- Joined
- Nov 2, 2011
- Messages
- 23,512
Many pundits are saying it will be.
I do actually think if we win this it’ll be by 14+Us vs the buck-nuts? Yeah, we are gonna blow them out
I'd be surprised if we won by more than two scores.Many pundits are saying it will be.
Many pundits are saying it will be.
As soon as the line opened it dropped 1-1.5 points almost instantly in favor of Miami which tells me people think this will be a closer game than original prognostications. If I had no affiliation to this game I would look at that initial spread and think that’s way too much, objectively speaking.Miami looked like the best team in the country until Louisville. If that team played OSU we are probably a 3 pt dog on a neutral field, just because they get the benefit of the doubt as the defending champs. So then the question is did Miami get exposed or did we lose due to self-inflicted dumb mistakes? I think it was mostly the latter but I understand thinking otherwise. Looks like we figured it out and are back to being the team we were at the beginning of the season. Pundits are saying it's the former, and we are the team that lost to Louisville and SMU- a big part of the problem was Beck and Dawson. And why did Miami only get 10 pts against TAMU? Beck and Dawson (and the kicker). Weather played a factor but playcalling was not good and Beck wasn't really a factor other than not throwing picks. I thought Dawson was overrated coming into this season and I think he's our biggest weakness in the postseason. A better OC could get a lot more out of Beck and this offense. Hopefully the defense plays like it did against TAMU and 10 pts will be enough.
because they don't know about big game mario vs random mario, and assume our offense sucks because the A&M game despite being repeatedly told the wind was insaneMany pundits are saying it will be.