why do people still think golden can be a good HC?

Three types of people still support Golden:

1. Uneducated idiots - probably work at a mall kiosk. Dropped out of 10th grade. Lack critical thinking skills and are unable to see the big picture. Lap up any garbage Golden throws at them because they are too stupid to think for themselves or actually look at on-field performance.

2. Football chicks - football chicks are casual male fans that do not understand the game. They think blind optimism makes them a fan. They buy a shirt at Wal-Mart, and try to start the "DE-FENSE" chant when Miami is on offense. They hear Golden say things like "cloud" and "process" and they suck that shlt up like a wine spritzer at brunch. They'll fire excuses at you like a machine gun, and they think Stanley Shakespeare was William's brother.

3. Racists - the same group that was calling for Randy's head halfway through his third season, are now lobbying to give their great white savoir 20 seasons to prove himself. They have every excuse in the book ready to go. They cannot believe that their well-spoken white leader would stand up in a nice tie with a quality haircut and lie to him. They are racist bigots with a hateful agenda.


Or, to make it simpler, faqqots. Faqqost are the kind of people that still think Golden can be a good head coach.
 
Advertisement
With the talent we have in our back yard, a ******* blind monkey could be a successful HC here with the right coordinators IMO. With that being said you can put me in the category that believes with a good DC with a different style, Golden could be successful here.
 
With the talent we have in our back yard, a ******* blind monkey could be a successful HC here with the right coordinators IMO. With that being said you can put me in the category that believes with a good DC with a different style, Golden could be successful here.
I cannot comprehend how people think this. Why do you think Golden could be successful here? What evidence do you base that off of? Why don't you articulate a reason that has to do with football or running a team?

What kind of mental gymnastics do you want to participate in to explain away the fact that this defense is Golden's? Are you slow or just that naive to think that someone is going to change the way THEY have coached defense for decades?
 
With the talent we have in our back yard, a ****ing blind monkey could be a successful HC here with the right coordinators IMO. With that being said you can put me in the category that believes with a good DC with a different style, Golden could be successful here.

Based on what? What has Golden shown that leads you to believe this?
 
...but many on here believe we are simply a DC away from being a top 15 even top 10 team.....

No one here thinks that. They all have to go.

ferman and his loyal constituent seem to think that. his article the other day saying golden needs more time was preposterous. arguing that we should give golden more time because we didnt give coker or shannon enough time and we all saw how that turned out, and basically saying we have the best offense in the country and golden deserves credit for that. what a joke

That's not "on here".

:ibis-roflmao-sm3: @ two people in this very thread saying they think Golden would be successful here with better coordinators.
 
My point was any half competent coach should be able to be successful here. There's too much local talent. IMO, Golden is half competent-ish..... He needs to do a better job hiring/firing assistants and he would look better as a coach.
 
My point was any half competent coach should be able to be successful here. There's too much local talent. IMO, Golden is half competent-ish..... He needs to do a better job hiring/firing assistants and he would look better as a coach.

Based on what?
 
Advertisement
My point was any half competent coach should be able to be successful here. There's too much local talent. IMO, Golden is half competent-ish..... He needs to do a better job hiring/firing assistants and he would look better as a coach.

Based on what?

IDK man... I just want to win and I guess my orange and green glasses have me hoping. He does have some good qualities. Just none of them relate to coaching on the field. lol
 
My point was any half competent coach should be able to be successful here. There's too much local talent. IMO, Golden is half competent-ish..... He needs to do a better job hiring/firing assistants and he would look better as a coach.

Based on what?

IDK man... I just want to win and I guess my orange and green glasses have me hoping. He does have some good qualities. Just none of them relate to coaching on the field. lol
What good qualities would those be? And if none of them relate to the field, why are said qualities relevant?
 
Three types of people still support Golden:

1. Uneducated idiots - probably work at a mall kiosk. Dropped out of 10th grade. Lack critical thinking skills and are unable to see the big picture. Lap up any garbage Golden throws at them because they are too stupid to think for themselves or actually look at on-field performance.

2. Football chicks - football chicks are casual male fans that do not understand the game. They think blind optimism makes them a fan. They buy a shirt at Wal-Mart, and try to start the "DE-FENSE" chant when Miami is on offense. They hear Golden say things like "cloud" and "process" and they suck that shlt up like a wine spritzer at brunch. They'll fire excuses at you like a machine gun, and they think Stanley Shakespeare was William's brother.

3. Racists - the same group that was calling for Randy's head halfway through his third season, are now lobbying to give their great white savoir 20 seasons to prove himself. They have every excuse in the book ready to go. They cannot believe that their well-spoken white leader would stand up in a nice tie with a quality haircut and lie to him. They are racist bigots with a hateful agenda.


Or, to make it simpler, faqqots. Faqqost are the kind of people that still think Golden can be a good head coach.

Number two is running amuck on dis bytch
 
With the talent we have in our back yard, a ****ing blind monkey could be a successful HC here with the right coordinators IMO. With that being said you can put me in the category that believes with a good DC with a different style, Golden could be successful here.
I cannot comprehend how people think this. Why do you think Golden could be successful here? What evidence do you base that off of? Why don't you articulate a reason that has to do with football or running a team?

What kind of mental gymnastics do you want to participate in to explain away the fact that this defense is Golden's? Are you slow or just that naive to think that someone is going to change the way THEY have coached defense for decades?

Yup this

This ***** ain't ripping a page out his binder dat says 3-4 special for 4-3 aggressiveness.
 
Advertisement
Here's the real shame about some of you selfish pricks.

You want a change? Fine. At this point, barring something miraculous, I believe we need a change as well.

Banners? Whatever. Ain't my cup of tea, but it's a free country.

But to root against your football team is pure sacrilege for this reason. Hoping that the team loses is an "F you" to the players on the team.

"But it's for the long term good of the program." And what program is there without THE PLAYERS????

The Head Coach is an administrative issue. It's not an issue that the players should have to suffer from. There's guys out there playing for their careers and for the love of their university and team, yet you root for them to lose? You think it's fine with Duke Johnson that we just go to Blacksburg and get stomped out tonight? **** naw. Those dudes practice and lift weights to go compete while most of you couch whores watch games from your homes in the comfortable AC and sip mixed drinks. Rooting for the team to lose is to root against the players and if I was Jamal Carter or Clive or Flowers, I'd run straight in somebodies mouth if they told me they were a Canes fan and they were rooting for us to lose.
 
Golden is a good coach.

Question is can he become a great coach?
I just don't understand how people actually say and believe this. Do they actually know anything at all about football all and what we've done and showed on the field the past 4 years? I just don't get it.
 
1 healthy scoop of Normalcy Bias gently folded into a bowl full of Dunning Kruger makes Al Gorlden a fantastic coach!
 
Here's the real shame about some of you selfish pricks.

You want a change? Fine. At this point, barring something miraculous, I believe we need a change as well.

Banners? Whatever. Ain't my cup of tea, but it's a free country.

But to root against your football team is pure sacrilege for this reason. Hoping that the team loses is an "F you" to the players on the team.

"But it's for the long term good of the program." And what program is there without THE PLAYERS????

The Head Coach is an administrative issue. It's not an issue that the players should have to suffer from. There's guys out there playing for their careers and for the love of their university and team, yet you root for them to lose? You think it's fine with Duke Johnson that we just go to Blacksburg and get stomped out tonight? **** naw. Those dudes practice and lift weights to go compete while most of you couch whores watch games from your homes in the comfortable AC and sip mixed drinks. Rooting for the team to lose is to root against the players and if I was Jamal Carter or Clive or Flowers, I'd run straight in somebodies mouth if they told me they were a Canes fan and they were rooting for us to lose.

Stfu you moron. Youre a ******* football chick, saying you like goldens friendship with dorito over UM being good.
 
Back
Top