Some of us just want to see the program get back to relevance instead of a perpetual mid level ACC Coastal team. I view those people as the true Canes fans but you do you.
Everyone wants Miami to get back to relevance; but judging this program week-by-week, or snap-by-snap—without being realistic in regards to how far this thing has fallen and how a new staff needs time to get it right—is just flat-out idiotic.
There is a complete denial and ability to comprehend that what this program current is, versus what they want it to—despite 15 years of irrelevance, five head coaches over a 14-year span, a 1-of-15- run regarding Coastal Division titles (and no ACC crowns) and something like a 99-73 record since Coker's final game in Boise.
All these people keep talking about some "standard" that is LONG GONE as this sport has grown at a rapid rate, regarding finances and overall parity across the board.
Why isn't Miami "back"—because of a lack of continuity; firing coaches every few years (after making the wrong hires) ... it's always one step forward, five steps back.
We have a fan base that was chest-thumping all off-season about "The New Miami"—as if it was some instant-fix, instead of a long-term culture change and what Diaz is building the program towards.
Delusional fans get heightened expectations and then are constantly let down and bitter when they're not met.
There were two types of fans in 2017—those who looked at 10-0 and were screaming "PLAYOFFS!! WE WANT CLEMSON!!! CANES ARE BACK!!!" and then the logical fan who saw glaring weaknesses, sub-par quarterback play and some miracle finishes against FSU, GT, UNC, and Cute and knew this was realistically 7-3 team at that point of the season, instead of one that was riding momentum (all the way through Notre Dame) and was getting all the breaks.
The fact people come on this site and **** and moan every week over every letting thing—yet were the same one screaming "12-0!" to start the season ... that's on them, not the coaches.
Great, everyone WANTS to get back to relevance — but what moves made over the past 15 years have done ANYTHING to put Miami any closer to that goal? A cheap hire in Randy Shannon and a waste of four years? A low-rent hire in Al Golden when no one else wanted the job—and a waste of five years? Nevin Shapiro and an NCAA investigation during that span, a well?
Mark Richt coming in well-intended but learning after three years he wasn't hard-wired to do a young man's job of rebuilding a program from the ground up — which rolled the "wasted years" count to 12 seasons, not counting those 3-4 years Coker cruised on autopilot.
Nobody has been home to run this program for a decade-and-a-half—yet people are confused as to why the culture is broken and Miami can't take the necessary steps to get back to relevancy?
What was Einstein's definition of insanity—doing the same thing over and over, but expecting different results?
At some point people need to process things like adults and look at this program as a whole—especially the decisions made over the past 15 seasons—instead of spouting off tired nonsense about the way things used to be, what the standard use to be, how it used to be "national championship, or bust" and blah, blah, blah.
News flash; Notre Dame was a force in the leather helmet era and outside of that 1988 stolen title, has been irrelevant for about half a century.
Pitt was a force with Tony Dorsett in the 1970s, too. What happened to that era? Long gone.
Nebraska was a force under Tom Osborne, but everything soon changed and they're irrelevant as ****.
For some reason a part of this fan base wants to believe this program is somehow above 15 years worth of bad decisions, as well as a big money sport growing at a rapid pace in which Miami is now struggling to keep up.