i.e. has more talent. So let the BEST MAN win...not just the one who is bigger
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
I hear you BUT with all due respect, for every 6'-2" guy that makes it there are also 75 that don't. There are more 6'2" college corners than you & I can count, that get abused by bigger guys & smaller ones at some point.

I do hear what you're saying... but I think that anyone who focuses on someone's size VERSUS someone's actual ability to handle his position and do his job, does his team a grave disservice.

IF Couch consistently gets the job done and mind you he was at an UA event featuring some of the best receivers in the nation, holding them to one catch and we're gonna hold up our nose like that doesn't signify major talent!!?? Then there is something wrong with us NOT him. Btw he received an invite to the UA game and was named one of the outstanding players.

Good to see that there is NOTHING WRONG with our staff. Because we're after him with a hard-on, just like Michigan and Tennessee et al.......
all of whom play several teams with big-bodied WR's.

Yes I'll admit in some circumstances size can size can be an advantage or disadvantage especially on goal line situations. But the same disadvantage can be said for that 6'2" guy because he'll have a similar problem guarding a smaller shiftier WR.s in the open field. So what does it really boil down to? Its always about your talent. As for being abused, I've seen innumerable taller DB's getting abused and owned on the field by receivers of all sizes..

Size never kept the Redskins Daryl Green from consistently being an ALL-Pro DB in a league full of bigger WR's. Seriously doubt they ever viewed him as a liability throughout his star-studded HOF career. As usual, it boils down to who has the best talent. DG is NOT alone, there have been numerous short DB's that have excelled in College and in the Pro's, it s not an anomaly, its all about can you do the job.

So if its between two guys with different sizes One bigger One smaller?.....I'll always go with the One ( regardless of his size) who more consistently gets the job done i.e. has more talent. So let the BEST MAN win...not just the one who is bigger


But again, its easy to choose one or two anomalies. It turns out this kid is taller than that. But 5.7" is **** small. Like borderline too small. Bob Sanders, etc etc. But they are the exception not the rule. Look at the best in most any position and they are at the least average height for their position height. I mean sure theres drew brees, but lets compare the past few short qbs, how did it work out for them? Why then is the average size of a DB closer to 6'? Because size matters. Height, thats something you can't teach. Sure you can situationally, beat a bigger guy, but your not going to on average.

Why do teams value big WR? When theres Antonio Brown or Julian Edelman? Because there are more Philip Dorsett's than there are Antonio Brown's. So if I am taking my chances I am going with the guy 6'+. Again, not that its totally legitimate because this kid has come out and said he's much taller than that. I am just standing by my point that height matters.
 
Flying around all over the field was Couch, who was as pesky as they come on Sunday. It was hard for receivers to separate from him all day and the performance paid off in Couch receiving an invite to the UA Game.
But again, its easy to choose one or two anomalies. It turns out this kid is taller than that. But 5.7" is **** small. Like borderline too small. Bob Sanders, etc etc. But they are the exception not the rule. Look at the best in most any position and they are at the least average height for their position height. I mean sure theres drew brees, but lets compare the past few short qbs, how did it work out for them? Why then is the average size of a DB closer to 6'? Because size matters. Height, thats something you can't teach. Sure you can situationally, beat a bigger guy, but your not going to on average.

Why do teams value big WR? When theres Antonio Brown or Julian Edelman? Because there are more Philip Dorsett's than there are Antonio Brown's. So if I am taking my chances I am going with the guy 6'+. Again, not that its totally legitimate because this kid has come out and said he's much taller than that. I am just standing by my point that height matters.


I hear ya and understand the point you're making. We simply just disagree.

Given a choice, I'm always going with the one with more talent, not automatically with the one with more size.

As I said before, anyone who dismisses someone because of size does he team a disservice if he is seeking the best performers on his team. You can't determine someone's talent for a position just by measuring someone's height or weight.

That's why teams use a wide variety of factors in assessing a draftees suitability for the Pro's. Someone's physical measurable's, is only one of many considerations. Not the end all, catch all. Many other important things are measured and considered. Some of these many factors are more important for a position than others.

But in the end ....having the talent and the ability to do the job always matters more than anything else.
 
Advertisement
he's at Michigan this weekend. getting a few crystal balls to them as well.
 
He's 5'9 1/2 and 155pds as of last month.
 
he's at Michigan this weekend. getting a few crystal balls to them as well.

Let's see if Ivins or a National guy actually puts in a CB.

The Michigan mods claimed last year we got Brevin and Mallory because they "cooled" on them. And they claimed the same thing with Solomon. Maybe Couch does commit there but I'd take those predictions with a grain of salt, those guys can't imagine a kid would ever choose Miami over Michigan
 
Advertisement
I’d like to add this guy and let him learn behind Muddy Bandy for two years. I want him but if he goes to Michigan, I’m not losing sleep over it.
 
Advertisement
im not that high on him with that size. Especially when there are guys like Dixon from Tampa available..who can play in the slot in a heartbeat/
How receptive is he to Miami? I feel like I remember reading early on he was an FSU lean.
 
im not that high on him with that size. Especially when there are guys like Dixon from Tampa available..who can play in the slot in a heartbeat/

He's my favorite of the CBs we are in on (other than Stevenson who could be CB or S). But do we have a legitimate chance with him?
 
I think Dixon has a coach that is on the board. His tape is legit..reminds me of a faster Brandon Harris, Vernon Hargreaves type

Really like this kid. Elite speed that we've been missing. When these top DBs get drafted year in and year out, this is usually what they're high school highlights looked like. Rumph, Banda, whoever shouldn't waste his time with any jits that don't play like this.
 
Back
Top