What kind of Offense did we run under Richt?

ScorpioCane

Caniac
Premium
Joined
Jan 30, 2012
Messages
477
I'm curious what most would call the style of offense that Mark Richt ran here?

Richt's offense sure looked like a RPO based pro spread offense to me.

What makes Alabama or Clemson's offense a spread and not UGA? They all line up in shotgun or pistol majority of the time in similar formations, so are they really that different? From an alignment standpoint our offense sure looked similar to these under Richt (and I do mean alignment only, we know the stats).


Bottom line the person calling the plays matter first and foremost regardless of what we choose to call an offense. The word "Spread" does not equal Top 20 offense the OC behind calling said Spread or said offense does.

Calling an offense Spread, Multiple, or Pro is just semantics for the most part as most of the time they all run similar things over half of the time. Obviously all teams may not line up in the I-formation, but even Ohio State has line up with Fields under center several times this year to run a play in a none short yardage situation and everyone will say they run spread.

We can all agree that Enos is not the answer for OC, but he actually may have a point regarding what makes an offense a Spread Offense. Most people don't have a clue and just name what ever team is winning and line up in the Shotgun/Pistol most of the time a spread offense to fit the narrative. People are just out here saying "Spread" like it's the new Fad term and the answer to every question.

Do I think Enos is running a spread offense? No, does he use some spread elements and concepts in his offense sometimes? Yes


If most are not being short sighted Enos biggest problems are his feel or rhythm with play calling (which he has none), knowing how to use tempo (which he can't even when we need to run a 2 minute offense) and not calling specific plays to get playmakers touches (He obviously did not learn the touch counter that Mike Locksley was using at Bama for his play makers).
 
Advertisement
everyone is focused on spread, the one thing noone has run at Miami is tempo, and also using the QB as a run threat
 
Trick question we haven't had an offense since...(jesus) Al Folden. And even he had some terrible OC's.
 
Advertisement

Here’s a good primer on spread offenses. Maybe someone can forward this to Enos as well.

Unless it’s missing an “Enos spread” offense that we’re not aware of, which incorporates slow developing routes, having the QB sit in the pocket for 7 seconds at a time and never be a threat to run, plenty of routes right into the middle of the defense, never taking a deep shot, and dipping your play sheet into a bucket of water before each game.
 
We ran a simple spread

You one of the few that will acknowledge that we ran a Spread, albeit it a simple one and it failed. That does not mean we shouldn't try again. We definitely should, but it shows nothing is fail proof. The focus should be on the guy not the system.
 
Image result for Tecmo bowl plays
 
Advertisement
I'm curious what most would call the style of offense that Mark Richt ran here?

Richt's offense sure looked like a RPO based pro spread offense to me.

What makes Alabama or Clemson's offense a spread and not UGA? They all line up in shotgun or pistol majority of the time in similar formations, so are they really that different? From an alignment standpoint our offense sure looked similar to these under Richt (and I do mean alignment only, we know the stats).


Bottom line the person calling the plays matter first and foremost regardless of what we choose to call an offense. The word "Spread" does not equal Top 20 offense the OC behind calling said Spread or said offense does.

Calling an offense Spread, Multiple, or Pro is just semantics for the most part as most of the time they all run similar things over half of the time. Obviously all teams may not line up in the I-formation, but even Ohio State has line up with Fields under center several times this year to run a play in a none short yardage situation and everyone will say they run spread.

We can all agree that Enos is not the answer for OC, but he actually may have a point regarding what makes an offense a Spread Offense. Most people don't have a clue and just name what ever team is winning and line up in the Shotgun/Pistol most of the time a spread offense to fit the narrative. People are just out here saying "Spread" like it's the new Fad term and the answer to every question.

Do I think Enos is running a spread offense? No, does he use some spread elements and concepts in his offense sometimes? Yes


If most are not being short sighted Enos biggest problems are his feel or rhythm with play calling (which he has none), knowing how to use tempo (which he can't even when we need to run a 2 minute offense) and not calling specific plays to get playmakers touches (He obviously did not learn the touch counter that Mike Locksley was using at Bama for his play makers).

Wasn't even an offense. It was just offensive. smh
 
I'm curious what most would call the style of offense that Mark Richt ran here?

Richt's offense sure looked like a RPO based pro spread offense to me.

What makes Alabama or Clemson's offense a spread and not UGA? They all line up in shotgun or pistol majority of the time in similar formations, so are they really that different? From an alignment standpoint our offense sure looked similar to these under Richt (and I do mean alignment only, we know the stats).


Bottom line the person calling the plays matter first and foremost regardless of what we choose to call an offense. The word "Spread" does not equal Top 20 offense the OC behind calling said Spread or said offense does.

Calling an offense Spread, Multiple, or Pro is just semantics for the most part as most of the time they all run similar things over half of the time. Obviously all teams may not line up in the I-formation, but even Ohio State has line up with Fields under center several times this year to run a play in a none short yardage situation and everyone will say they run spread.

We can all agree that Enos is not the answer for OC, but he actually may have a point regarding what makes an offense a Spread Offense. Most people don't have a clue and just name what ever team is winning and line up in the Shotgun/Pistol most of the time a spread offense to fit the narrative. People are just out here saying "Spread" like it's the new Fad term and the answer to every question.

Do I think Enos is running a spread offense? No, does he use some spread elements and concepts in his offense sometimes? Yes


If most are not being short sighted Enos biggest problems are his feel or rhythm with play calling (which he has none), knowing how to use tempo (which he can't even when we need to run a 2 minute offense) and not calling specific plays to get playmakers touches (He obviously did not learn the touch counter that Mike Locksley was using at Bama for his play makers).
There were the same 3 plays and then a punt.
 
You one of the few that will acknowledge that we ran a Spread, albeit it a simple one and it failed. That does not mean we shouldn't try again. We definitely should, but it shows nothing is fail proof. The focus should be on the guy not the system.
I’m not saying we should not have spread concepts. We do right now. My overall point of contention is fans here who think implementing a FULL SPREAD will solve the issues that plague this offense..it won’t. we play just as poor when we spread it out as we do under center.

You can’t be as poor as we have up front and expect a spread offense to be implemented and make you score 30-35 points with out play upfront. We need to change the way we evaluate up front and develop. There should be no way scaife, Zion and Clark can step on your campus and be a better option among your oline as true freshman.No way. **** even Donaldson was pretty much given a spot. But ppl here gloss over that. That issue started under golden with so many miss evals that didn’t develop within the program. Then we’ve missed with MRs guys.
 
Back
Top