They were thrown off the team because they made an admission of guilt.
So now they're not guilty because of some unsourced sound bite that's impossible to verify?
Sounds legit.
Do you know exactly what they admitted to whom and under what circumstances? Consider this a rhetorical question because we both know that you know nothing.
Here's what I know. That's years in the past. Here's what else I know: they were kicked off the team and expelled from the school. Here's what else I know: they accepted the deal for first time offenders. They could have easily not accepted the deal and declared their innocence. But they had already admitted, it's in the public record, of drugging and raping her.
One other thing I know: you're a ******* cūnt trying to make the school look bad because they did the right thing in getting rid of them. You started this whole thread knowingly, to stir this shīt up.
It's over. They're guilty, they admitted it, and they took the deal. CASE CLOSED, CASE OVER.