swampcougar1
sophomore
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Messages
- 4,992
To me this is like being between a rock and a hard place. Feagles more capable of kicking a high non returnable punt but more likely to shank one.
It's a tough question, because if Spicer puts no hangtime in his punt and allows for an easy return like he did against UNC, with how bad our coverage is with everything in ST, it could be worse.
What good is 40 yards/punt if you allow over 15 yards/return and the possibility of a touchdown?
THISWe will not need to punt tomorrow!
The blocking as been crap all year on punts and fgsWe better tighten our protection the **** up and stop playing around and get something blocked. That's how a **** bird team like FSU hangs around; blocking kicks and starting at their 45
Was told by a source that Feags will be back at P1, not joking btw
Spicer. I'll take consistency all day every day.
We have the better team, so as long as the punter doesn't LOSE us the game, I think we're good.
Ask yourself this - which punter, Feagles or Spicer, is more likely to ***** up and lose us the game?
But ESPN told us we can't boo our punter.This is probably an underrated topic. We lost the LSU game because LSU was basically playing arena football against us. They only needed like 25 yards to get points be it a TD or FG. If FSU is constantly starting drives at their 45 or better that will definitely keep the game close just ask Pitt last year.
If Feagles on that same BS he is going to get boo'd to oblivion.