- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Messages
- 7,597
Jesus did not know that. We have been really stupid then.We have had YEARS to suggest/make-a-motion/force-a-vote on a "Top 25 ranking" limiter language in the tiebreakers.
We should have done this when the CFP expanded to 12 teams. Anyone incapable of realizing that this day COULD HAPPEN is just not paying enough attention.
I have been warning that "overly large conferences" have advantages and disadvantages. The biggest disadvantage is that two teams may end up playing very DISSIMILAR conference schedules, with very few "common opponents" and a wide disparity on strength of (conference) schedule.
That is where we are today.
A Duke team incapable of beating Illinois, Tulane, and UCONN is now our second-best conference team (per the tiebreakers).
This is such a massive hose job, so much worse than '00. at least that year there were only 2 bids, this time it's 7 at large and the ACC-CG nonsense. We are clearly one of the top 7 at large teams. Thanks for the info and sorry for the rant but this result is freaking ridiculous