forums

Official Weekly Polls and Rankings Thread

3rd-43 said:
Mentioned it Sunday, miss state jumps ELEVEN spots for beating Missouri at home by 7… just so it gives Alabama another “impressive” ranked win. WF would smoke Miss state and already did, 8 months ago.
Click to expand...
Josh Pate said he’d put Miss State Top 5, or at least Top 10. 🙄
 
My conspiracy theory is they are making these polls more biased then ever before to help push for the 24 team playoff. Make the other conferences beg for an extra spot or 2 while the sec gets 9-10 teams in.
 
3rd-43 said:
For what????!!?
Click to expand...
He didn’t go into specifics, basically said people just think they are a good QB and that’s it, but people need to watch them because it’s not true.

I haven’t watched them so I can’t say if he’s being an SEC shill or not. He also ranted about Duke, Wake, VT, Pitt not getting love and they’re doing their show from the Pitt/VT game this week.
 
Canes Legacy said:
My conspiracy theory is they are making these polls more biased then ever before to help push for the 24 team playoff. Make the other conferences beg for an extra spot or 2 while the sec gets 9-10 teams in.
Click to expand...
Kombucha Funny Meme GIF
 
3rd-43 said:
For what????!!?
Click to expand...

He basically tried to approach it as if you had your memory wiped from all past success or failure and just simply voted based on what you've seen this year.

The problem with any weekly poll is no matter how you do it you get poll inertia. The only correct way to do this would be to ignore any past success/failure and create one poll at the very end of the season...or, you know, just have a playoff format and seeding that is set by rules and not subjective, corrupt bulls***.
 
hurricaneman said:
He basically tried to approach it as if you had your memory wiped from all past success or failure and just simply voted based on what you've seen this year.

The problem with any weekly poll is no matter how you do it you get poll inertia. The only correct way to do this would be to ignore any past success/failure and create one poll at the very end of the season...or, you know, just have a playoff format and seeding that is set by rules and not subjective, corrupt bulls***.
Click to expand...
AmenCanes said:
If yall would listen to his logic and his own criteria, it makes sense.
Click to expand...
And I agree with this. I have argued for years about anchoring bias. Now people are calling it poll inertia. It's the same thing.

But when someone has a long record of being an SEC homer, I need a little more than "trust me bro" to put Mississippi State in Top 5. He didn't give any reasoning whatsoever. And unlike most of his shows, he didn't give his actual final Top 25 list, so he kind of skirted around the answer of who he would replace, even though he said he was answering it in the show.

Stuff like this is why I will always be cautious about Josh, and why I can't entirely get on board with him.
 
caneingville said:
And I agree with this. I have argued for years about anchoring bias. Now people are calling it poll inertia. It's the same thing.

But when someone has a long record of being an SEC homer, I need a little more than "trust me bro" to put Mississippi State in Top 5. He didn't give any reasoning whatsoever. And unlike most of his shows, he didn't give his actual final Top 25 list, so he kind of skirted around the answer of who he would replace, even though he said he was answering it in the show.

Stuff like this is why I will always be cautious about Josh, and why I can't entirely get on board with him.
Click to expand...

He provides his “rankings” in the Thursday show.

Y’all need to stop speaking with such certainty if you don’t understand his show.
 
AmenCanes said:
He provides his “rankings” in the Thursday show.

Y’all need to stop speaking with such certainty if you don’t understand his show.
Click to expand...
There's a huge difference between not understanding his show and not being part of the bro culture that buys into his bull****.

I'm the latter, not the former.

I'm also not being strung along for multiple days by a content creator, waiting with bated breath until Thursday just to see what his actual "rankings" are.

Hey, don't forget to hit that LIKE BUTTON! Keeps the show free!@!!

But I guess I must just not UNDERSTAND.
 
caneingville said:
There's a huge difference between not understanding his show and not being part of the bro culture that buys into his bull****.

I'm the latter, not the former.

I'm also not being strung along for multiple days by a content creator, waiting with bated breath until Thursday just to see what his actual "rankings" are.

Hey, don't forget to hit that LIKE BUTTON! Keeps the show free!@!!

But I guess I must just not UNDERSTAND.
Click to expand...

This conversation isn’t very productive. That isn’t Pate, or his show, at all.

I do hate that he’s associated himself with the Bussin guys. They are awful.

Pate very clearly articulates his reasoning for everything. He does a Power “rating” every Tuesday that people still don’t understand.

He does his personal “rankings” once per week on Thursdays.

Not agreeing with him is one thing, but please stop speaking in absolutes when it’s clear you don’t follow the show. It comes across as incredibly ignorant, and I think you’re better than that.
 
Back
Top