Who do we want to lose this weekend?

How does bama winning help Miami? If bama losses and has 3 losses albeit one in a corner championship the committee really is going to act Ike the game doesn’t count at all? It’s a free loss? It’s time to end contented championships which is wild to think. This sport is basically amateur nfl and has lost everything about itself

I’m getting really tired of watching the NCAA stumble through its so-called “playoff selection process” while pretending it’s anything other than a thinly veiled professional league. The NCAA wants every benefit of a pro sports model without accepting any of the responsibility or structure that comes with it.

Here’s the core difference that exposes the whole charade:
The NFL (and the NBA) don’t beg fans to donate to pay their players. Player compensation is baked directly into the cost of doing business—tickets, parking, concessions, merchandise, broadcast deals. It’s transparent and professional. Meanwhile, the NCAA leans on its fanbases with the guilt-trip pitch for NIL funds like they’re passing around a church collection plate to subsidize their own multi-billion-dollar industry. They want market-value production from athletes but still market those athletes as “students first.” It’s a fake pro model wrapped in tired myths.

And the playoff selection process exposes this even more. The NCAA still relies on subjective narratives crafted decades ago—“gritty underdogs,” “tradition,” “feel-good stories,” the old Touchdown Johnny vibes—as if the sport hasn’t completely transformed. Those sentimental angles used to work, back when people bought into the illusion of amateurism. But that era is over. The money’s too big, the stakes are too high, and the athletes are far too valuable for the selection process to be based on vibes and résumé-storytelling from a committee in a conference room.

If the NCAA wants to operate like a professional league—and it already does in everything but name—then it’s time to objectify the system. Clear criteria. Transparent metrics. No more political favoritism. No more “eye test.” No more narrative snow-globe nonsense where teams are elevated because it makes a good segment on TV.

Either lean into being a professional enterprise or stop monetizing like one. But the middle-ground act is exhausted, exposed, and embarrassing. If the NCAA really wants legitimacy, it’s past time to stop pretending and start treating playoff selection like the business it actually is.
 
Advertisement
I’m sure it’s buried in a thread somewhere but I haven’t dug deep enough to find it, so I ask who do we want to lose (or win same question) for us to get in?

I’ll hang up and listen


BYU and Alabama.

The answer is only, and has only been, BYU and Alabama.

They must both lose. Painfully, if possible.
 
If you are a miami fan, you want alabama to lose by three touchdowns
Nooooooooooooo. We do not. Why do people keep saying this. Alabama could lose by 60 and they will still be in the playoffs. It’s rigged in their favor. Our only path in is a BYU loss and a Bama win. This ensures we are right next to ND, allowing for the direct head to head comparison.
 
Why does Alabama need to win?

You guys think a 3-loss SEC team would make it in?


Because certain posters are delusional and refuse to acknowledge that the CFPC will ALWAYS penalize the losers of championship games.

Historically. The proof is out there, if certain posters wouldn't FORGET what happened to Georgia in 2023.

Look it up. I dare you.
 
Nooooooooooooo. We do not. Why do people keep saying this. Alabama could lose by 60 and they will still be in the playoffs. It’s rigged in their favor. Our only path in is a BYU loss and a Bama win. This ensures we are right next to ND, allowing for the direct head to head comparison.

Yup. Only way. We want Bama to win, or lose by 40. Which do you think is likelier?

A close loss to UGA, those boys will skate right into the playoff, likely dropping to #10. Nice buffer again between us and ND. Miami goes home.

Go Bama. Roll **** Tide.
 
Nooooooooooooo. We do not. Why do people keep saying this. Alabama could lose by 60 and they will still be in the playoffs. It’s rigged in their favor. Our only path in is a BYU loss and a Bama win. This ensures we are right next to ND, allowing for the direct head to head comparison.


Your entire post is a false, and certainly stands in STARK contrast to what happened to Georgia in 2023 (and other SEC teams in other years).

This bull**** about "Alabama could lose by 60 and still be in the playoffs" is not true.

Yes, the CFPC has been sucking Sankey's taint for weeks. But even Sankey couldn't win an argument about why a 10-3 team that just lost by 60 didn't drop by more than 1 spot in the rankings.

Stop this bull****.

Georgia was dropped from #1 to #6 in 2023 off of a THREE-POINT LOSS. A (formerly) undefeated team missed the playoffs due to a 3-point loss in a conference championship game. Fortunately, they took out their pain and anger on a (formerly) undefeated F$U team in a bowl game.
 
BYU and Alabama.

The answer is only, and has only been, BYU and Alabama.

They must both lose. Painfully, if possible.
Bama has to win, @TheOriginalCane. The reason why? The whole thing is rigged. We have to put ourselves in the mind of the committee.

1) Bama moved in front of ND to prevent them from falling out of the top 10, even with a loss in the SEC championship game. The #1 seed in the SEC is not missing out on the playoff because they lose a conference championship game that they earned the right to be in. It’s not going to happen.

2) If Bama wins, they move up. UGA moves down but not enough to drop behind ND, as they will only drop a few spots at most. ND can’t jump anyone and remains at #10. If Bama loses, the committee will put them at #10 and move ND back to #9. The one-team buffer would remain and we would be screwed.

3) BYU loses. We jump them. As long as ND remains at 10, which will happen with a Bama win, we are right behind them. At that point, with zero buffer and zero excuses to not do the right thing, the committee will honor head to head. I know it.
 
Your entire post is a false, and certainly stands in STARK contrast to what happened to Georgia in 2023 (and other SEC teams in other years).

This bull**** about "Alabama could lose by 60 and still be in the playoffs" is not true.

Yes, the CFPC has been sucking Sankey's taint for weeks. But even Sankey couldn't win an argument about why a 10-3 team that just lost by 60 didn't drop by more than 1 spot in the rankings.

Stop this bull****.

Georgia was dropped from #1 to #6 in 2023 off of a THREE-POINT LOSS. A (formerly) undefeated team missed the playoffs due to a 3-point loss in a conference championship game. Fortunately, they took out their pain and anger on a (formerly) undefeated F$U team in a bowl game.
That was a different playoff. Not the 12 team format. Apples to oranges.
 
Advertisement
Yup. Only way. We want Bama to win, or lose by 40. Which do you think is likelier?

A close loss to UGA, those boys will skate right into the playoff, likely dropping to #10. Nice buffer again between us and ND. Miami goes home.

Go Bama. Roll **** Tide.
This isn’t hard to understand. Sankey would burn the playoff to the ground if the #1 seed in the SEC was pushed out because they were good enough to play an extra game. The committee is stacked with a bunch of SEC **** suckers. They are not going to punish Bama. This isn’t the 4-team era anymore. Times have changed.
 
Lmao, if Bama loses a close one (let’s say 27-24 type of game) they’re definitely not out. They’ll go back to #10 and ND to #9. They need to win…or lose by 4 TDs (which is not happening). Even a 7-10 point loss won’t drop them past #10.

You guys are delusional.
 
Because certain posters are delusional and refuse to acknowledge that the CFPC will ALWAYS penalize the losers of championship games.

Historically. The proof is out there, if certain posters wouldn't FORGET what happened to Georgia in 2023.

Look it up. I dare you.
I hear your frustration. Your reasoning is logical, but you are dealing with an irrational committee that is rigging the process right before our eyes to cater to the SEC. That was next to impossible when the playoff was only 4 teams. Now, at 12, you can’t punish teams who would already be in the playoff if the season ended today, just because they lost an extra game.
 
Lmao, if Bama loses a close one (let’s say 27-24 type of game) they’re definitely not out. They’ll go back to #10 and ND to #9. They need to win…or lose by 4 TDs (which is not happening). Even a 7-10 point loss won’t drop them past #10.

You guys are delusional.
Yes, they aren’t getting blown out. Georgia isn’t good enough to do that.

Instead, our only path is a Bama win.
 
So, BYU definitely needs to lose by wide margin

Now, what about Bama

IMG_4522.jpeg
 
The best argument for the Bama **** is what will maybe happen vs. what will definitely happen.

If Bama loses, MAYBE they drop entirely out. We don't know that they will. I think you're crazy if you believe they will, but I'll humor anyone that thinks they will. I'll give it a hard MAYBE. It's absolutely NOT 100% that they drop out with a loss. So, there is a chance they only go to 10, and ND moves above them again. A chance. There's a chance they drop out entirely and Miami/ND both move in. Again. A chance.

If Bama wins, they DEFINITELY stay above ND. 100.0%. ND WILL NOT move up from #10. The whole point here is to get Miami and ND directly next to each other so the committee has no choice but to move Miami ahead due to the H2H aspect. In this iteration of the CFP committee, there are now 14 examples of teams who played one another being directly next to each other in the rankings. In ALL 14 examples, the team who won the H2H match-up have been ranked ahead. That's 14 times just this year, and H2H put the winning team ahead in all 14 instances. This is what we want.

BYU losing is the non-negotiable. We must have that happen.

Beyond that, assess percentages. If Bama wins, we WILL be directly compared with ND.
If Bama loses, we MIGHT have them drop below us.

I know I'm weird, but in my world, a WILL outweighs a MIGHT.

Roll **** Tide baybay!!
 
Advertisement
The best argument for the Bama **** is what will likely happen vs. what will definitely happen.

If Bama loses, MAYBE they drop entirely out. We don't know that they will. I think you're crazy if you believe they will, but I'll humor anyone that thinks they will. I'll give it a hard MAYBE. It's absolutely NOT 100% that they drop out with a loss. So, there is a chance they only go to 10, and ND moves above them again. A chance. There's a chance they drop out entirely and Miami/ND both move in. Again. A chance.

If Bama wins, they DEFINITELY stay above ND. 100.0%. ND WILL NOT move up from #10. The whole point here is to get Miami and ND directly next to each other so the committee has no choice but to move Miami ahead due to the H2H aspect. In this iteration of the CFP committee, there are now 14 examples of teams who played one another being directly next to each other in the rankings. In ALL 14 examples, the team who won the H2H match-up have been ranked ahead. That's 14 times just this year, and H2H put the winning team ahead in all 14 instances. This is what we want.

BYU losing is the non-negotiable. We must have that happen.

Beyond that, assess percentages. If Bama wins, we WILL be directly compared with ND.
If Bama loses, we MIGHT have them drop below us.

I know I'm weird, but in my world, a WILL outweighs a MIGHT.

Roll **** Tide baybay!!
I still think we gotta get to 10 in whatever combination of wins/losses it takes. At 10 we’re in. I just don’t trust the CFBC to make an objective decision between us and ND if they are 10 and we are 11.
 
honestly, idc anymore. if we were getting in, they would have put us in already and we should have been in OVER OU, ND (h2h), and Bama (common opponent).
 
I still think we gotta get to 10 in whatever combination of wins/losses it takes. At 10 we’re in. I just don’t trust the CFBC to make an objective decision between us and ND if they are 10 and we are 11.
i honestly think we gotta get to 9 somehow. theyll just replace us with an 11-2 UVA and say theyre the highest ranked team from the ACC. 9 ensures were an at large
 
Back
Top