Key with recruiting big men is finding guys with great frames, plus athleticism for their size, and big motors. The rest a good college OL coach can teach.
I tend to shy away from the big HS slobs with dicey motors who dominate once in awhile on size alone.
THIS. Outside of QB, this is the position that requires the most projection. How many highly ranked OL prospects have we had get in here and bust because they were used to getting by on size?
I look at DTs the same way, which is why I don't get too upset when it looks like we're not recruiting many traditional 300+ pound HS DTs. I'd rather get a big HS DE with a giant motor and good athleticism and let him grow into a DT. Or take an undersized HS DT with great athleticism and grow him into a 290 pounder.
I don't trust fat HS kids. They tend to bust at an alarming rate.
Couldn't agree more. I'd so much rather take Moten, Mcintosh, Jon Ford types. Everyone on here was ****ting on Tyreic Martin last year...from where I'm sitting, that's exactly the type of kid you take and develop into a tackle. All about projecting what they'll be 3 years down the line.
Meanwhile, none of the "can't miss" fat guys from down here has done anything lately. Forston, Valentine, Chief Keef, Khairi Clark, etc.
That was the scariest thing about Golden's defense from Day 1. It required a big 335 pound kid that could get **** done in the middle. How many of them are there in college football in any given year? 2 or 3? How many good nose tackles have EVER come out of South Florida?