canesproponent
Sophomore
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2012
- Messages
- 1,401
That is faulty logic. Your argument is predicated on the notion that a university makes most of its revenue on football. That is a preposterous take. People go to Alabama bc they are from Alabama, or a neighboring state, and they were able to get into Bama academically, and not Duke or Harvard for example. Not talking football players here, just talking students. While Bama for example does really well in football revenue, the university will always make so much more money in the sum of all their other revenue streams, led by grants and tuition.
Let me elucidate. People go to these schools because they HAVE to. Excluding Vanderbilt, not a single person on the planet would choose the SEC over a Duke or Virginia.
The degrees these students earn from the SEC schools are worthless, so the schools need to engender loyalty for future donations. They need something to tie these students to the school and that bond is football.
Tuition to these schools is a finite revenue stream that does not equal what these schools derive in donations and tuition in most schools is subsidized. If these schools had poor football programs, it would decimate donations. That was my point.
I have worked at 8 elite institutions and we only considered Vanderbilt students (from the SEC schools). If you had degrees from Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi and/or LSU, your resume went immediately into the trash.