I believe if he kept the video he could been charged with voyerism. Has nothing to do with hiding a rape. It's illegal to film her without her consent.
"Anyway it has been proven that she is lying." For anyone to continue to bash on the kid because he attends fsu sho be ashame of themselves. 3 separate legal entities has come to the same conclusion. What else needs to be said? Constant contradictions and witness accounts has proven otherwise.
Voyeurism charge because of the cell phone? How about we consult the Florida statutues again...
810.14 Voyeurism prohibited; penalties.—
(1) A person commits the offense of voyeurism when he or she, with lewd, lascivious, or indecent intent:
(a) Secretly observes another person when the other person is located in a dwelling, structure, or conveyance and such location provides a reasonable expectation of privacy.
(b) Secretly observes another person’s intimate areas in which the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, when the other person is located in a public or private dwelling, structure, or conveyance. As used in this paragraph, the term “intimate area” means any portion of a person’s body or undergarments that is covered by clothing and intended to be protected from public view.
Casher admitted to the police he OBSERVED them having *** prior to the taping, so his statement was enough on its own merits to to have probable cause to charge him with voyeurism, since observing, not video recording is the key element of the offense. TPD didn't charge him (no surprise there) and your argument as to why he destroyed the video is, to put it mildly, in shambles.
"Anyway it has been proven that she is lying."
It has not been "proven" she is lying. SHE WAS NEVER CHARGED WITH AN OFFENSE NUMBNUTS! The only thing indisputable is that the Tallahicky PD is, like F$U PD, is a paid goon force who will not carry out their law enforcement duties if it interferes with their vested (READ:$$$$$) interest.