forums

Zero Talent - ZERO

Advertisement
razrcane said:
Not in the regular season like Lane. It was the first time in their history that they won 10 regular season games And Lane lost his OC and DC from last year and 80% of his offensive production and didn’t miss a beat.
Click to expand...

Didn't miss a beat? He's about to be 8-3 and is down by 50 to a team that lost to Liberty two weeks ago.
 
ThomasM said:
It's called coaching. Our COACHES don't put our players in position to make plays. We have a roster full of 3 and 4 star players that most big programs fought over. MTSU has 1 star players, but coaches that could at least get them into position to make plays against Miami. MTSU, by the way, is 5-5. They are NOT a talented team. They just ran into the biggest **** show on turf when they played us. That's coaching. Ours suck.
Click to expand...
They just beat fau by 28 points to
 
UM has had just as bad offensive performances as tonight against teams that are nowhere near as talented or well coached as Clemson. That means that the offense coaching and scheme is a problem we literally beat a team that is significantly worst than Clemson with field goals. Blaming the players is asinine, Gattis’s offense and Mario’s offense philosophy ******* suck and it shows.
 
WanderFranco said:
Didn't miss a beat? He's about to be 8-3 and is down by 50 to a team that lost to Liberty two weeks ago.
Click to expand...
Still going to be top 25 and finish with at least 9 wins which is only 1 less than last year and still top 15 in offense with a completely rebuilt offense.
 
MasterBlaster said:
Biggest problem is Gattis, he is the cancer here. He is D'Onofrio reincarnated on the offensive side of the ball. Steele has shown the ability to coach up the defense.
Click to expand...
If he's retained then I would agree. No D was around for several seasons but golden couldn't grow a sack. Doubt Mario has that problem
 
Advertisement
Gotta think back to his OC hire.. took all winter to get Gattis while Brady was just waiting.. Gattis isn’t a good recruiter and sure is he’ll not a game planner or game day coach. Not sure of “the process”
 
Yoyo82 said:
That's all that needs to be said..any decent coach could and should be able to scheme up 100 yards of offense against ANY team in the country.

Find me more games this year where a team didn't put up 100 yards of offense.

Austin Peay put 200 yards on Bama today. Sanford put up 128 yards on UGA earlier this year.

You're telling me that the disparity between our offense and Clemsons defense is greater than Samford and UGA or Austin Peay and Bama?

Those teams have a HUGE talent disadvantage and they're still finding ways to scheme more yards than we are.
Click to expand...
I’d rather have both Austin Peay and Sanford’s offensive line than ours. It’s that bad.
 
WanderFranco said:
Again, these aren't robots that coaches get to program. Just because your gorilla logic can't comprehend why one team can get a couple more wins than another in one season doesn't make it a bad argument.

You obviously don't get the Brady Hoke reference.
Click to expand...
I actually know why that happens…coaching. It’s your “gorilla logic” that can’t answer that question. If it’s not coaching as you constantly assert, Your only possible argument is that we somehow have worse talent than duke, which is laughable
 
A… It sorta depends how you define talent… speed, strength, dexterity and athleticism, natural instincts and smarts? – Yes

B… Willing to work the extra mile, lead by example, block and get dirty and go all out, get into the best shape and condition mentally and physically? – Yes

If you wanna say coaches need to impact (B) more than (A) I’d say you were right, and these high-priced guys have certainly come up short HERE!

If you wanna say this staff’s expertise to get top results out of (A) isn’t proven and worthy… and deny the immense influence of culture, attitude, desire, N.I.L. and more on (B), (which is awful here and the main cause of our poor results, ) I think you are fooling yourself.
 
Advertisement
Tru C said:
James Williams will start next year
Kam will start next year
Couch will start next year
Avantae will see significant time next year

Frank Ladson will start next year
Young will start next year
Restrepo will start next year
TVD will start next year
Arroyo and Skinner will split time next year


That is just some off of the top of my head minus the dline as you said. I don't expect to see significant differences overall. However, I happen to believe many of these players have more talent than their counterparts in the Coastal Division.
Click to expand...
lol you just names 2 guys on D who’ll probably not be here..
 
jkdood said:
A… It sorta depends how you define talent… speed, strength, dexterity and athleticism, natural instincts and smarts? – Yes

B… Willing to work the extra mile, lead by example, block and get dirty and go all out, get into the best shape and condition mentally and physically? – Yes

If you wanna say coaches need to impact (B) more than (A) I’d say you were right, and these high-priced guys have certainly come up short HERE!

If you wanna say this staff’s expertise to get top results out of (A) isn’t proven and worthy… and deny the immense influence of culture, attitude, desire, N.I.L. and more on (B), (which is awful here and the main cause of our poor results, ) I think you are fooling yourself.
Click to expand...
oh, and when you define Talent as (B), MTSU and Duke are indeed more talented, and it showed...
 
Lol after the season we’ve had I can’t believe there are ppl that are defending the coaching over the talent on the roster.

In one year Mario/Gattis have turned the offense from competent to absolute garbage. Is it too hard to expect that this roster beat the likes of MTSU/Duke? Quite frankly they should have also beat the abomination that Texas A&M has put on the field as well.
 
Back
Top