Rellyrell
Rellywood of mWo
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2013
- Messages
- 34,614
When you have budgets in the HUNDREDS of millions of dollars, of course you are going to have a lot more to work with. That said, past a certain point, it’s waste. Miami would like to have a larger nutrition staff, but if there are other more pressing, immediate needs then those will be attacked first. Honestly, it’s amazing that colleges have so many make work jobs in their athletic departments(Pro franchises don’t have huge teams of nutritionists on staff), but they have to burn through the money somehow as nonprofits.
I’ve always believed that if these schools had to pay the athletes a market based salary, these extravagant facilities and staffs would be significantly reduced. Amazing what you can build when you don’t have to pay the talent.
You can’t compare professional teams w/ Universities.
1. Professional teams don’t nearly have the same amount of athletes to care for. U’re talking about a NBA team w/ a maximum of 15 players, NFL teams w/ an active 53 man roster, MLB of 26 players, NHL of 23 players. The University is responsible for 100’s of student athletes, all w/ different nutritional requirements.
2. Professional players are making millions! They often have their own personal trainers, nutritionist, chefs who are specializing & focusing on the athlete that’s paying them directly.
3. Lol; do u really think schools are just spending “hundred’s” of millions on nutrition? Nebraska is on the higher side of spending $3.3m/yr in nutrition, but they also have more student athletes than we do. The avg. is roughly around $1.5m at the P5 level. We’re not Akron, FIU, or The Citadel holmes…we might not have Texas money, but there’s this back & forth narrative that has to stop to justify certain things.
One minute we can’t afford what UGA, Bama, Clemson etc are doing, & then the next, we got big bank $$. Choose one & stick to that.