Empirical Cane
We are what we repeatedly do.
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2018
- Messages
- 33,570
You bring up a good point." And, more importantly, at no point was hiring the overall best coach for the job the primary concern ( EMPHASIS ADDED!!!! ). It was always finding the guy they wanted to hire for political, financial, or stability reasons, and then reverse engineering the logic from there, hoping the football would work out. " fivereasonssports.com
And that Cane dudes is the rub. huh?
Nevertheless, all of these HC's since Mr. Onion Head's tenure were good enough for a NINE win regular season. But crapped out in bowl games. Ouch. And as the vast majority of Cane dudes know. The proverbial nefarious powerw that be are " satisfied"- EMPHASIS ADDED- with eight or nine regular season wins. And said university power brokers DON'T GIVE an F' if the Canes lose a particular bowl game. huh? Because they know the football program is still going to receive their pot of the bowl game payout.
What is the definition of a "good" HC for University of Coral Gables from BoT perspective (hint: theirs' is all that matters)?
5-8 W/season paying staff Top 30ish salaries?
Massive repeated success.
Championships (regardless of staff pay)?
Massive repeated failure.
What does THIS BoT want? We have at least some indication via "E before W" Lemonis.....